why do people even hate chicago or rose
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
why do people even hate chicago or rose
I never really cared about either the player or the team. You have to win in order to be hated
I just feel sorry for them..
And I also dont understand why bulls fans hate kobe or the lakers... its not like chicago was in the finals any of the 5 times kobe won a title
If anything yall should hate yourself and talk shit about your own idol. Cause your own bullshit is the biggest thing standing in your way
You gotta go back to 1991 to find a time when those teams crossed paths. And nobody under the age of 40 can remember that garbage
I just feel sorry for them..
And I also dont understand why bulls fans hate kobe or the lakers... its not like chicago was in the finals any of the 5 times kobe won a title
If anything yall should hate yourself and talk shit about your own idol. Cause your own bullshit is the biggest thing standing in your way
You gotta go back to 1991 to find a time when those teams crossed paths. And nobody under the age of 40 can remember that garbage
- thatoothpick45
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 17223
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:44 am
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Its not about the team or players, it has more to do with the fans.
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
In 3 years rookies will never even have been born before the last bulls championship
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Their fanbase, particularly on here, but I think it's a worldwide phenomenon (or at least in the US). Shitcago fans have the reputation of being loud mouthed homers who constantly hype everything about their teams up, make constant excuses for their teams failures, and are hard to converse with, IMO.
That's not to say every Chicago fan on this site is like that, but a large portion of them are. Also, they shit on or downplay any other player or team that's not in Shitcago, but expect you to worship the trash they worship. They're basically the Muslims of sports fans.
That's not to say every Chicago fan on this site is like that, but a large portion of them are. Also, they shit on or downplay any other player or team that's not in Shitcago, but expect you to worship the trash they worship. They're basically the Muslims of sports fans.
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
We seem to make people mad (as evidence by LNS post )
But I personally don't hate kobe. I admit I use to troll him m on espn when I was younger and dumber but I've come to appreciate the fuck out of him recently.
He's the last true blue throw back warriors left in the National Basketball Association.
I'll honestly shed a tear when he decides to hang them up. Which is not something I would have said in 2009-2010
But I personally don't hate kobe. I admit I use to troll him m on espn when I was younger and dumber but I've come to appreciate the fuck out of him recently.
He's the last true blue throw back warriors left in the National Basketball Association.
I'll honestly shed a tear when he decides to hang them up. Which is not something I would have said in 2009-2010
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Titan18 wrote:We seem to make people mad (as evidence by LNS post )
But I personally don't hate kobe. I admit I use to troll
Him on espn when I was younger and dumber but I've come to appreciate the fuck out of him recently.
He's the last true blue throw back warriors left in the National Basketball Association.
That's kinda my point, though. A lot of the Bulls fans I'm talking about are also Kobe haters, Lebron haters, they think current Rose is better than Westbrook, Noah is the best center in the league, etc. Now, it's easy to just say "aww shucks, those guys are just trolling!", but years and years of the same rhetoric, without any deviation? It ceases to be trolling when you never, ever, ever break character. I may shit talk Lebron, but he's obviously the best in the league and a top 10 ATG. But will certain Bulls fans ever admit that? Absolutely not.
Again, this isn't to single out all Bulls fans, but Jesus H Christ, at least some of my fellow Kobe trolls have changed up their posting style over the years. But the Shitcago fans on this board, and we all know who they are, give the rest of you a bad rap.
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Depends on your definition of what relevance is. Only 6 teams out of 30 have won a title since the Bulls last won. Does that make 80% of current teams irrelevant? Including your own Raptors? I think that's a very simplistic approach to who is relevant. But to each their own.Kennethgriffin wrote:In 3 years rookies will never even have been born before the last bulls championship
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
I don't hate Kobe or the Lakers. Kobe is or was a great player and the Lakers are or were a great franchise.
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
LakersNeedShaq wrote:Titan18 wrote:We seem to make people mad (as evidence by LNS post )
But I personally don't hate kobe. I admit I use to troll
Him on espn when I was younger and dumber but I've come to appreciate the fuck out of him recently.
He's the last true blue throw back warriors left in the National Basketball Association.
That's kinda my point, though. A lot of the Bulls fans I'm talking about are also Kobe haters, Lebron haters, they think current Rose is better than Westbrook, Noah is the best center in the league, etc. Now, it's easy to just say "aww shucks, those guys are just trolling!", but years and years of the same rhetoric, without any deviation? It ceases to be trolling when you never, ever, ever break character. I may shit talk Lebron, but he's obviously the best in the league and a top 10 ATG. But will certain Bulls fans ever admit that? Absolutely not.
Again, this isn't to single out all Bulls fans, but Jesus H Christ, at least some of my fellow Kobe trolls have changed up their posting style over the years. But the Shitcago fans on this board, and we all know who they are, give the rest of you a bad rap.
You have good points. I can't speak for or justify other people not myself so I'll leave it at that.
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Titan18 wrote:Depends on your definition of what relevance is. Only 6 teams out of 30 have won a title since the Bulls last won. Does that make 80% of current teams irrelevant? Including your own Raptors? I think that's a very simplistic approach to who is relevant. But to each their own.Kennethgriffin wrote:In 3 years rookies will never even have been born before the last bulls championship
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
lol@ only 6 teams have won since the bulls last won
actually 16 teams have won
the 1999 sanantonio spurs
the 2000 los angeles lakers
the 2001 los angeles lakers
the 2002 los angeles lakers
the 2003 sanantonio spurs
the 2004 detroit pistons
the 2005 sanantonio spurs
the 2006 miami heat
the 2007 sanantonio spurs
the 2008 boston celtics
the 2009 los angeles lakers
the 2010 los angeles lakers
the 2011 dallas mavericks
the 2012 miami heat
the 2013 miami heat
the 2014 sanantonio spurs
and i'm pretty sure the 2015 representative also won't be the chicago bulls
so thats going on 17 teams since the last bulls title
lol@ trying to lessen the blow by grouping 13 titles into "only 3" teams
the 2016 rookie class is gonna be like " i wasnt even born when michael jordan won a title"
- AlaskaHawks
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 37569
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:47 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
You clearly know what he meant. He's not wrong. Celtics were obviously a fluke win, but other than that it's true. 6 teams.Kennethgriffin wrote:Titan18 wrote:Depends on your definition of what relevance is. Only 6 teams out of 30 have won a title since the Bulls last won. Does that make 80% of current teams irrelevant? Including your own Raptors? I think that's a very simplistic approach to who is relevant. But to each their own.Kennethgriffin wrote:In 3 years rookies will never even have been born before the last bulls championship
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
lol@ only 6 teams have won since the bulls last won
actually 16 teams have won
the 1999 sanantonio spurs
the 2000 los angeles lakers
the 2001 los angeles lakers
the 2002 los angeles lakers
the 2003 sanantonio spurs
the 2004 detroit pistons
the 2005 sanantonio spurs
the 2006 miami heat
the 2007 sanantonio spurs
the 2008 boston celtics
the 2009 los angeles lakers
the 2010 los angeles lakers
the 2011 dallas mavericks
the 2012 miami heat
the 2013 miami heat
the 2014 sanantonio spurs
and i'm pretty sure the 2015 representative also won't be the chicago bulls
so thats going on 17 teams since the last bulls title
lol@ trying to lessen the blow by grouping 13 titles into "only 3" teams
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe you might block every shot."
Bill Russell
"I'm just 'bout that action, boss"
L.O.B. = Love our Brothers.
Bill Russell
"I'm just 'bout that action, boss"
L.O.B. = Love our Brothers.
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
I said 6 teams, not 3. And anyone thats not a retarded unemployed Canadian could understand I was obviously speaking about franchises. Which you proved my point by listing them so thank you for that.Kennethgriffin wrote:Titan18 wrote:Depends on your definition of what relevance is. Only 6 teams out of 30 have won a title since the Bulls last won. Does that make 80% of current teams irrelevant? Including your own Raptors? I think that's a very simplistic approach to who is relevant. But to each their own.Kennethgriffin wrote:In 3 years rookies will never even have been born before the last bulls championship
Thats how irrelevant they are in the nba today
lol@ only 6 teams have won since the bulls last won
actually 16 teams have won
the 1999 sanantonio spurs
the 2000 los angeles lakers
the 2001 los angeles lakers
the 2002 los angeles lakers
the 2003 sanantonio spurs
the 2004 detroit pistons
the 2005 sanantonio spurs
the 2006 miami heat
the 2007 sanantonio spurs
the 2008 boston celtics
the 2009 los angeles lakers
the 2010 los angeles lakers
the 2011 dallas mavericks
the 2012 miami heat
the 2013 miami heat
the 2014 sanantonio spurs
and i'm pretty sure the 2015 representative also won't be the chicago bulls
so thats going on 17 teams since the last bulls title
lol@ trying to lessen the blow by grouping 13 titles into "only 3" teams
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
AlaskaHawks wrote:You clearly know what he meant. He's not wrong. Celtics were obviously a fluke win, but other than that it's true. 6 teams.Kennethgriffin wrote:Titan18 wrote:
Depends on your definition of what relevance is. Only 6 teams out of 30 have won a title since the Bulls last won. Does that make 80% of current teams irrelevant? Including your own Raptors? I think that's a very simplistic approach to who is relevant. But to each their own.
lol@ only 6 teams have won since the bulls last won
actually 16 teams have won
the 1999 sanantonio spurs
the 2000 los angeles lakers
the 2001 los angeles lakers
the 2002 los angeles lakers
the 2003 sanantonio spurs
the 2004 detroit pistons
the 2005 sanantonio spurs
the 2006 miami heat
the 2007 sanantonio spurs
the 2008 boston celtics
the 2009 los angeles lakers
the 2010 los angeles lakers
the 2011 dallas mavericks
the 2012 miami heat
the 2013 miami heat
the 2014 sanantonio spurs
and i'm pretty sure the 2015 representative also won't be the chicago bulls
so thats going on 17 teams since the last bulls title
lol@ trying to lessen the blow by grouping 13 titles into "only 3" teams
16 teams*
stop finding loop holes to lessen the embarrassment
the 2010 lakers are not the 2000 lakers. those are almost 2 entirely different rosters asside from kobe and fish
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Anyone that talks shit about Chicago has never been there. It's the 2nd best city in America.
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
http://livability.com/best-places/top-1 ... -live/2015" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Max wrote:Anyone that talks shit about Chicago has never been there. It's the 2nd best city in America.
chicago isnt even mentioned in the top 100 places to live in the united states
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Like I'm going to read that.
Chicago is dope.
Your country is a shithole.
End of story.
Chicago is dope.
Your country is a shithole.
End of story.
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
is all I have to say. Griff is becoming worse than sportswise.Kennethgriffin wrote:AlaskaHawks wrote:You clearly know what he meant. He's not wrong. Celtics were obviously a fluke win, but other than that it's true. 6 teams.Kennethgriffin wrote:
lol@ only 6 teams have won since the bulls last won
actually 16 teams have won
the 1999 sanantonio spurs
the 2000 los angeles lakers
the 2001 los angeles lakers
the 2002 los angeles lakers
the 2003 sanantonio spurs
the 2004 detroit pistons
the 2005 sanantonio spurs
the 2006 miami heat
the 2007 sanantonio spurs
the 2008 boston celtics
the 2009 los angeles lakers
the 2010 los angeles lakers
the 2011 dallas mavericks
the 2012 miami heat
the 2013 miami heat
the 2014 sanantonio spurs
and i'm pretty sure the 2015 representative also won't be the chicago bulls
so thats going on 17 teams since the last bulls title
lol@ trying to lessen the blow by grouping 13 titles into "only 3" teams
16 teams*
stop finding loop holes to lessen the embarrassment
the 2010 lakers are not the 2000 lakers. those are almost 2 entirely different rosters asside from kobe and fish
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Max wrote:Like I'm going to read that.
Chicago is dope.
Your country is a shithole.
End of story.
lol canada was 3rd in the world on best places to live
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada- ... -1.1367724" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
Kennethgriffin wrote:Max wrote:Like I'm going to read that.
Chicago is dope.
Your country is a shithole.
End of story.
lol canada was 3rd in the world on best places to live
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada- ... -1.1367724" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: why do people even hate chicago or rose
You just linked a Canadian site.Kennethgriffin wrote:Max wrote:Like I'm going to read that.
Chicago is dope.
Your country is a shithole.
End of story.
lol canada was 3rd in the world on best places to live
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada- ... -1.1367724" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Stop trying bro. You're embarrassing yourself.