Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Everyone wants all these tests and backgrounds, exams whatever to make sure people are sane to be able to buy guns. What about Police Officers? It seems we have more nuts with power trips going on with police officers too. Not sure what they all have to pass to get their jobs but I think they need to go through as much as any individual purchasing a gun.
- Robceltsfan
- Pick 'Em League Champion
- Posts: 52829
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
- Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Most PDs have extensive background checks and mental examinations done on any applicant being considered for hire.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
~George Carlin~
~George Carlin~
- Johnnyblazzed
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8448
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:35 am
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Sometimes you wonder if they even use the data when they make the hire.Robceltsfan wrote:Most PDs have extensive background checks and mental examinations done on any applicant being considered for hire.
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Doesn't seem to be working all the time then does it? Maybe all these mental exams won't necessarily matter for those who buy guns either?Robceltsfan wrote:Most PDs have extensive background checks and mental examinations done on any applicant being considered for hire.
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
You aren't sure what an assault weapon is?Max. wrote:What falls into the category of "assault weapon?"
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Most PDs have background checks and screening that are significantly more extensive than all but the most strict anti-gun states.
The problem is that after they pass through these reasonable filters, they are given a (virtual) monopoly on the enforcement of the law, legalized use of aggression, etc...along with burdens most normal people don't face....along with virtually no check on misuse of aggression outside the absolute and most obvious cases of abuse (i.e. - if it's anything even close to a grey area, the default is automatically set to "cops right, cops good" w/ respect to the parties who have the abilities to direct punish cops).
Combine those issues and you have a fairly combustible situation.
The problem is that after they pass through these reasonable filters, they are given a (virtual) monopoly on the enforcement of the law, legalized use of aggression, etc...along with burdens most normal people don't face....along with virtually no check on misuse of aggression outside the absolute and most obvious cases of abuse (i.e. - if it's anything even close to a grey area, the default is automatically set to "cops right, cops good" w/ respect to the parties who have the abilities to direct punish cops).
Combine those issues and you have a fairly combustible situation.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
- Johnnyblazzed
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8448
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:35 am
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
King Deez wrote:You aren't sure what an assault weapon is?Max. wrote:What falls into the category of "assault weapon?"
The media definition is far different than the actual definition. I believe Max is merely asking what you consider an assault weapon.
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
The mainstream media's definition of an assault weapon is "a big scary thing that go boom and make me pee-pee in my pants".
I've seen this exact definition in multiple mainstream outlets.
I've seen this exact definition in multiple mainstream outlets.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
an AR, AK, etc. Semi automatic with magazines that carry large capacity is what I consider an assault weapon. Pistols are not assault weapons. A deer rifle bolt action or even 5 round semi automatic rifle is not an assault weapon.Johnnyblazzed wrote:King Deez wrote:You aren't sure what an assault weapon is?Max. wrote:What falls into the category of "assault weapon?"
The media definition is far different than the actual definition. I believe Max is merely asking what you consider an assault weapon.
- Johnnyblazzed
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8448
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:35 am
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Bush4Ever wrote:The mainstream media's definition of an assault weapon is "a big scary thing that go boom and make me pee-pee in my pants".
I've seen this exact definition in multiple mainstream outlets.
It's funny 'cause it's true.
- LeBronMonsterDunk
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 54855
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:19 am
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
You just described the opposite of an "assault weapon", which BTW is a term made up by the media.King Deez wrote:an AR, AK, etc. Semi automatic with magazines that carry large capacity is what I consider an assault weapon. Pistols are not assault weapons. A deer rifle bolt action or even 5 round semi automatic rifle is not an assault weapon.Johnnyblazzed wrote:King Deez wrote: You aren't sure what an assault weapon is?
The media definition is far different than the actual definition. I believe Max is merely asking what you consider an assault weapon.
You never liked me, probably don't like me still, but a ***** liking me aint never paid my bills
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
Are you retarded? I described the "opposite" LMAO, No i really fucking didn't but holy fuck why weren't you on the boards dumbest poster poll?LeBronMonsterDunk wrote:You just described the opposite of an "assault weapon", which BTW is a term made up by the media.King Deez wrote:an AR, AK, etc. Semi automatic with magazines that carry large capacity is what I consider an assault weapon. Pistols are not assault weapons. A deer rifle bolt action or even 5 round semi automatic rifle is not an assault weapon.Johnnyblazzed wrote:
The media definition is far different than the actual definition. I believe Max is merely asking what you consider an assault weapon.
- Kingcarl24
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 42560
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:48 am
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
I used to screen applications for positions. One of the questions we asked on every job is if the person has ever been convicted of any crime. Normally I would see one or 2 yes for every 5-10 jobs. The most "yes's" I ever saw was for a police officer position. I never understood that. Almost 20% of the applicants for the police officer position had previous criminal convictions.
- Robceltsfan
- Pick 'Em League Champion
- Posts: 52829
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
- Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Re: Cops Tested vs Tests for Assault weapons
I think part of that reason is because the applicant knows without a shadow of a doubt that a background check is going to be done. Many others lie about it in other jobs.Kingcarl24 wrote:I used to screen applications for positions. One of the questions we asked on every job is if the person has ever been convicted of any crime. Normally I would see one or 2 yes for every 5-10 jobs. The most "yes's" I ever saw was for a police officer position. I never understood that. Almost 20% of the applicants for the police officer position had previous criminal convictions.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
~George Carlin~
~George Carlin~