Not appreciating beautiful womens feet is whats weird actually
So, do you suck toes or lick toes? Do women stick their foot in your ass? Do women jack you off with their feet?
Please, help me understand how women's feet are worthy of appreciation.
Nicely kept feet means a nicely kept vagina..
Feet are also very sexy...nice one that is..cant stand ugly feet..a hot chick with ugly feet is a huge turn off
elartman1973 wrote:
Not appreciating beautiful womens feet is whats weird actually
So, do you suck toes or lick toes? Do women stick their foot in your ass? Do women jack you off with their feet?
Please, help me understand how women's feet are worthy of appreciation.
Nicely kept feet means a nicely kept vagina..
Feet are also very sexy...nice one that is..cant stand ugly feet..a hot chick with ugly feet is a huge turn off
Kobeunderbite wrote:Guy A is deeply conflicted and torn between good and evil, Guy B is manipulating guy A into being evil. It's definitely not a stretch to peg B as the villain.
We're just getting into semantics, though. Kylo Ren did bad things and made things difficult for the good guys, so in that sense he was villainous. That we can probably all agree on. I just don't think that he is necessarily the villain. Heck, even Han and Leia thought he was redeemable after he had slaughtered everyone in that jedi temple along with countless others en route to becoming a First Order leader.
Agreed that it is a lot of semantics.
Here's one angle: Is there a movie without the Kylo Ren character? Is there one without Snoke?
I get the long game angle. But these movies MUST work individually as well.
Kobeunderbite wrote:Guy A is deeply conflicted and torn between good and evil, Guy B is manipulating guy A into being evil. It's definitely not a stretch to peg B as the villain.
We're just getting into semantics, though. Kylo Ren did bad things and made things difficult for the good guys, so in that sense he was villainous. That we can probably all agree on. I just don't think that he is necessarily the villain. Heck, even Han and Leia thought he was redeemable after he had slaughtered everyone in that jedi temple along with countless others en route to becoming a First Order leader.
Agreed that it is a lot of semantics.
Here's one angle: Is there a movie without the Kylo Ren character? Is there one without Snoke?
I get the long game angle. But these movies MUST work individually as well.
I disagree. That may have been the case in the 70's....but in this day of "epic trilogies" that just isn't the case anymore.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
The movie does work fairly well on its own, but if you want an explanation for why Ren is too "emo" or doesn't come across the same way Vader did in Episode IV, it's because of where Ren is at developmentally in the larger story arc.
ripper76 wrote:The movie does work fairly well on its own, but if you want an explanation for why Ren is too "emo" or doesn't come across the same way Vader did in Episode IV, it's because of where Ren is at developmentally in the larger story arc.
Vader had his "dark moment" when he killed Windu in Episode III....years before Episode IV. Ren had his dark moment IN this movie....not the prior episode.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
Kobeunderbite wrote:Guy A is deeply conflicted and torn between good and evil, Guy B is manipulating guy A into being evil. It's definitely not a stretch to peg B as the villain.
We're just getting into semantics, though. Kylo Ren did bad things and made things difficult for the good guys, so in that sense he was villainous. That we can probably all agree on. I just don't think that he is necessarily the villain. Heck, even Han and Leia thought he was redeemable after he had slaughtered everyone in that jedi temple along with countless others en route to becoming a First Order leader.
Agreed that it is a lot of semantics.
Here's one angle: Is there a movie without the Kylo Ren character? Is there one without Snoke?
I get the long game angle. But these movies MUST work individually as well.
I understand what you're saying, but Kylo Ren is a sympathetic character and still would be in a self-contained film. Grey, not black/white. With that being said, he is definitely the antagonist of TFA.
Robceltsfan wrote:
So, do you suck toes or lick toes? Do women stick their foot in your ass? Do women jack you off with their feet?
Please, help me understand how women's feet are worthy of appreciation.
Nicely kept feet means a nicely kept vagina..
Feet are also very sexy...nice one that is..cant stand ugly feet..a hot chick with ugly feet is a huge turn off
elartman1973 wrote:
Nicely kept feet means a nicely kept vagina..
Feet are also very sexy...nice one that is..cant stand ugly feet..a hot chick with ugly feet is a huge turn off
Kobeunderbite wrote:Guy A is deeply conflicted and torn between good and evil, Guy B is manipulating guy A into being evil. It's definitely not a stretch to peg B as the villain.
We're just getting into semantics, though. Kylo Ren did bad things and made things difficult for the good guys, so in that sense he was villainous. That we can probably all agree on. I just don't think that he is necessarily the villain. Heck, even Han and Leia thought he was redeemable after he had slaughtered everyone in that jedi temple along with countless others en route to becoming a First Order leader.
Agreed that it is a lot of semantics.
Here's one angle: Is there a movie without the Kylo Ren character? Is there one without Snoke?
I get the long game angle. But these movies MUST work individually as well.
I disagree. That may have been the case in the 70's....but in this day of "epic trilogies" that just isn't the case anymore.
I'm getting confused. I'm not very smart, I guess.
I apologize for not understanding that Snoke, while being the ringleader, is the villain despite only appearing in hologram form and interacting with two people. And not the guy driving the action for 2 hours.
I'm only being slightly facetious. Again, probably comes down to semantics.
Here's one angle: Is there a movie without the Kylo Ren character? Is there one without Snoke?
I get the long game angle. But these movies MUST work individually as well.
I disagree. That may have been the case in the 70's....but in this day of "epic trilogies" that just isn't the case anymore.
I'm getting confused. I'm not very smart, I guess.
I apologize for not understanding that Snoke, while being the ringleader, is the villain despite only appearing in hologram form and interacting with two people. And not the guy driving the action for 2 hours.
I'm only being slightly facetious. Again, probably comes down to semantics.
The answer is in the middle. I agree that Ren is A villain, but to me he's not THE villain. Episode IV was made as a stand-alone film and Vader was the villain of that movie....even though the next two episodes (and eventually the prior three) saw that it was Palpatine/The Emperor that was pulling all the strings.
Knowing that history, and knowing that there are two films still to follow TFA, makes it pretty simple for one to assume that Snoke is the true villain of the trilogy.
Maybe we'll be surprised by a twist? I doubt it though...
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
I think everyone understands each other. It's not wrong to call Kylo Ren the villain, it just feels a tad disingenuous to label him as such because we know he won't be the ultimate villain of the story and we know that he is nowhere near pure evil.