phpBB [video]
LeBron homers owned
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155049
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
- CleveTown™
- Three-Time Fantasy Champion King
- Posts: 71006
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:31 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
Jordan reminds me of Sportswise. So easily triggered and trollable.
And what did he raise his eyebrows up for when GOAT mentioned he beat the greatest team of all time?
He did.
And had the Warriors played in MJ's era they would have run the season. 82-0.
And what did he raise his eyebrows up for when GOAT mentioned he beat the greatest team of all time?
He did.
And had the Warriors played in MJ's era they would have run the season. 82-0.
October 16th, 2020. Thank you Pastor John (P)
January 7th. (D)
January 7th. (D)
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
Re: LeBron homers owned
Bulls beat that team in 7Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
- CleveTown™
- Three-Time Fantasy Champion King
- Posts: 71006
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:31 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
What? When?Deez wrote:Bulls beat that team in 7Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
October 16th, 2020. Thank you Pastor John (P)
January 7th. (D)
January 7th. (D)
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
I thought we were sticking to reality, but simulations taking place inside your head are okay too I guess.Deez wrote:
Bulls beat that team in 7
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
No offense to the Bulls because it's not a fair fight with rule changes and how the game has progressed, but they don't win a game. They might not even get close in a game. That's true of any team from that era because they simply don't have the makeup to compete in league dominated by 3 point shooting and floor spreading. It doesn't take away from their greatness at the time (although that is exaggerated too), but no team from then could compete. Teams then just weren't built to compete the way the game is played today.Deez wrote:Bulls beat that team in 7Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55555
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
vcsgrizzfan wrote:No offense to the Bulls because it's not a fair fight with rule changes and how the game has progressed, but they don't win a game. They might not even get close in a game. That's true of any team from that era because they simply don't have the makeup to compete in league dominated by 3 point shooting and floor spreading. It doesn't take away from their greatness at the time (although that is exaggerated too), but no team from then could compete. Teams then just weren't built to compete the way the game is played today.Deez wrote:Bulls beat that team in 7Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
Re: LeBron homers owned
This is all silly talk, Depends on the rules yes but Jordan and the bulls more than win a game. Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant. Green whom is important imo would be struggling GB to stay on the floor with Rodman on him. Harper was solid on D as well and could slow Curry down or maybe Thompson and Jordan would also hold his own on D. Who is guarding MJ?vcsgrizzfan wrote:No offense to the Bulls because it's not a fair fight with rule changes and how the game has progressed, but they don't win a game. They might not even get close in a game. That's true of any team from that era because they simply don't have the makeup to compete in league dominated by 3 point shooting and floor spreading. It doesn't take away from their greatness at the time (although that is exaggerated too), but no team from then could compete. Teams then just weren't built to compete the way the game is played today.Deez wrote:Bulls beat that team in 7Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.
No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.
Not even close.
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55555
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
Ppl would be surprised how overrated GSW was if they faced prime MJ and the bulls. The team LeBron beat didn't even have Durant.Deez wrote:This is all silly talk, Depends on the rules yes but Jordan and the bulls more than win a game. Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant. Green whom is important imo would be struggling GB to stay on the floor with Rodman on him. Harper was solid on D as well and could slow Curry down or maybe Thompson and Jordan would also hold his own on D. Who is guarding MJ?vcsgrizzfan wrote:No offense to the Bulls because it's not a fair fight with rule changes and how the game has progressed, but they don't win a game. They might not even get close in a game. That's true of any team from that era because they simply don't have the makeup to compete in league dominated by 3 point shooting and floor spreading. It doesn't take away from their greatness at the time (although that is exaggerated too), but no team from then could compete. Teams then just weren't built to compete the way the game is played today.Deez wrote: Bulls beat that team in 7
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.Deez wrote:
Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant.
He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
- Alex_Murphy
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55555
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 12:04 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
Bush4Ever. wrote:Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.Deez wrote:
Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant.
He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
LOL
- Bush4Ever.
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 14669
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Not sure why you are LOLing.UNC MJ FAN. wrote:
LOL
Penny destroyed Pippen at or near his peak.
Pre-Prime Kobe got his against Pippen H2H (albeit post-prime Pippen).
Durant would be the best scorer Pippen has ever gone up against H2H, and cannot be reliably stopped or slowed down within single coverage.
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
How often did Pippen have to defend a guy with a 7'5" wingspan hoisting up threes?
- lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 58349
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: LeBron homers owned
Havlicekstealsit wrote:How often did Pippen have to defend a guy with a 7'5" wingspan hoisting up threes?
Clifford Robinson maybe being the closest
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
He's practically a Durant clone.lettherebehouse wrote:Havlicekstealsit wrote:How often did Pippen have to defend a guy with a 7'5" wingspan hoisting up threes?
Clifford Robinson maybe being the closest
Re: LeBron homers owned
Lol, okBush4Ever. wrote:Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.Deez wrote:
Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant.
He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
Re: LeBron homers owned
Stick to MMA talkBush4Ever. wrote:Not sure why you are LOLing.UNC MJ FAN. wrote:
LOL
Penny destroyed Pippen at or near his peak.
Pre-Prime Kobe got his against Pippen H2H (albeit post-prime Pippen).
Durant would be the best scorer Pippen has ever gone up against H2H, and cannot be reliably stopped or slowed down within single coverage.
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 155049
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: LeBron homers owned
1995 magic had the best offense of all time at a 115.5 ratingCleveTown™ wrote:Jordan reminds me of Sportswise. So easily triggered and trollable.
And what did he raise his eyebrows up for when GOAT mentioned he beat the greatest team of all time?
He did.
And had the Warriors played in MJ's era they would have run the season. 82-0.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: LeBron homers owned
You're making a fool of yourself Deez. Pippen was a great wing defender. No one disputes that. But he wasn't some God. And he never faced someone with the skill set Durant possesses. The Warriors just had too many weapons at their peak.Deez wrote:Lol, okBush4Ever. wrote:Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.Deez wrote:
Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant.
He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
The bigger problem for the Bulls is just having to defend 30 feet in, instead of 15-18. The Warriors can spread you out and then put it on the floor and finish when you try to defend them out. The Bulls couldn't do that. Their 3 point shooting was generally poor and definitely poor off the dribble. It relied on spot up and was still not remotely close to what the Warriors can do to you.