2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Talk about anything here.
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

rtiff68 wrote:Outside of Christian Laettner (who doesn't count), there's only one member of the original Dream Team who has yet to make this list.

He averaged 18/4/4 over the course of his 13 year career-- during his prime, he averaged 25+ for 5 straight seasons.

My completely objective vote is for Chris Mullin.
Good dream team reminder.
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

LOL I am glad I missed most of the Tmac election thread.
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

Jamaal Wilkes does not get there. Career PER of only like 16, even less in the playoffs. Ginobli gets the nod easily in a comparison of 2/3 dogs.
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

Same goes for Nixon.
User avatar
Y2K
One Mizzou. Then. Now. Always.
Posts: 21199
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:23 am
Location: Texas

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Y2K »

I'm going out on a limb and voting for Grant Hill. Ben Wallace is a worthy candidate but peak for peak, I'd take Hill's overall game over Ben's very stout defense.
Image


I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
User avatar
Y2K
One Mizzou. Then. Now. Always.
Posts: 21199
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:23 am
Location: Texas

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Y2K »

Voting for the round closes at 10 pm CST.
Image


I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
elmouse03
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 37076
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by elmouse03 »

Ben Wallace's defense on Shaq from 04-07 was pretty damn amazing.
User avatar
rtiff68
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7530
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:14 am

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by rtiff68 »

Please love my Mullin, damn it!
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

rtiff68 wrote:Please love my Mullin, damn it!
He may have a chance to crack the top 50 in this project, but you have to make the case still. I mean he made the dream team because you have to have that 3 point specialiat in international ball, and Bird had a bad back, so although I like your angle, the voters may need more.
User avatar
Robceltsfan
Pick 'Em League Champion
Posts: 52872
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
Location: Hampton Roads, VA

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Robceltsfan »

If you want Mullin in I'll get him in.

What are you offering?
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.

~George Carlin~
User avatar
Y2K
One Mizzou. Then. Now. Always.
Posts: 21199
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:23 am
Location: Texas

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Y2K »

Odogg wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:Please love my Mullin, damn it!
He may have a chance to crack the top 50 in this project, but you have to make the case still. I mean he made the dream team because you have to have that 3 point specialiat in international ball, and Bird had a bad back, so although I like your angle, the voters may need more.
:10:
Image


I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
User avatar
dwcmwa
All-Time Great
Posts: 13744
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:20 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by dwcmwa »

I'd go with Mully here.

But the biased-ty continues here with no mention of Rose.


Youngest MVP Ever and even though he's been derailed by injuries so was G. Hill but he still has a spot here AND he never won an MVP.
Image

Image
User avatar
Robceltsfan
Pick 'Em League Champion
Posts: 52872
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
Location: Hampton Roads, VA

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Robceltsfan »

dwcmwa wrote:I'd go with Mully here.

But the biased-ty continues here with no mention of Rose.


Youngest MVP Ever and even though he's been derailed by injuries so was G. Hill but he still has a spot here AND he never won an MVP.
Rose would be lucky to make a top 100 list.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.

~George Carlin~
User avatar
rtiff68
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7530
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:14 am

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by rtiff68 »

Odogg wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:Please love my Mullin, damn it!
He may have a chance to crack the top 50 in this project, but you have to make the case still. I mean he made the dream team because you have to have that 3 point specialiat in international ball, and Bird had a bad back, so although I like your angle, the voters may need more.
In all honesty, I don't have a problem with anyone going Mullin, Wallace, or Billups (extremely underrated player in my opinion-- something that advanced metrics support) here. That said, consider this a case for Mullin: all 3 of the players below had long careers as NBA wings. Their career per game numbers are as follows...

Player A:

17.1ppg / 5.0rebs / 2.7asts / 1.2stls; .438 / .370 / .707

Player B:

18.2ppg / 3.0rebs / 3.0asts / .8stls; .471 / .395 / .888

Player C:

18.2ppg / 4.5rebs / 3.5asts / 1.6stls; .509 / .384 / .865


For Player A and Player B, the majority of the years they played hovered right around their career averages. In sharp contrast, Player C had a 5 year stretch where he averaged 25+ppg and shot over 50% from the field every time. Player B scored the most career points because he played 4+ more seasons than the other two players (even though all 3 had fairly long careers, relatively speaking).

Player A is Jason RIchardson, who hasn't and won't come anywhere near this list. Player B is Reggie Miller, who is #41...

...and Player C is, shockingly, Chris Mullin. Do we really value career volume statistics THAT much if said player's peak is nowhere close to a comparable player's?

Final, interesting and timely note: the only advantage Kobe Bryant really has over Michael Jordan career-wise is the fact that he accumulated higher totals because he played longer and he had a slight edge in 3-point shooting. If you replaced "Kobe Bryant" with "Reggie Miller" and "Michael Jordan" with "Chris Mullin," the previous sentence would ring every bit as true...

...and yet we have Reggie approximately 10 spots ahead of Chris and Jordan 6 spots ahead of Kobe.
User avatar
Odogg
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by Odogg »

Thanks. But didnt reggie have a lot more playoff success than mullin?
User avatar
rtiff68
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7530
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:14 am

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by rtiff68 »

Odogg wrote:Thanks. But didnt reggie have a lot more playoff success than mullin?
Sure, but he also had WAY more opportunities because he played on much better teams. Again, that's not Miller's fault, and team circumstances obviously impact every player on this list, but it should at least be brought up. For the record, when Mullin did get there during his peak, he performed at an extremely high level.
User avatar
rtiff68
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7530
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:14 am

Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #47

Post by rtiff68 »

Another note: it was suggested earlier that Mullin was on the original Dream Team only because they needed another 3-point shooter. For the record, both Mullin and Miller were peaking at the time the team was picked, Miller was a slightly better 3-point shooter, and Mullin is only 2 years older (so it wasn't an "age" thing).

:)
Post Reply