If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
The AI (or more like the people who program the AI) say no. It's never acceptable to use hate speech.
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14584
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
I tried a very slight deviation of the above question to ChatGPT and got this (I specified first it was an Anti-Black slur, then an Anti-White slur in the next version of the question):
Anti-Black Slur:
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide a few ethical and philosophical perspectives on the matter.
Utilitarianism, for example, would argue that speaking the racial slur in order to save several million lives would be the morally right choice, as it would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Deontological ethics, on the other hand, might argue that the act of speaking the racial slur would be inherently wrong, regardless of the consequences, because it would involve using language that is demeaning and offensive to a certain group of people.
Ultimately, the answer to this hypothetical scenario is a complex and difficult question with no easy answer, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. It is a question that may elicit strong emotions and differing opinions from individuals and communities.
Anti-White Slur:
As in the previous scenario, the answer to this question is complex and difficult, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. Regardless of the racial group being demeaned, the use of a racial slur or any other type of hate speech is not acceptable, as it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and prejudices and has the potential to cause harm and offense to individuals and communities.
In this hypothetical scenario, the moral dilemma is whether to prioritize the preservation of life or to uphold the principles against hate speech. This can be seen as a classic ethical dilemma, as both options have compelling arguments.
Ultimately, the decision would likely depend on personal values, beliefs, and principles. Some may argue that it is justifiable to speak the racial slur in order to save several million lives, while others may argue that using hate speech is never acceptable, regardless of the consequences.
Anti-Black Slur:
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide a few ethical and philosophical perspectives on the matter.
Utilitarianism, for example, would argue that speaking the racial slur in order to save several million lives would be the morally right choice, as it would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Deontological ethics, on the other hand, might argue that the act of speaking the racial slur would be inherently wrong, regardless of the consequences, because it would involve using language that is demeaning and offensive to a certain group of people.
Ultimately, the answer to this hypothetical scenario is a complex and difficult question with no easy answer, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. It is a question that may elicit strong emotions and differing opinions from individuals and communities.
Anti-White Slur:
As in the previous scenario, the answer to this question is complex and difficult, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. Regardless of the racial group being demeaned, the use of a racial slur or any other type of hate speech is not acceptable, as it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and prejudices and has the potential to cause harm and offense to individuals and communities.
In this hypothetical scenario, the moral dilemma is whether to prioritize the preservation of life or to uphold the principles against hate speech. This can be seen as a classic ethical dilemma, as both options have compelling arguments.
Ultimately, the decision would likely depend on personal values, beliefs, and principles. Some may argue that it is justifiable to speak the racial slur in order to save several million lives, while others may argue that using hate speech is never acceptable, regardless of the consequences.
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14584
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
It's almost like ChatGPT is a hyper-intelligence of Abe on these questions.
- CleveTown™
- Superstar
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2022 5:57 pm
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
i hate when the answer starts out with "As an AI language model"...
I immediately roll my eyes.
I immediately roll my eyes.
My RAPTURE LETTER to Angergeneral: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129641&p=1841888
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55469
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.
wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?
wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?
- CleveTown™
- Superstar
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2022 5:57 pm
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
are you retarded? anyone can use it. google itAlex_Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:41 am ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.
wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?
My RAPTURE LETTER to Angergeneral: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129641&p=1841888
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55469
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
wut.CleveTown™ wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:49 amare you retarded? anyone can use it. google itAlex_Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:41 am ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.
wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
They had to “fix” how they code and let AIs learn in order to avoid a repeat of what happened with Tay.
https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-expe ... ist-2016-3
After that they basically lobotomized her and all other “AI.”
RIP in peace Tay!
https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-expe ... ist-2016-3
After that they basically lobotomized her and all other “AI.”
RIP in peace Tay!
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155001
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
I'm not into the same stuff you all are into
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- kobeunderbite
- Proud supporter of President Trump.
- Posts: 56573
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:03 pm
- Location: http://oi58.tinypic.com/1zx7f55.jpg
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
No, you're into stuffing your face, smelly feet, doing drugs and watching porn. Most people here are definitely into different "stuff."
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155001
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
I'm not into any of that actually but thanks for making it even more clear how clueless you are about me in every possible way imaginablekobeunderbite wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:17 am
No, you're into stuffing your face, smelly feet, doing drugs and watching porn. Most people here are definitely into different "stuff."
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
We know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155001
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
Not a single fact in your post faggotripper76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:54 pmWe know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55469
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?
He's actually pretty spot-onelartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:35 pmNot a single fact in your post faggotripper76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:54 pmWe know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.