Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Apparently it will just never ever count unless you beat a prime Shaq, Hakeem, or DRob.
- zombiesonics
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 32840
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:56 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
"Anthony Davis is a scrub"
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Max. wrote:Hes buttthurt that Davis is already better than he ever was.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
So AD is already better than Barkley ever was, okay.Max. wrote:You can't be this retarded.Smelters wrote:Max. wrote:Hes buttthurt that Davis is already better than he ever was.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
So AD Is already better than Barkley ever was?Max. wrote:You understand now. Good.Smelters wrote:So AD is already better than Barkley ever was, okay.Max. wrote:
You can't be this retarded.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Barkley has always hated on the Warriors, but now he's just being silly.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
So AD is already better than Barkley ever was?Max. wrote:Smelters you need to put the pipe down. I will not go in circles with you.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
The only time Barkley made it to the Finals, he lost to a team without a dominant big man.
- zombiesonics
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 32840
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:56 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
rtiff68 wrote:The only time Barkley made it to the Finals, he lost to a team without a dominant big man.
- 876Stephen
- Fantasy Football Champ
- Posts: 7697
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:22 pm
- Location: San Rafael, California
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
What's funny, is that Barkley was propping up the grizzlies all year. He said they were the favorites all year because they had the best frontcourt in the nba.
Barkley is a hypocrite and an idiot plain and simple.
Barkley is a hypocrite and an idiot plain and simple.
- PhutureDynasty
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 32403
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:14 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Don't speak ill of Sir Charles.876Stephen wrote:What's funny, is that Barkley was propping up the grizzlies all year. He said they were the favorites all year because they had the best frontcourt in the nba.
Barkley is a hypocrite and an idiot plain and simple.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15581
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Barkley lost with two great big man by his side.rtiff68 wrote:The only time Barkley made it to the Finals, he lost to a team without a dominant big man.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Not only did Charles go through dominant big men, he also ruined godzilla.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
As much as Barkley loves to hate on GSW, I couldn't believe he went after Draymond earlier this year. An undersized PF who went way later than he should have (in retrospect) in the draft and who is an intense competitor who runs his mouth?
Projecting much, Chuck?
Projecting much, Chuck?
- thatoothpick45
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 17223
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:44 am
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Max is a kid, never saw a prime Sir Charles.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Maxine you must know a lot about not being able to sit down the day after.Max. wrote:Its going to be hard for smelters to sit down tomorrow after this ass pounding.
So AD is already better than CB ever was?
- PhutureDynasty
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 32403
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:14 pm
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
You don't hear me trashing Rivers or Draymond.Max. wrote:Charles is alright. At least he's not as big of a piece of shit as Iverson or McNabb.PhutureDynasty wrote:Don't speak ill of Sir Charles.876Stephen wrote:What's funny, is that Barkley was propping up the grizzlies all year. He said they were the favorites all year because they had the best frontcourt in the nba.
Barkley is a hypocrite and an idiot plain and simple.
Lay off the Answer.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
GSW had an historically great season on many levels.
Chuck should just stfu on this.
Chuck should just stfu on this.
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
If Chuck apologizes, I bet Draymond would let him hold his ring.vcsgrizzfan wrote:GSW had an historically great season on many levels.
Chuck should just stfu on this.
- Da Stars.
- Tight wad. Penny pincher. Mr. Dollar Theater.
- Posts: 36137
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:51 am
Re: Barkley thinks the W's didn't have to go through any "dominant big men" these playoffs
Double post on this. Wow pal.vcsgrizzfan wrote:GSW had an historically great season on many levels.
Chuck should just stfu on this.