![Image](http://cdn04.cdn.thesuperficial.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/17/rachel-bilson-bikini-hayden-christensen-0417-11-435x580.jpg)
![Image](http://cdn03.cdn.thesuperficial.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/17/rachel-bilson-bikini-hayden-christensen-0417-580x435.jpg)
![Image](http://cdn02.cdn.thesuperficial.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/17/rachel-bilson-bikini-hayden-christensen-0417-1-435x580.jpg)
![Image](http://www.unomatch.com/file/pic/photo/2014/01/122f75d93921f645e828a1124bccd60b_1024.jpg)
10kobeunderbite wrote:Does that gif have a numeric 1-10 value?dunkan4rings wrote:
Incognito wrote:Beautiful girl unlike the livestock shaped ghetto slut Smelters was beating his pud over.
10/10 body
9/10 face (judging by the pic provided)
Without makeup, 8kobeunderbite wrote:Incognito wrote:Beautiful girl unlike the livestock shaped ghetto slut Smelters was beating his pud over.
10/10 body
9/10 face (judging by the pic provided)
Without makeup, still cute:
Stupid post againelartman1973 wrote:Yes
deezna10 wrote:Stupid post againelartman1973 wrote:Yes
Wow those are some high marks for a regular chick. I bet you the chick that I was throwing up would get more attention from men (and women) than this chick, matter of fact, I guarantee that.Incognito wrote:Beautiful girl unlike the livestock shaped ghetto slut Smelters was beating his pud over.
10/10 body
9/10 face (judging by the pic provided)
dunkan4rings wrote:Without makeup, 8kobeunderbite wrote:Incognito wrote:Beautiful girl unlike the livestock shaped ghetto slut Smelters was beating his pud over.
10/10 body
9/10 face (judging by the pic provided)
Without makeup, still cute:
Oh please...Smelters wrote:dunkan4rings wrote:Without makeup, 8kobeunderbite wrote:
Without makeup, still cute:
I gave her a 7 maybe an 8 if she is good in bed. Above average chick, nothing really exciting.Titan18 wrote:Oh please...Smelters wrote:dunkan4rings wrote: Without makeup, 8