If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Post by **ripper76** » Sun Feb 05, 2023 9:48 pm

The AI (or more like the people who program the AI) say no. It's never acceptable to use hate speech.

:yaoyao:

Bush4Ever. · Post by **Bush4Ever.** » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:40 pm

I tried a very slight deviation of the above question to ChatGPT and got this (I specified first it was an Anti-Black slur, then an Anti-White slur in the next version of the question):

Anti-Black Slur:

As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide a few ethical and philosophical perspectives on the matter.

Utilitarianism, for example, would argue that speaking the racial slur in order to save several million lives would be the morally right choice, as it would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

Deontological ethics, on the other hand, might argue that the act of speaking the racial slur would be inherently wrong, regardless of the consequences, because it would involve using language that is demeaning and offensive to a certain group of people.

Ultimately, the answer to this hypothetical scenario is a complex and difficult question with no easy answer, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. It is a question that may elicit strong emotions and differing opinions from individuals and communities.

Anti-White Slur:

As in the previous scenario, the answer to this question is complex and difficult, as it requires weighing the value of human lives against the harm caused by the use of hate speech. Regardless of the racial group being demeaned, the use of a racial slur or any other type of hate speech is not acceptable, as it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and prejudices and has the potential to cause harm and offense to individuals and communities.

In this hypothetical scenario, the moral dilemma is whether to prioritize the preservation of life or to uphold the principles against hate speech. This can be seen as a classic ethical dilemma, as both options have compelling arguments.

Ultimately, the decision would likely depend on personal values, beliefs, and principles. Some may argue that it is justifiable to speak the racial slur in order to save several million lives, while others may argue that using hate speech is never acceptable, regardless of the consequences.

Bush4Ever. · Post by **Bush4Ever.** » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:42 pm

It's almost like ChatGPT is a hyper-intelligence of Abe on these questions.

CleveTown™ · Post by **CleveTown™** » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:53 pm

i hate when the answer starts out with "As an AI language model"...

I immediately roll my eyes.

Alex_Murphy · Post by **Alex_Murphy** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:41 am

ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.

wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?

CleveTown™ · Post by **CleveTown™** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:49 am

Alex_Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:41 am ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.

wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?

are you retarded? anyone can use it. google it

Alex_Murphy · Post by **Alex_Murphy** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:48 am

CleveTown™ wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:49 am
Alex_Murphy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:41 am ITT i learned that Bush may also have a time machine that hes not telling us about.

wtf is ChatGPT. do you have your own personal AI?
are you retarded? anyone can use it. google it

wut.

Post by **ripper76** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 3:34 am

Post by **ripper76** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:22 am

They had to “fix” how they code and let AIs learn in order to avoid a repeat of what happened with Tay.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-expe ... ist-2016-3

After that they basically lobotomized her and all other “AI.”

RIP in peace Tay!

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am

I'm not into the same stuff you all are into

kobeunderbite · Post by **kobeunderbite** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:17 am

elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am I'm not into the same stuff you all are into

No, you're into stuffing your face, smelly feet, doing drugs and watching porn. Most people here are definitely into different "stuff."

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:24 am

kobeunderbite wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:17 am
elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am I'm not into the same stuff you all are into

No, you're into stuffing your face, smelly feet, doing drugs and watching porn. Most people here are definitely into different "stuff."

I'm not into any of that actually but thanks for making it even more clear how clueless you are about me in every possible way imaginable

Post by **ripper76** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:54 pm

elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am I'm not into the same stuff you all are into

We know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:35 pm

ripper76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:54 pm
elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am I'm not into the same stuff you all are into
We know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.

Not a single fact in your post faggot

Alex_Murphy · Post by **Alex_Murphy** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:37 pm

elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:35 pm
ripper76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:54 pm
elartman1973 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:32 am I'm not into the same stuff you all are into
We know. Shooting up, smoking weed non-stop, being 50 years old without a wife or children, collecting unemployment, spending all day watching old 80s sitcoms, and defending President Brandon against any criticism are not things anyone else here is really into.
Not a single fact in your post faggot

He's actually pretty spot-on

AngerGeneral

If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?

Re: If the only way to disarm a nuclear bomb that will kill millions is to use "hate speech", would you do it?