Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
- Kennethgriffin
- Banned User
- Posts: 13533
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:24 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
the 18-0 record doesn't carry into the playoffs though lol
and its 1 game elimination in football so its pretty random who wins sometimes
imagine if the nba was like that.
the heat win in 2011 with wade as finals mvp
then lose in 2012, 2013 and 2016
lebrons legacy would be utter shit LOL
and its 1 game elimination in football so its pretty random who wins sometimes
imagine if the nba was like that.
the heat win in 2011 with wade as finals mvp
then lose in 2012, 2013 and 2016
lebrons legacy would be utter shit LOL
- americaninfidel
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 13968
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
It would be interesting to see the Super Bowl turned into a best of three. Never happen, but it would be interesting.
Fear is the mind killer. We are not afraid.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
He'd still lose to the Giants`Max. wrote:Tom would have even more rings.americaninfidel wrote:It would be interesting to see the Super Bowl turned into a best of three. Never happen, but it would be interesting.
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Injuries galore...americaninfidel wrote:It would be interesting to see the Super Bowl turned into a best of three. Never happen, but it would be interesting.
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.elmerjfudd wrote:He'd still lose to the Giants`Max. wrote:Tom would have even more rings.americaninfidel wrote:It would be interesting to see the Super Bowl turned into a best of three. Never happen, but it would be interesting.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote:Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.elmerjfudd wrote:He'd still lose to the Giants`Max. wrote:
Tom would have even more rings.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
No. Just stupid.Max. wrote:Are you drunk?elmerjfudd wrote:They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote: Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Lol at stupid Brady fans thinking they beat the Giants in a best out of three series. `
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Yes and you know that the Pats wanted them that second time.elmerjfudd wrote:They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote:Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.elmerjfudd wrote:
He'd still lose to the Giants`
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
The only time Belichick looked happy is when he beat an injury plague Giants team last season. Belichick is the king but Giants own him.... only a retard would argue against.Smelters wrote:Yes and you know that the Pats wanted them that second time.elmerjfudd wrote:They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote: Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
The Giants won the first one on pure fluke. Everyone with an IQ above room temperature knows this, but alas, you are pretty stupid.elmerjfudd wrote:They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote:Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.elmerjfudd wrote:
He'd still lose to the Giants`
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Only a retard like yourself claims fluke... the Giants beat them by smacking Brady in his mouth.Kevin wrote:The Giants won the first one on pure fluke. Everyone with an IQ above room temperature knows this, but alas, you are pretty stupid.elmerjfudd wrote:They beat them both years and beat them 2-0.Kevin wrote: Definitely not in 2007 and probably not in 2011 either. The Patriots were way way better in 2007 and still a notably better team the second time too.
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Yeah, the David Tyree catch definitely wasn't a fluke. I mean, he only played a handful of games the rest of his NFL career after that, but you're right, no fluke at all. Asante Samuel dropping a game ending interception, also not a fluke.
You should be grateful for those two Super Bowls, because the better team lost both of them. Point to me anyone who actually thinks the 07 Giants were a better team than the 2007 Patriots and I'll show you a complete brain dead moron who needs 24/7 assistance to live and function.
You should be grateful for those two Super Bowls, because the better team lost both of them. Point to me anyone who actually thinks the 07 Giants were a better team than the 2007 Patriots and I'll show you a complete brain dead moron who needs 24/7 assistance to live and function.
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Brady almost blew it in that AFC title game with his 3-4 picks. Pats were fortunate Rivers fucking sucks though.
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
He was way worse in that game than we was in the Super Bowl. He was actually quite good in the Super Bowl considering the immense pressure he was under all game long. I think most QB's would have thrown a pick or two. Brady didn't throw any and did lead his team to the go ahead (and should have been winning) score, before his defense choked it away.Havlicekstealsit wrote:Brady almost blew it in that AFC title game with his 3-4 picks. Pats were fortunate Rivers fucking sucks though.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15546
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
In 2008, Tyree was placed on injured reserve for a knee injury suffered during training camp after being on the physically-unable-to-perform list most of the season.Kevin wrote:Yeah, the David Tyree catch definitely wasn't a fluke. I mean, he only played a handful of games the rest of his NFL career after that, but you're right, no fluke at all. Asante Samuel dropping a game ending interception, also not a fluke.
You should be grateful for those two Super Bowls, because the better team lost both of them. Point to me anyone who actually thinks the 07 Giants were a better team than the 2007 Patriots and I'll show you a complete brain dead moron who needs 24/7 assistance to live and function.
Wait a cornerback dropped a pass, well gee it has to be a fluke... idiot.
- Jims_Doors
- Role Player
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:08 pm
Re: Tom Brady's take on teams blowing 3-1 leads
Rivers played that game with a sprained left MCL and a partially torn ACL in his right knee.Havlicekstealsit wrote:Brady almost blew it in that AFC title game with his 3-4 picks. Pats were fortunate Rivers fucking sucks though.
Tomlinson played like 2 series and left the game for good with a sprained MCL and Antonio Gates had a dislocated toe.
Check the facts next time brah.