AtiliusRegulus wrote:
the anus was never meant to be a place to be penetrated regularly and to be the recipient of male ejaculation.
So they were having sex in public now?
Full penetration?
Or is that just what was disturbingly going through your fomented mind while they did nothing fundametally wrong
IMG_6176.JPG
I'm dead on right...and you even know this
..they broke no laws..weren't having sex in public..no proof they would have sex..all they did was dress in leather and pretend to be a pet...
Any immoral act is basically in your fucked up head and you are projecting it at innocent people...you have serious issue you pervert faggot
elartman1973 wrote:
..they broke no laws..weren't having sex in public..no proof they would have sex..all they did was dress in leather and pretend to be a pet...
Any immoral act is basically in your fucked up head and you are projecting it at innocent people...you have serious issue you pervert faggot
elartman1973 wrote:
..they broke no laws..weren't having sex in public..no proof they would have sex..all they did was dress in leather and pretend to be a pet...
Any immoral act is basically in your fucked up head and you are projecting it at innocent people...you have serious issue you pervert faggot
You are completely insane.
Go away.
Check the method from Bedrock, 'cause I rock your head to bed
elartman1973 wrote:
..they broke no laws..weren't having sex in public..no proof they would have sex..all they did was dress in leather and pretend to be a pet...
Any immoral act is basically in your fucked up head and you are projecting it at innocent people...you have serious issue you pervert faggot
You are completely insane.
Go away.
No..I'm completely correct...
No laws broken...
You don't want kids there then blame the parents...nobody else is to blame
Sudanese Sensation wrote:I have an elegant solution. If you don't want your children to be exposed to such things don't take them to Gay Pride parades.
I'm pretty sure we can "fight" for decency and normal social behavior *and* not place our children directly in the paths of human-slave-pets or whatever it is.
If I want to go to NYC for the day for something fun with my family, I don't want to have to do recon on whether or not we are going to be walking parellel to old men in leather chaps, or semi-nude oiled men in purple panties, or the aforementioned human-leather-pets.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:I have an elegant solution. If you don't want your children to be exposed to such things don't take them to Gay Pride parades.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:I have an elegant solution. If you don't want your children to be exposed to such things don't take them to Gay Pride parades.
I'm pretty sure we can "fight" for decency and normal social behavior *and* not place our children directly in the paths of human-slave-pets or whatever it is.
If I want to go to NYC for the day for something fun with my family, I don't want to have to do recon on whether or not we are going to be walking parellel to old men in leather chaps, or semi-nude oiled men in purple panties, or the aforementioned human-leather-pets.
You are free to agitate for whatever behavior you deem acceptable. I will defer to John Stuart Mill, “over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.”
The good people of New York countenance the behavior you find unacceptable by electing and re-electing officials like Bill De Blasio whose offices provide the permits for these parades. Are their rights deemed worthy of protection ?
As to leather couture I prefer those wearing it are attractive women, though I have zero desire to put another human being on a leash. Vive la difference.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:I have an elegant solution. If you don't want your children to be exposed to such things don't take them to Gay Pride parades.
I'm pretty sure we can "fight" for decency and normal social behavior *and* not place our children directly in the paths of human-slave-pets or whatever it is.
If I want to go to NYC for the day for something fun with my family, I don't want to have to do recon on whether or not we are going to be walking parellel to old men in leather chaps, or semi-nude oiled men in purple panties, or the aforementioned human-leather-pets.
Then avoid the village altogether....
Its part of life and part of the fabric of America..like it or not...
Better to be educated about it than to play dumb...Americans have been playing dumb for far too long...that's where racism and judgement and hate come from...LACK OF EDUCATION AND IGNORANCE...
Why do people not understand you can acknowledge someone's right to X, but champion the idea they don't do X because of basic human decency, social norms, etc...?
elartman1973 wrote:
Then avoid the village altogether....
Its part of life and part of the fabric of America..like it or not...
Better to be educated about it than to play dumb...Americans have been playing dumb for far too long...that's where racism and judgement and hate come from...LACK OF EDUCATION AND IGNORANCE...
Gay men in chaps and human pets crawling around the city isn't what made America great.
Bush4Ever35 wrote:Why do people not understand you can acknowledge someone's right to X, but champion the idea they don't do X because of basic human decency, social norms, etc...?
It's very simple.
Maybe we agree. There is a lot of behavior I find offensive. My tastes, predilections, inclinations are rather vanilla. I prefer persuasion rather than enlisting the heavy hand of the state to stop it.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:I have an elegant solution. If you don't want your children to be exposed to such things don't take them to Gay Pride parades.
I'm pretty sure we can "fight" for decency and normal social behavior *and* not place our children directly in the paths of human-slave-pets or whatever it is.
If I want to go to NYC for the day for something fun with my family, I don't want to have to do recon on whether or not we are going to be walking parellel to old men in leather chaps, or semi-nude oiled men in purple panties, or the aforementioned human-leather-pets.
Then avoid the village altogether....
Its part of life and part of the fabric of America..like it or not...
Better to be educated about it than to play dumb...Americans have been playing dumb for far too long...that's where racism and judgement and hate come from...LACK OF EDUCATION AND IGNORANCE...
Uhhh.... what precisely do you think they were showcasing, fella?
Sudanese Sensation wrote:
Maybe we agree. There is a lot of behavior I find offensive. My tastes, predilections, inclinations are rather vanilla. I prefer persuasion rather than enlisting the heavy hand of the state to stop it.
I don't want Trump to thump their skulls over their illness. Of course.
I'm probably more anti-state than anyone on this board.
But the same rights damn better be extended to me by others.
In NYC, simply wearing a MAGA hat is risking imprisonment, assault/battery, and extreme verbal harassment and mockery.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:
Maybe we agree. There is a lot of behavior I find offensive. My tastes, predilections, inclinations are rather vanilla. I prefer persuasion rather than enlisting the heavy hand of the state to stop it.
I don't want Trump to thump their skulls over their illness. Of course.
I'm probably more anti-state than anyone on this board.
But the same rights damn better be extended to me by others.
In NYC, simply wearing a MAGA hat is risking imprisonment, assault/battery, and extreme verbal harassment and mockery.
What's good for the goose...
You would have to change the culture of NYC. That being said I would defend your right to rock your MAGA hat anywhere in the USA.
Last edited by Sudanese Sensation on Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It’s their rights to wear leather animal outfits and be walked on leashes in front of impressionable kids.... and it’s our rights to be disgusted by it and laugh at them.
Sudanese Sensation wrote:
You would have to change the culture of NYC. That being said I would defend your right to rock your MAGA hat anywhere in the USA.
Yes, that's what we ("we") are attempting to do. Of course, any one of us is likely to move the needle a teeny-tiny amount, but we can at least try to fight for the good.
Even when I was an out-and-out Atheist instead of whatever I am now, I would have preferred more traditional families and even more Bibles, compared to sex orgies and barely clothed men running around town all oiled up (even if they have great bodies).
Sudanese Sensation wrote:
You would have to change the culture of NYC. That being said I would defend your right to rock your MAGA hat anywhere in the USA.
Yes, that's what we ("we") are attempting to do. Of course, any one of us is likely to move the needle a teeny-tiny amount, but we can at least try to fight for the good.
Even when I was an out-and-out Atheist instead of whatever I am now, I would have preferred more traditional families and even more Bibles, compared to sex orgies and barely clothed men running around town all oiled up (even if they have great bodies).
I believe the outfits you find objectionable and I find laughable are mostly for private use.
Bush4Ever35 wrote:
I'm pretty sure we can "fight" for decency and normal social behavior *and* not place our children directly in the paths of human-slave-pets or whatever it is.
If I want to go to NYC for the day for something fun with my family, I don't want to have to do recon on whether or not we are going to be walking parellel to old men in leather chaps, or semi-nude oiled men in purple panties, or the aforementioned human-leather-pets.
Then avoid the village altogether....
Its part of life and part of the fabric of America..like it or not...
Better to be educated about it than to play dumb...Americans have been playing dumb for far too long...that's where racism and judgement and hate come from...LACK OF EDUCATION AND IGNORANCE...
Uhhh.... what precisely do you think they were showcasing, fella?
