That's like if someone posted a thread discussing Larry Bird's efficiency and someone came in and said "Yeah he was good but he was never as good of a defender as Lebron, Jordan or Pippen. Some people just need to accept that."
It holds no relevancy, derails the thread and makes the user posting it look like a buffoon.
I can add to a thread whatever I want to add long as it is relevant. What i said was very relevant to the subject.
I'm not here to join a circle-jerk of no one. Sorry if that ruffles your feathers.
vcsgrizzfan wrote:Tim has always been underrated. Extremely good defender, great passer, boarder, scorer when required and just the epitome of the team guy. Would never sulk and only cares about the 'W'.
What he accomplished in 2003 with a very mediocre supporting cast is as good as it gets and rivals Hakeem in 1994.
Perhaps not quite as high a peak as Shaq, but it's closer than most people think.
There's really no true rating of Duncan by a majority. Some think he's boring, slow and overrated and some think that he's underrated and skills are understated. The majority should be agreeing that he's a great player and possibly top 10 GOAT. For some reason, a consensus is non existent.
