zombiesonics wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 11:39 pm
kobeunderbite wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 5:30 pm
zombiesonics wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:10 pm
This image literally proves my point. The fact that your Jew friends are proudly sharing it on Faceberg just further hammers the point home.
Jews control the media, except when Israel is in the news lol. Amazing point you've made there, black
“The Jews who run the NYT are running cover for Israel, this proves that they are anti-Israel”
- kobeunderbite
Running cover for Israel? You still don't understand? That headline change doesn't represent 'cover' for Israel. After an Islamic Jihadi faction rocket fired from Gaza at Israel accidentally landed in a hospital parking lot *in* Gaza, Hamas reported, within 30 minutes, that Israel had bombed a hospital, killing at least 500. Some organizations were naturally skeptical of the claim and the possibility that 500 bodies could be counted within 30 days, let alone 30 minutes, but most like the New York Times immediately ran with what the Hamas-led Gazan ministry of health was reporting, much to the detriment of Israel in terms of "public relations." The New York Times was 'running cover' for Israel by immediately printing Hamas' claims about supposed atrocities committed by Israel?
Gradually, more and more governments independently investigated and concluded that the rocket wasn't fired by Israel. Even the UN begrudgingly dropped the issue when it became completely clear what had happened. As this story unfolded and Israel was obviously exonerated, the New York Times was forced to change its headlines. But rather than clearly name the culprit and clear Israel, the New York Times instead left the headline vague and open to interpretation, as if the matter was somehow unsettled. So when a dubious claim was voiced by Hamas, a terrorist group, about a war crime that Israel supposedly committed, the New York Times believed it and ran with the story immediately. But when Israel's name was cleared in the matter, it chose not to say so, even calling the Islamic Jihadi rocket a "blast" instead of a "strike." As if a spontaneous blast erupted in the parking lot.
This is to say virtually nothing about the fact that the rocket did no more than damage the hospital parking lot and the people loitering there. There was never any evidence of the hospital building itself being hit by a rocket or damaged at all. I know that your only intention is to say bad things about Jews, but at least try to keep it sensible. The fact that you still don't understand what an Israel-hating entity the New York Times is embarrassing. You're so mixed up by "da jooz!" conspiracies that you can't keep it straight in your own mind. I know that you're pre-programmed to believe that Jews control the media, and grappling with that *and* an anti-Israel media is blowing some circuits in your brain, but at least don't say something as stupid as "The NY Times is running cover for Israel."