kobeunderbite wrote:Correct, does NOT have the titles. That is absolutely correct.
But little guy, without cheating, where do you think Serena ranks on the list of most women's titles? Don't check the answer if you have a full bladder.
Sam Snead has the most golf tournament victories. Nobody really gives a shit.
I only go by what my eyes tell me. I thought Graf was great and really enjoyed watching her play. But my eyes tell me that Serena would mollywhop her 8.5 out of 10 matches, even adjusting for technology, training etc.
I also think the depth of fields in the women's game dwarfs what was the case when Steffi was dominating. As far as Margaret Court is concerned, I am sad to admit that I watched many of her matches live. Even adjusting for era, she wouldn't be a top twenty player nowadays.
kobeunderbite wrote:Correct, does NOT have the titles. That is absolutely correct.
But little guy, without cheating, where do you think Serena ranks on the list of most women's titles? Don't check the answer if you have a full bladder.
I don’t need to look, I’ve been following tennis longer that you.
If you want to talk overall, then state it.
"Educated people make the world a better place, they mercilessly attack misery and cruelty, and eventually they win."
--Henry Rollins
kobeunderbite wrote:Correct, does NOT have the titles. That is absolutely correct.
But little guy, without cheating, where do you think Serena ranks on the list of most women's titles? Don't check the answer if you have a full bladder.
Sam Snead has the most golf tournament victories. Nobody really gives a shit.
I only go by what my eyes tell me. I thought Graf was great and really enjoyed watching her play. But my eyes tell me that Serena would mollywhop her 8.5 out of 10 matches, even adjusting for technology, training etc.
I also think the depth of fields in the women's game dwarfs what was the case when Steffi was dominating. As far as Margaret Court is concerned, I am sad to admit that I watched many of her matches live. Even adjusting for era, she wouldn't be a top twenty player nowadays.
Sam Snead is one man, Serena has seven or eight to leapfrog on her way to most titles, including more than a couple from the Open Era. You just sound like Adam Ottavino with his Babe Ruth clickbait take.
We'll have to agree to disagree here but I find the take that Steffi faced weaker competition to be laughable. Serena's longevity is admirable but she owes much of the successes of the second half of her career to a laughably weak tour. Basically a generation that wasn't.
kobeunderbite wrote:Correct, does NOT have the titles. That is absolutely correct.
But little guy, without cheating, where do you think Serena ranks on the list of most women's titles? Don't check the answer if you have a full bladder.
Sam Snead has the most golf tournament victories. Nobody really gives a shit.
I only go by what my eyes tell me. I thought Graf was great and really enjoyed watching her play. But my eyes tell me that Serena would mollywhop her 8.5 out of 10 matches, even adjusting for technology, training etc.
I also think the depth of fields in the women's game dwarfs what was the case when Steffi was dominating. As far as Margaret Court is concerned, I am sad to admit that I watched many of her matches live. Even adjusting for era, she wouldn't be a top twenty player nowadays.
Sam Snead is one man, Serena has seven or eight to leapfrog on her way to most titles, including more than a couple from the Open Era. You just sound like Adam Ottavino with his Babe Ruth clickbait take.
We'll have to agree to disagree here but I find the take that Steffi faced weaker competition to be laughable. Serena's longevity is admirable but she owes much of the successes of the second half of her career to a laughably weak tour. Basically a generation that wasn't.
kobeunderbite wrote:Correct, does NOT have the titles. That is absolutely correct.
But little guy, without cheating, where do you think Serena ranks on the list of most women's titles? Don't check the answer if you have a full bladder.
I don’t need to look, I’ve been following tennis longer that you.
If you want to talk overall, then state it.
I know you're not the brightest bulb, but when I said "Serena doesn't have the slams, doesn't have the weeks, doesn't have the titles" - did you think that slams and titles were meant to mean the same thing? Why would I re-state the same category under a different name? Again I know you're not the brightest, but that's pretty dumb - even for you. Next time engage the part of your brain that handles critical thinking!
