Hi Artman, here is your daily trigger

[elartman1973]

So if Johnny contributed ten cents to the total cost of the grub, he should get a vote equal to the guy who ponied up a twenty?

You can't even stay consistent within your own policy, ya big dummy.

Yes.

Autism

You think people who dont pay income taxes should be allowed to vote. Makes sense...you voted for one of them in 2016

[kobeunderbite]

It's amazing that artman is too fat to understand why his proposal is racist.


Personally I believe that only landowner's should be allowed to vote, which means that only artman's mother would get a vote and not artman himself.

[Bush4Ever.]

Person A: Pays 13 dollars to the pizza
Person B: Pays 4 dollars to the pizza
Person C: Pays 2.99 dollars to the pizza
Person D: Pays: 0.01 dollars to the pizza

According to Artman, all parties should receive an equal vote on the toppings, because they all contributed.

Person A gets a 25 percent vote despite paying 65 percent of the money.
Person D gets a 25 percent vote despite not even paying a tenth of a percentage of the money.

#artmanpoliticaltheory

[TheSaboteur]

It's amazing that artman is too fat to understand why his proposal is racist.


Personally I believe that only landowner's should be allowed to vote, which means that only artman's mother would get a vote and not artman himself.

What about someone who owns (own's) a condo? Does that count?

[kobeunderbite]

It's amazing that artman is too fat to understand why his proposal is racist.


Personally I believe that only landowner's should be allowed to vote, which means that only artman's mother would get a vote and not artman himself.

What about someone who owns (own's) a condo? Does that count?

Why do you have to do the parentheses thing? I'm on my phone.

[TheSaboteur]

It's amazing that artman is too fat to understand why his proposal is racist.


Personally I believe that only landowner's should be allowed to vote, which means that only artman's mother would get a vote and not artman himself.

What about someone who owns (own's) a condo? Does that count?

Why do you have to do the parentheses thing? I'm on my phone.

It's one of the more embarrassing mistakes you can make though, phone or not.

[americaninfidel]

Talking more gibberish that has nothing to do with me at all..that's how I know you've been slaughtered.

It's very simple so patty close attention.

If you pay taxes you have a right to vote. Period.
Nothing else is relevant.
Every person has a right to vote on how they will be governed and their tax money spent.. Society is the mass of ALL THE PEOPLE, not just some.
That's the problem with you losers. You dont believe in democracy...you claim you do but you really dont. And that's why you people need to go and why trump had to go. You dont believe in america or what it stands for. You are better suited to live in Russia actually. They are really what you would feel more comfortable with

Are you suggesting that only those who have a tax burden should have voting rights?

No. It's only one of the requirements but it is an important one.
But you are claiming you have to be married to vote..
You're the absurd one here.

If a bunch of guys get together to watch a football game and everyone chips in for pizza except for Johnny. You think Johnny has the same right to pick what kind of pizza is ordered?

Where did I claim that, dummy?

[americaninfidel]

Person A: Pays 13 dollars to the pizza
Person B: Pays 4 dollars to the pizza
Person C: Pays 2.99 dollars to the pizza
Person D: Pays: 0.01 dollars to the pizza

According to Artman, all parties should receive an equal vote on the toppings, because they all contributed.

Person A gets a 25 percent vote despite paying 65 percent of the money.
Person D gets a 25 percent vote despite not even paying a tenth of a percentage of the money.

#artmanpoliticaltheory

*Like

Artman is really dumb.

[Sudanese Sensation]

These threads are always pretty hilarious. Atilius shares a stupid picture created by a Russian troll farm, and the rest of you suck each other off (some trolling, some serious) with posts about what it means to be a real man/person or something. The man in the sculpture is Silenus, who is more like Artman than anyone here: minor god of drunkenness and wine making, "related to musical creativity, prophetic ecstasy, drunken joy, drunken dances and gestures", and is often portrayed as fat. He's the foster father of the child in the sculpture, Dionysus, who is one of Zeus's sons, so he is also the ultimate cuck according to Bush4Ever.

Arty strenuously denies being fat. If arty was to hold himself out as a mythical Greek hero it would likely be Heracles.

[Uncontroversial]

These threads are always pretty hilarious. Atilius shares a stupid picture created by a Russian troll farm, and the rest of you suck each other off (some trolling, some serious) with posts about what it means to be a real man/person or something. The man in the sculpture is Silenus, who is more like Artman than anyone here: minor god of drunkenness and wine making, "related to musical creativity, prophetic ecstasy, drunken joy, drunken dances and gestures", and is often portrayed as fat. He's the foster father of the child in the sculpture, Dionysus, who is one of Zeus's sons, so he is also the ultimate cuck according to Bush4Ever.

[elartman1973]

Person A: Pays 13 dollars to the pizza
Person B: Pays 4 dollars to the pizza
Person C: Pays 2.99 dollars to the pizza
Person D: Pays: 0.01 dollars to the pizza

According to Artman, all parties should receive an equal vote on the toppings, because they all contributed.

Person A gets a 25 percent vote despite paying 65 percent of the money.
Person D gets a 25 percent vote despite not even paying a tenth of a percentage of the money.

#artmanpoliticaltheory

How is voting now?
Every vote counts the same. You dont get more votes if you have more money. So how am I wrong?
Moron

Paying income tax is only one of the requirements to vote. Not the only one.
Moron

[elartman1973]

Are you suggesting that only those who have a tax burden should have voting rights?

No. It's only one of the requirements but it is an important one.
But you are claiming you have to be married to vote..
You're the absurd one here.

If a bunch of guys get together to watch a football game and everyone chips in for pizza except for Johnny. You think Johnny has the same right to pick what kind of pizza is ordered?

Where did I claim that, dummy?

You didnt have to..its the argument you support by trying to attack what I've been saying.

[elartman1973]

It's amazing that artman is too fat to understand why his proposal is racist.


Personally I believe that only landowner's should be allowed to vote, which means that only artman's mother would get a vote and not artman himself.

Fail. I own property and am about to acquire more. So I would get more than one vote based on your severely racist proposal....faggot.
You're so stupid you think my proposal is racist while yours that's ten times more racist is fine...damn..jews are stupid..that's why they should and do stay out of politics

[elartman1973]

Person A: Pays 13 dollars to the pizza
Person B: Pays 4 dollars to the pizza
Person C: Pays 2.99 dollars to the pizza
Person D: Pays: 0.01 dollars to the pizza

According to Artman, all parties should receive an equal vote on the toppings, because they all contributed.

Person A gets a 25 percent vote despite paying 65 percent of the money.
Person D gets a 25 percent vote despite not even paying a tenth of a percentage of the money.

#artmanpoliticaltheory

*Like

Artman is really dumb.

I'm thoroughly convinced I'm the smartest one here...take a look at your peoples replies...holy shit you guys are dumb as fuck. Nothing I've said is out of the ordinary or wrong.
Paying income tax is only one requirement not the only one..morons

[Bush4Ever.]

How is voting now?
Every vote counts the same.

You dont get more votes if you have more money. So how am I wrong?
Moron

Paying income tax is only one of the requirements to vote. Not the only one.
Moron

The person who pays a minimal amount of money in income tax is closer in total contribution to the person who pays nothing than he is to the person who pays six or seven figures worth of income tax.

You are very stupid and fat.

Spoiler:

Tits

[Sudanese Sensation]

These threads are always pretty hilarious. Atilius shares a stupid picture created by a Russian troll farm, and the rest of you suck each other off (some trolling, some serious) with posts about what it means to be a real man/person or something. The man in the sculpture is Silenus, who is more like Artman than anyone here: minor god of drunkenness and wine making, "related to musical creativity, prophetic ecstasy, drunken joy, drunken dances and gestures", and is often portrayed as fat. He's the foster father of the child in the sculpture, Dionysus, who is one of Zeus's sons, so he is also the ultimate cuck according to Bush4Ever.

I would donate fifty dollars to the charity of his choice if he did a drunken dance on Tik Tok.

[elartman1973]

How is voting now?
Every vote counts the same.

You dont get more votes if you have more money. So how am I wrong?
Moron

Paying income tax is only one of the requirements to vote. Not the only one.
Moron

The person who pays a minimal amount of money in income tax is closer in total contribution to the person who pays nothing than he is to the person who pays six or seven figures worth of income tax.

You are very stupid and fat.

Spoiler:

Tits

Its irrelevent you idiot. Does anybody get more than one vote now?
No.
So why would they based on how much they pay in taxes?
It's one requirement you jackass. Not the only one and not important what amount is paid. How stupid as fuck are you?
Even now everyone only gets 1 vote. No matter how much land a person owns..so what the fuck are you even talking about?
Stop trying so desperately to be funny or insult me when you know damn well you have no ammo here. Grow uo

[Bush4Ever.]

Its irrelevent you idiot. Does anybody get more than one vote now?
No.
So why would they based on how much they pay in taxes?

It's a logical extension of your position.

You say "Black and Brown people who don't pay income tax are forbidden from voting, but a White person who pays a dollar in income taxes can freely vote" because "they have a right to vote how their money is spent".

Your position is internally inconsistent because the people who pay tons in taxes have significantly less of an ability to vote on their contribution than a person who pays minimal, non-zero values.

Their share of the vote is vastly outstripped by their tax burden, whereas for people like you who pay very little in income tax, the opposite is true...you have a higher percentage of the vote than you do percentage of the tax burden.

If you were internally consistent with your racist proposal, there would be a perfect correlation between tax burden and percentage of vote.

Would you support a person who doesn't usually pay income tax being allowed a vote if they contributed a penny to the public coffers?

[Sudanese Sensation]

These threads are always pretty hilarious. Atilius shares a stupid picture created by a Russian troll farm, and the rest of you suck each other off (some trolling, some serious) with posts about what it means to be a real man/person or something. The man in the sculpture is Silenus, who is more like Artman than anyone here: minor god of drunkenness and wine making, "related to musical creativity, prophetic ecstasy, drunken joy, drunken dances and gestures", and is often portrayed as fat. He's the foster father of the child in the sculpture, Dionysus, who is one of Zeus's sons, so he is also the ultimate cuck according to Bush4Ever.

Kind of like Chris Farley.

[Sudanese Sensation]

Its irrelevent you idiot. Does anybody get more than one vote now?
No.
So why would they based on how much they pay in taxes?

It's a logical extension of your position.

You say "Black and Brown people who don't pay income tax are forbidden from voting, but a White person who pays a dollar in income taxes can freely vote" because "they have a right to vote how their money is spent".

Your position is internally inconsistent because the people who pay tons in taxes have significantly less of an ability to vote on their contribution than a person who pays minimal, non-zero values.

Their share of the vote is vastly outstripped by their tax burden, whereas for people like you who pay very little in income tax, the opposite is true...you have a higher percentage of the vote than you do percentage of the tax burden.

If you were internally consistent with your racist proposal, there would be a perfect correlation between tax burden and percentage of vote.

Would you support a person who doesn't usually pay income tax being allowed a vote if they contributed a penny to the public coffers?

If arty could dance drunkenly like Silenus who has been referenced in this thread would you have more or less respect for his opinion?