That amount of truth could not be contained in a single post.Da Stars. wrote:Double post on this. Wow pal.vcsgrizzfan wrote:GSW had an historically great season on many levels.
Chuck should just stfu on this.
Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Honestly, I think a lot of it is just schtick.Madnessssss wrote:barkley is a ringless chump. MJ's Bulls didnt have a dominant big. Still owned Barkley in the finals.
Barkley is always putting Lebron on a similar pedestal as MJ. After defeating Anthony Davis, Dwight Howard, Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph in the playoffs, they beat lebron in the finals. And Green, who Barkley has bashed, put up a triple double in the championship close out game on lebrons home court and won. More impressive than anything Barkley ever accomplished. Not saying Green is better than Barkley, but thats a greater accomplishment than anything Barkley ever did.
Barkely is great at getting a rise out of people, and that's why he's on TV. He's certainly not there for his expert, in-depth analysis.
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Agreed. Barkley's just bitter as fuck he couldn't win a ring. Before Mike got big Barkley failed with Moses & Dr J as teammates, then after Mike retired he failed again with Hakeem & Pippen. Chuck played on loaded teams a majority of his career and won nothing.Madnessssss wrote:barkley is a ringless chump. MJ's Bulls didnt have a dominant big. Still owned Barkley in the finals.
Barkley is always putting Lebron on a similar pedestal as MJ. After defeating Anthony Davis, Dwight Howard, Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph in the playoffs, they beat lebron in the finals. And Green, who Barkley has bashed, put up a triple double in the championship close out game on lebrons home court and won. More impressive than anything Barkley ever accomplished. Not saying Green is better than Barkley, but thats a greater accomplishment than anything Barkley ever did.
Barkley is funny, but he's always greatly annoyed me with his opinions.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Barkley shitted on the warriors back in the day in the 94 playoffs.
-
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 10872
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:08 am
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
It's July. Chuck probably got bored from not seeing his quotes appear in the headlines for a while.
PoLIEtics is for gay fags.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
...and he continued to shit upon them when they made the playoffs in 06-07, and into this year...elmouse03 wrote:Barkley shitted on the warriors back in the day in the 94 playoffs.
...and they just shat in his mouth this season by winning more games than he ever won and winning the title he could never win.
- americaninfidel
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 13968
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Barkley is basketball's Donald Trump.rtiff68 wrote:Honestly, I think a lot of it is just schtick.Madnessssss wrote:barkley is a ringless chump. MJ's Bulls didnt have a dominant big. Still owned Barkley in the finals.
Barkley is always putting Lebron on a similar pedestal as MJ. After defeating Anthony Davis, Dwight Howard, Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph in the playoffs, they beat lebron in the finals. And Green, who Barkley has bashed, put up a triple double in the championship close out game on lebrons home court and won. More impressive than anything Barkley ever accomplished. Not saying Green is better than Barkley, but thats a greater accomplishment than anything Barkley ever did.
Barkely is great at getting a rise out of people, and that's why he's on TV. He's certainly not there for his expert, in-depth analysis.
Fear is the mind killer. We are not afraid.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Hey madness, I think that they all are given a script to read. We and other people, not in the media, argue about many different things basketball related but the media usually say the same thing across the board.Madnessssss wrote:i dunno.....thats skip baylesses schtick. Barkley believes what he says. Whether anybody believes what he says, i dont know. Barkley's constant slurping of lebron is part of why lebron is so overrated by many imo. Hardly goes 5 minutes on any broadcast without saying saying "lebron is the best player in the world" regardless of which teams are playing.rtiff68 wrote:Honestly, I think a lot of it is just schtick.Madnessssss wrote:barkley is a ringless chump. MJ's Bulls didnt have a dominant big. Still owned Barkley in the finals.
Barkley is always putting Lebron on a similar pedestal as MJ. After defeating Anthony Davis, Dwight Howard, Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph in the playoffs, they beat lebron in the finals. And Green, who Barkley has bashed, put up a triple double in the championship close out game on lebrons home court and won. More impressive than anything Barkley ever accomplished. Not saying Green is better than Barkley, but thats a greater accomplishment than anything Barkley ever did.
Barkely is great at getting a rise out of people, and that's why he's on TV. He's certainly not there for his expert, in-depth analysis.
Humans are just not like that so they are bring paid to be robots.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
English pleaseelmerjfudd wrote:Barkley lost with two great big man by his side.rtiff68 wrote:The only time Barkley made it to the Finals, he lost to a team without a dominant big man.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15615
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Do you need pictures deez?King Deez wrote:English pleaseelmerjfudd wrote:Barkley lost with two great big man by his side.rtiff68 wrote:The only time Barkley made it to the Finals, he lost to a team without a dominant big man.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
Nice deflection queerbait.elmerjfudd wrote:Do you need pictures deez?King Deez wrote:English pleaseelmerjfudd wrote:
Barkley lost with two great big man by his side.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15615
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
Why are you always so angry?King Deez wrote:Nice deflection queerbait.elmerjfudd wrote:Do you need pictures deez?King Deez wrote: English please
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
Ask your 2 greatest big "man" in the game lolelmerjfudd wrote:Why are you always so angry?King Deez wrote:Nice deflection queerbait.elmerjfudd wrote: Do you need pictures deez?
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15615
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
So you're angry because I simply made a simple grammar mistake?King Deez wrote:Ask your 2 greatest big "man" in the game lolelmerjfudd wrote:Why are you always so angry?King Deez wrote: Nice deflection queerbait.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
Oh I thought that's how people are voted as cool. I mean ripper does this quite often. Is he not your buddy? Is he stupid for doing that also?elmerjfudd wrote:So you're angry because I simply made a simple grammar mistake?King Deez wrote:Ask your 2 greatest big "man" in the game lolelmerjfudd wrote:
Why are you always so angry?
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15615
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
I rarely talk to ripper.King Deez wrote:Oh I thought that's how people are voted as cool. I mean ripper does this quite often. Is he not your buddy? Is he stupid for doing that also?elmerjfudd wrote:So you're angry because I simply made a simple grammar mistake?King Deez wrote: Ask your 2 greatest big "man" in the game lol
- town bidness
- All-Star
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:41 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
a big "so the fuck what?" to chuck.
anything to attempt to diminish a team competent enough to actually win a ring.
anything to attempt to diminish a team competent enough to actually win a ring.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
Apparently deezna is livid because I pointed out the multiple errors he made in several straight posts yesterday that made him sound like a neanderthal.King Deez wrote:Oh I thought that's how people are voted as cool. I mean ripper does this quite often. Is he not your buddy? Is he stupid for doing that also?elmerjfudd wrote:So you're angry because I simply made a simple grammar mistake?King Deez wrote: Ask your 2 greatest big "man" in the game lol
He's still shook.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any
So once again a typo is now a big deal? Who would have thought.ripper76 wrote:Apparently deezna is livid because I pointed out the multiple errors he made in several straight posts yesterday that made him sound like a neanderthal.King Deez wrote:Oh I thought that's how people are voted as cool. I mean ripper does this quite often. Is he not your buddy? Is he stupid for doing that also?elmerjfudd wrote:
So you're angry because I simply made a simple grammar mistake?
He's still shook.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Barkley doesn't have the greatest of analytical abilities.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.