Yeah his 37 ppg was weak in those 80srileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't hack it in the 80's.
lebron vs jordan
Re: lebron vs jordan
Re: lebron vs jordan
rileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't hack it in the 80's.
Lebron would be a 15 ppg player in the rough physical 80s with Hand checking allowed. Jordan was 34-35 ppg plus player
Last edited by DorianRo on Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: lebron vs jordan
Am I too late for the Chicago Bulls circlejerk?
Come at the King, you best not miss.
Re: lebron vs jordan
Neverl3bron wrote:Am I too late for the Chicago Bulls circlejerk?
Re: lebron vs jordan
No but you are welcome to join the lebron idiotsl3bron wrote:Am I too late for the Chicago Bulls circlejerk?
- rileymartin
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31085
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: lebron vs jordan
Jordan couldn't win in the 80's, he had to wait until the weak 90's to finally win.deezna10 wrote:Yeah his 37 ppg was weak in those 80srileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't hack it in the 80's.
Re: lebron vs jordan
Huh? Of course he's not #1 on anyone's list yet. Doesn't change the fact that he's the best to lace em up.Titan18 wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Max wrote:I don't care to argue. It's blatantly obvious to anyone that's not a homer.deezna10 wrote: The majority of the country disagrees with you lol
Would you call americanfidel, Riley, ghostown, undies, fplii and others "homers"?
Be patient.
Re: lebron vs jordan
rileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't win in the 80's, he had to wait until the weak 90's to finally win.deezna10 wrote:Yeah his 37 ppg was weak in those 80srileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't hack it in the 80's.
He didn't have a 66-win team around him like Lebronze did in Cleveland.
- rileymartin
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31085
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: lebron vs jordan
Because he wasn't good enough to beat those 80's teams.dwcmwa wrote:rileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't win in the 80's, he had to wait until the weak 90's to finally win.deezna10 wrote: Yeah his 37 ppg was weak in those 80s
He didn't have a 67 win team around him like Bronze in Cleveland.
Re: lebron vs jordan
I would just think if he's the best now.Max wrote:Huh? Of course he's not #1 on anyone's list yet. Doesn't change the fact that he's the best to lace em up.Titan18 wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Max wrote: I don't care to argue. It's blatantly obvious to anyone that's not a homer.
Would you call americanfidel, Riley, ghostown, undies, fplii and others "homers"?
Be patient.
People's list of the best would reflect that.
He's still young so obviously he still has time to add to
His legacy.
I think what you meant was "Lebron has the potential
To be >Jordan and who doesn't see that is a homer"
Last edited by Titan18 on Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jordanzone
- constitutionnomore
- Posts: 5337
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:44 am
Re: lebron vs jordan
dwcmwa wrote:rileymartin wrote:Jordan couldn't win in the 80's, he had to wait until the weak 90's to finally win.deezna10 wrote: Yeah his 37 ppg was weak in those 80s
He didn't have a 66-win team around him like Lebronze did in Cleveland.
...no doubt MJ seals the deal in Cleveland, just something else that separates them....and he wouldn't have to tell the city he won't stop until he wins a title...
Re: lebron vs jordan
No single player would have. Magic nope.Kareem nope. You get the picturerileymartin wrote:Because he wasn't good enough to beat those 80's teams.dwcmwa wrote:rileymartin wrote:
Jordan couldn't win in the 80's, he had to wait until the weak 90's to finally win.
He didn't have a 67 win team around him like Bronze in Cleveland.