LeBron homers owned
- rileymartin
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31088
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Serious question...Who is the bigger Oaf?
Arty, who plays the dumb guy for attention, or Deez who really is a dumb guy?...
Arty, who plays the dumb guy for attention, or Deez who really is a dumb guy?...
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
I presented facts on the matchups and why it's disadvantageous to the Bulls on both ends of the floor. You know I'm right because you refuse to address it. So yes, you should leave. You're welcome.Deez wrote:I won’t thank you considering how many people agree with me on this. You can claim you are right all you want. It’s your opinion.vcsgrizzfan wrote:You really should leave Deez. You'll thank me later if you ever reread this thread.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155084
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: LeBron homers owned
Keep deflecting with nonsenseLeBronMonsterDunk wrote:Yea we noticed.elartman1973 wrote: My regular and.NBA IQ are vastly superior to yours...time to accept reality dumbfuck
Havlicekstealsit wrote:Warriors have passed that mark twice the last 4 years.elartman1973 wrote: 1995 magic had the best offense of all time at a 115.5 rating
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14695
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
I basically stopped picking on Deez for the last few years. There's just no sport in it. I've regressed some today and yesterday, but I'll try to avoid it in the future.rileymartin wrote:Serious question...Who is the bigger Oaf?
Arty, who plays the dumb guy for attention, or Deez who really is a dumb guy?...
Arty is such an asshole that I don't mind yanking him by the chain a little, but it does get boring after a while too.
- americaninfidel
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 13968
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Re: LeBron homers owned
Maybe Pippen could check him. Maybe Bowen could give him trouble. And maybe maybe Coop could disrupt him a bit.Bush4Ever. wrote:Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
Fear is the mind killer. We are not afraid.
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155084
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: LeBron homers owned
Durant would get injured vs the bulls so who cares who would guard his weak ads?
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- rileymartin
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31088
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
There has never really been any sport in polarizing either...I hit Arty from time to time, but not like everyone else, because he enjoys it for some reason...He is the dude that would pay a prostitute to stomp on his nuts...vcsgrizzfan wrote:I basically stopped picking on Deez for the last few years. There's just no sport in it. I've regressed some today and yesterday, but I'll try to avoid it in the future.rileymartin wrote:Serious question...Who is the bigger Oaf?
Arty, who plays the dumb guy for attention, or Deez who really is a dumb guy?...
Arty is such an asshole that I don't mind yanking him by the chain a little, but it does get boring after a while too.
Deez on the other hand wants so badly to believe that he has even the merest inkling of intelligence, and exposing him for the buffoon he is has always been fun for me, probably too fun...
- Da Stars.
- Tight wad. Penny pincher. Mr. Dollar Theater.
- Posts: 36199
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:51 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
What do I know, but I do think the 92 Bulls team was a better team.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
Da Stars. wrote:What do I know, but I do think the 92 Bulls team was a better team.
I think it would be a better matchup against the modern day Warriors than the 1996 version for sure. Fewer guys to hide defensively and Grant could give you a lot more offensively than Rodman while still defending really well. The Centers are less of a collection of big oafs.
Re: LeBron homers owned
No but slow him down some, yes. Gotta remember Jordan more than offsets Durant on both ends of the floor. Pippen will do well, Rodman stops green. Harper and Jordan contain Thompson and Curry, as in it will be tough for them. We act like the bulls are gonna play them on D and just let them fire threes.Bush4Ever. wrote:Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14695
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Jordan *actually* shot less than 42 percent (true shooting percentage 54 percent) in the 1996 NBA Finals.Deez wrote:
No but slow him down some, yes. Gotta remember Jordan more than offsets Durant on both ends of the floor.
Durant *actually* shot 70 percent true shooting percentage in the 2017 Finals.
- lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 58370
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
americaninfidel wrote:Maybe Pippen could check him. Maybe Bowen could give him trouble. And maybe maybe Coop could disrupt him a bit.Bush4Ever. wrote:Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
Durant is the player I’d create for myself on a video game. Bowen is only gonna “trouble” him if he gets away with his usual dirty tactics.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
The only material advantage is MJ over Klay. Every other matchup favors the Warriors, including a bench that can actually play meaningful minutes without getting exposed. The Bulls have two guys you have to pay attention to offensively, not counting Kukoc off the bench - sort of, who is inferior to Iggy.Deez wrote:No but slow him down some, yes. Gotta remember Jordan more than offsets Durant on both ends of the floor. Pippen will do well, Rodman stops green. Harper and Jordan contain Thompson and Curry, as in it will be tough for them. We act like the bulls are gonna play them on D and just let them fire threes.Bush4Ever. wrote:Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.Deez wrote:Durant is god, crown him now. Nobody could guard him with any set of rules.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
And the thing that you just can't seem to grasp is the huge disparity in the number of 3s each team is capable of making. The Bulls were simply not designed to defend 30 feet from the bucket. They had 2 guys who could do it really well in Pippen and MJ, one guy who could do in reasonably well in Harper and an aging Rodman who could do it in little spurts. That isn't going to cut it. They were built to succeed against teams far different from the modern Warriors.
Re: LeBron homers owned
Jordan, Rodman, Pippen as a big 3 best the Warriors big three. Rodman > Green in that matchup. Green would get tossed 10 mins in. Rodman on D is better and a far superior rebounder. Green can shoot better, he has that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:The only material advantage is MJ over Klay. Every other matchup favors the Warriors, including a bench that can actually play meaningful minutes without getting exposed. The Bulls have two guys you have to pay attention to offensively, not counting Kukoc off the bench - sort of, who is inferior to Iggy.Deez wrote:No but slow him down some, yes. Gotta remember Jordan more than offsets Durant on both ends of the floor. Pippen will do well, Rodman stops green. Harper and Jordan contain Thompson and Curry, as in it will be tough for them. We act like the bulls are gonna play them on D and just let them fire threes.Bush4Ever. wrote:
Pretty much no one in NBA history is going to meaningfully stop Durant in single coverage.
Yes, that's pretty much correct.
And the thing that you just can't seem to grasp is the huge disparity in the number of 3s each team is capable of making. The Bulls were simply not designed to defend 30 feet from the bucket. They had 2 guys who could do it really well in Pippen and MJ, one guy who could do in reasonably well in Harper and an aging Rodman who could do it in little spurts. That isn't going to cut it. They were built to succeed against teams far different from the modern Warriors.
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14695
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Why did Rodman let Kemp go off for 23 and 10 on 55 percent shooting (or thereabouts) in the 1996 Finals if he had this magical ability to just neutralize players with his mind whenever he felt like it?Deez wrote:
Rodman > Green in that matchup. Green would get tossed 10 mins in.
- rileymartin
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31088
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Larry Bird used to buttfuck Rodman up and down the court with ease...
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
Stop it! Rodman isn't better than Green in the modern game. His one dimensional game worked in the 90s and especially with the Bulls who didn't need much from him offensively, but Green has versatility that Rodman doesn't have. And why did you pick 3 and why did you pick Green over Klay for the 3rd?Deez wrote:Jordan, Rodman, Pippen as a big 3 best the Warriors big three. Rodman > Green in that matchup. Green would get tossed 10 mins in. Rodman on D is better and a far superior rebounder. Green can shoot better, he has that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:The only material advantage is MJ over Klay. Every other matchup favors the Warriors, including a bench that can actually play meaningful minutes without getting exposed. The Bulls have two guys you have to pay attention to offensively, not counting Kukoc off the bench - sort of, who is inferior to Iggy.Deez wrote: No but slow him down some, yes. Gotta remember Jordan more than offsets Durant on both ends of the floor. Pippen will do well, Rodman stops green. Harper and Jordan contain Thompson and Curry, as in it will be tough for them. We act like the bulls are gonna play them on D and just let them fire threes.
And the thing that you just can't seem to grasp is the huge disparity in the number of 3s each team is capable of making. The Bulls were simply not designed to defend 30 feet from the bucket. They had 2 guys who could do it really well in Pippen and MJ, one guy who could do in reasonably well in Harper and an aging Rodman who could do it in little spurts. That isn't going to cut it. They were built to succeed against teams far different from the modern Warriors.
Make it 4 guys on the Warriors in Steph, Klay, Durant and Green. All can handle the ball and put it on the deck. All can hit the 3. All can pass really well. All can defend (don't give me bullshit that KD can't defend). It's not a fair fight Deez.
You're almost like Artie ITT. You're emotionally attached to a team and won't see reality for what it is. Whether Orlando suffers in this recession or not has nothing to do with Artie as a person, but he acts like it does. Whether the Bulls could compete with the Warriors has nothing to do with you as a person, but you have made it that way. Take a deep breath Deez. It's not that important.
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155084
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: LeBron homers owned
You act as if the bulls wouldn't have adapted to the times and shoot and practice shooting more threes And built the roster accordingly...and that Phil wouldn't adjust the defense or offense at all...what kind of ignorance do you possess?vcsgrizzfan wrote:Stop it! Rodman isn't better than Green in the modern game. His one dimensional game worked in the 90s and especially with the Bulls who didn't need much from him offensively, but Green has versatility that Rodman doesn't have. And why did you pick 3 and why did you pick Green over Klay for the 3rd?Deez wrote:Jordan, Rodman, Pippen as a big 3 best the Warriors big three. Rodman > Green in that matchup. Green would get tossed 10 mins in. Rodman on D is better and a far superior rebounder. Green can shoot better, he has that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:
The only material advantage is MJ over Klay. Every other matchup favors the Warriors, including a bench that can actually play meaningful minutes without getting exposed. The Bulls have two guys you have to pay attention to offensively, not counting Kukoc off the bench - sort of, who is inferior to Iggy.
And the thing that you just can't seem to grasp is the huge disparity in the number of 3s each team is capable of making. The Bulls were simply not designed to defend 30 feet from the bucket. They had 2 guys who could do it really well in Pippen and MJ, one guy who could do in reasonably well in Harper and an aging Rodman who could do it in little spurts. That isn't going to cut it. They were built to succeed against teams far different from the modern Warriors.
Make it 4 guys on the Warriors in Steph, Klay, Durant and Green. All can handle the ball and put it on the deck. All can hit the 3. All can pass really well. All can defend (don't give me bullshit that KD can't defend). It's not a fair fight Deez.
You're almost like Artie ITT. You're emotionally attached to a team and won't see reality for what it is. Whether Orlando suffers in this recession or not has nothing to do with Artie as a person, but he acts like it does. Whether the Bulls could compete with the Warriors has nothing to do with you as a person, but you have made it that way. Take a deep breath Deez. It's not that important.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
Re: LeBron homers owned
Why did, why did, why did.... Why did the Warriors let a shot Cavs team beat them? You honestly gonna argue for Green over Rodman?Bush4Ever. wrote:Why did Rodman let Kemp go off for 23 and 10 on 55 percent shooting (or thereabouts) in the 1996 Finals if he had this magical ability to just neutralize players with his mind whenever he felt like it?Deez wrote:
Rodman > Green in that matchup. Green would get tossed 10 mins in.