I present to you my Mock Draft

[kobeunderbite]

1. Jabari Parker
2. Andrew Wiggins
3. Joel Embiid
4. Dante Exum
5. Noah Vonleh
6. Aaron Gordon
7. Julius Randle
8-30: I'm not concerned with these picks.

[Bush4Ever]

I salute you and all the work you put into this draft.

Good job.

[kobeunderbite]

I salute you and all the work you put into this draft.

Good job.

Thank you

[Kingcarl24]

The 76ers with two injury prone centers?

[kobeunderbite]

The 76ers with two injury prone centers?

I'm thinking there may be a trade of some sort. Realistically, I can't see Philadelphia passing on Embiid with AW/JP off the board, given the talent dropoff there is after those three players.

[LookAway]

Lakers are getting Embiid. It was all a ruse. You'll see

[kobeunderbite]

Lakers are getting Embiid. It was all a ruse. You'll see

The chances of the Celtics passing on Embiid are approximately 0.00%

[AtiliusRegulus]

1. Jabari Parker
2. Andrew Wiggins
3. Joel Embiid
4. Dante Exum
5. Noah Vonleh
6. Aaron Gordon
7. Julius Randle
8-30: I'm not concerned with these picks.

you do know that Embiid is injured? I would swap him with Randle. But if you like risks your mock draft is solid.

[kobeunderbite]

1. Jabari Parker
2. Andrew Wiggins
3. Joel Embiid
4. Dante Exum
5. Noah Vonleh
6. Aaron Gordon
7. Julius Randle
8-30: I'm not concerned with these picks.

you do know that Embiid is injured? I would swap him with Randle. But if you like risks your mock draft is solid.

There is not even a remote chance that Embiid falls as low as #7.

[LookAway]

1. Jabari Parker
2. Andrew Wiggins
3. Joel Embiid
4. Dante Exum
5. Noah Vonleh
6. Aaron Gordon
7. Julius Randle
8-30: I'm not concerned with these picks.

you do know that Embiid is injured? I would swap him with Randle. But if you like risks your mock draft is solid.

There is not even a remote chance that Embiid falls as low as #7.

He will. There is no chance the Lakers don't get him. My source is Adam and he is very tall

[Kingcarl24]

you do know that Embiid is injured? I would swap him with Randle. But if you like risks your mock draft is solid.

There is not even a remote chance that Embiid falls as low as #7.

He will. There is no chance the Lakers don't get him. My source is Adam and he is very tall

He's also bald which according to Bush makes him very smart.

[wailuaFC]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

[kobeunderbite]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

Yes, I've always preferred Randle, though I wouldn't be unhappy with Smart. Prefer bigs with plus skills to guards with poor skills. Smart's shooting is embarrassing.

[wailuaFC]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

Yes, I've always preferred Randle, though I wouldn't be unhappy with Smart. Prefer bigs with plus skills to guards with poor skills. Smart's shooting is embarrassing.

Players can get better at shooting, at least smart could make an immediate impact defensively, who knows how randle's banging down low will work when playing against bigger, stronger, longer players

[l3bron]

lol at Randle's "skill." Dude has been playing bully ball since high school.

Can't shoot, can't post up, can't defend, can't block shots and on top of all that he's undersized. Them "skills" though.

[kobeunderbite]

lol at Randle's "skill." Dude has been playing bully ball since high school.

Can't shoot, can't post up, can't defend, can't block shots and on top of all that he's undersized. Them "skills" though.

lol. He can shoot, he can put the ball on the floor/finish, he is an elite offensive rebounder (rebounding is a skill, last I checked), and 6'9.5 for a PF is hardly undersized in today's NBA.

[kobeunderbite]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

Yes, I've always preferred Randle, though I wouldn't be unhappy with Smart. Prefer bigs with plus skills to guards with poor skills. Smart's shooting is embarrassing.

Players can get better at shooting, at least smart could make an immediate impact defensively, who knows how randle's banging down low will work when playing against bigger, stronger, longer players

Lakers aren't in win-now mode, but with that being said, I'm not convinced that Smart would make a better immediate impact that Randle.

[LookAway]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

Yes, I've always preferred Randle, though I wouldn't be unhappy with Smart. Prefer bigs with plus skills to guards with poor skills. Smart's shooting is embarrassing.

How do you feel about Gordon?

[Kingcarl24]

Underbite, you leaning towards randle over smart? Personally I think smart has more tools to be a bigger contributor thrn randle, his elite size/defense is much more enticing to me then anything randle has to offer

Yes, I've always preferred Randle, though I wouldn't be unhappy with Smart. Prefer bigs with plus skills to guards with poor skills. Smart's shooting is embarrassing.

How do you feel about Gordon?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Shill Jackson]

lol @ any team taking Embiid