2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
The results are in. In a runoff, Tony Parker was voted as the #45 greatest post-merger player of all-time.
Each thread will be stickied to the general board until the given round is over. Nominations will be open for the remainder of the project.
1. Michael Jordan
2. Tim Duncan
3. Earvin Magic Johnson
4. Larry Bird
5. Shaquille O'Neal
6. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
7. Kobe Bryant
8. Hakeem Olajuwon
9. Lebron James
10. Moses Malone
11. Kevin Garnett
12. David Robinson
13. Dirk Nowitzki
14. Karl Malone
15. Dwyane Wade
16. Julius Erving
17. Charles Barkley
18. Scottie Pippen
19. Isiah Thomas
20. John Stockton
21. Patrick Ewing
22. Clyde Drexler
23. Steve Nash
24. Kevin McHale
25. Kevin Durant
26. Gary Payton
27. Jason Kidd
28. George Gervin
29. Chris Paul
30. Allen Iverson
31. Paul Pierce
32. Bill Walton Dwight Howard
34. Robert Parish
35. Pau Gasol
36. Alonzo Mourning
37. Dominique Wilkins
38. Dennis Rodman
39. Dennis Johnson
40. Stephen Curry
41.Reggie Miller
42. James Worthy
43. Ray Allen
44. Dikembe Mutombo
45. Tony Parker
Begin by casting your vote for #45 from these candidates:
Alex English -
Manu Ginobili - 2
Ben Wallace -
Tracy McGrady - 5
Chris Mullin -
Chauncey Billups -
Kevin Johnson - 1
Yao - 1
Total Votes: 9
I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Tougn call this round. Id go Manu or one of the 04 pistons
- americaninfidel
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 13968
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Ginobili!
Fear is the mind killer. We are not afraid.
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Nominate Robert Horry. Boom.
- elmerjfudd
- The Lurker
- Posts: 15601
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:23 pm
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Def needs to get on this list before Dwight, BEEEECAUUUSE.....elmerjfudd wrote:Yao Ming.
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Yao>Dwight when healthy?Havlicekstealsit wrote:Def needs to get on this list before Dwight, BEEEECAUUUSE.....elmerjfudd wrote:Yao Ming.
- Robceltsfan
- Pick 'Em League Champion
- Posts: 52871
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
- Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Gonna stick with T-Mac. Head and shoulders better than any remaining player.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
~George Carlin~
~George Carlin~
- PhutureDynasty
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 32431
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:14 pm
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
I'll also go with T-Mac.
- 876Stephen
- Fantasy Football Champ
- Posts: 7697
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:22 pm
- Location: San Rafael, California
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
T-Mac for me as well.
I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46814
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Not hating on Tmac, and I think the selections at this point are all kind of congruous, but I'd be willing to hear how some of you are choosing a volume scorer at 42-45% shooting over a guy who put up close to a 20-10 on 50% shooting for roughly the same peak length and raised his game in as many postseasons.
- Robceltsfan
- Pick 'Em League Champion
- Posts: 52871
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:42 am
- Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
McGrady was no slouch in the playoffs. Over 6 appearances in his prime he averaged roughly 30/7/7 on 43%.Havlicekstealsit wrote:Not hating on Tmac, and I think the selections at this point are all kind of congruous, but I'd be willing to hear how some of you are choosing a volume scorer at 42-45% shooting over a guy who put up close to a 20-10 on 50% shooting for roughly the same peak length and raised his game in as many postseasons.
Nobody else on the list can come close to those numbers.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
~George Carlin~
~George Carlin~
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
From an individual standpoint, McGrady was a better player. He did have a few efficiency issues but that came during a time when he was the only offensive threat.Havlicekstealsit wrote:Not hating on Tmac, and I think the selections at this point are all kind of congruous, but I'd be willing to hear how some of you are choosing a volume scorer at 42-45% shooting over a guy who put up close to a 20-10 on 50% shooting for roughly the same peak length and raised his game in as many postseasons.
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Manu, despite playing limited minutes over his career, is also a very productive player that was a great individual talent.
I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
- americaninfidel
- All-Time Great
- Posts: 13968
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
I've always felt like he had both the talent and the tenacity to have been "the man" on another team. It's a testament to his professionalism that he's willingly taken a back seat in San Antonio. Or maybe a testament to his desire to win.y2ktors wrote:Manu, despite playing limited minutes over his career, is also a very productive player that was a great individual talent.
Fear is the mind killer. We are not afraid.
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
In these "what would Player X have done with a larger role" debates, there's no way to prove anything definitively, obviously. That said, when it comes to Manu, I'm one of the people (and I think I'm in the minority here) who actually thinks that he was in the perfect role and on the perfect team to maximize his talents (similar to Draymond Green in that regard) as opposed to being a superstar who sacrificed individual numbers for the good of the team.americaninfidel wrote:I've always felt like he had both the talent and the tenacity to have been "the man" on another team. It's a testament to his professionalism that he's willingly taken a back seat in San Antonio. Or maybe a testament to his desire to win.y2ktors wrote:Manu, despite playing limited minutes over his career, is also a very productive player that was a great individual talent.
As a rangy, snake-like combo-guard capable of explosive scoring outbursts (and with a knack for drawing fouls and/or flopping), I see the similarities to Dwyane Wade and James Harden. Here's the thing, though: Harden's last year in OKC-- the year he broke out, and was the 3rd best player on his team-- his efficiency was the best of his career (before and after). He shot .491 from the field and .390 from beyond the arc-- both career highs to-date. When LeBron showed up in Miami and Wade's role diminished, his overall numbers dropped but his efficiency sky-rocketed-- he shot over 50% from the field every year LeBron was there save one-- where he shot .497-- and he's never done that any other year in his career before or after.
When Harden and Wade were not the top option, their efficiency went through the roof. Manu has spent his entire NBA career as a 2nd or 3rd option, and he's never been a tremendously efficient player-- .450 / .368 for his career.
Looking at this objectively, it's hard for me to believe that his efficiency would have improved had he been forced to take more shots as a "#1 option." More likely than not, I think he probably would have been a 21-23ppg scorer shooting in the 40-43% range. If that's what a guy is giving you on offense-- and it's not like he's ever been anything more than a marginal defender-- it's hard to for me to say that he's been a self-sacrificing star.
For the record, I'm taking TMac here. For a short stretch, he was pretty much universally considered one of the best players in the game. You can't say that about any of the other guys who are left.
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
The thing about Manu was that he was so well-rounded offensively that I don't think that he'd have a dropoff in efficiency. He drew fouls at a very good rate as well. He's not the caliber of volume scorer as Wade, T-Mac or that type of player. He's probably a very good #2 at best. However, that isn't what many people initially think of him.rtiff68 wrote:In these "what would Player X have done with a larger role" debates, there's no way to prove anything definitively, obviously. That said, when it comes to Manu, I'm one of the people (and I think I'm in the minority here) who actually thinks that he was in the perfect role and on the perfect team to maximize his talents (similar to Draymond Green in that regard) as opposed to being a superstar who sacrificed individual numbers for the good of the team.americaninfidel wrote:I've always felt like he had both the talent and the tenacity to have been "the man" on another team. It's a testament to his professionalism that he's willingly taken a back seat in San Antonio. Or maybe a testament to his desire to win.y2ktors wrote:Manu, despite playing limited minutes over his career, is also a very productive player that was a great individual talent.
As a rangy, snake-like combo-guard capable of explosive scoring outbursts (and with a knack for drawing fouls and/or flopping), I see the similarities to Dwyane Wade and James Harden. Here's the thing, though: Harden's last year in OKC-- the year he broke out, and was the 3rd best player on his team-- his efficiency was the best of his career (before and after). He shot .491 from the field and .390 from beyond the arc-- both career highs to-date. When LeBron showed up in Miami and Wade's role diminished, his overall numbers dropped but his efficiency sky-rocketed-- he shot over 50% from the field every year LeBron was there save one-- where he shot .497-- and he's never done that any other year in his career before or after.
When Harden and Wade were not the top option, their efficiency went through the roof. Manu has spent his entire NBA career as a 2nd or 3rd option, and he's never been a tremendously efficient player-- .450 / .368 for his career.
Looking at this objectively, it's hard for me to believe that his efficiency would have improved had he been forced to take more shots as a "#1 option." More likely than not, I think he probably would have been a 21-23ppg scorer shooting in the 40-43% range. If that's what a guy is giving you on offense-- and it's not like he's ever been anything more than a marginal defender-- it's hard to for me to say that he's been a self-sacrificing star.
For the record, I'm taking TMac here. For a short stretch, he was pretty much universally considered one of the best players in the game. You can't say that about any of the other guys who are left.
What he did bring to the table, skills wise, is more than what Parker brings. He just played his role and had a very nice career.
I'm a baaaddd motherfucker!!
Re: 2015 Anger General Greatest post-merger Players of All Time #46
Off of the top of my head, TMac is the only player I can think of who didn't have a drop-off in efficiency once his role changed from 2nd/3rd option to #1 option. It pretty much happens to everyone, no matter how good they are. If you are the opposing defense's number one priority and you're going to be taking more shots and more difficult shots, it simply stands to reason that your efficiency is going to suffer.y2ktors wrote:The thing about Manu was that he was so well-rounded offensively that I don't think that he'd have a dropoff in efficiency. He drew fouls at a very good rate as well. He's not the caliber of volume scorer as Wade, T-Mac or that type of player. He's probably a very good #2 at best. However, that isn't what many people initially think of him.rtiff68 wrote:In these "what would Player X have done with a larger role" debates, there's no way to prove anything definitively, obviously. That said, when it comes to Manu, I'm one of the people (and I think I'm in the minority here) who actually thinks that he was in the perfect role and on the perfect team to maximize his talents (similar to Draymond Green in that regard) as opposed to being a superstar who sacrificed individual numbers for the good of the team.americaninfidel wrote:
I've always felt like he had both the talent and the tenacity to have been "the man" on another team. It's a testament to his professionalism that he's willingly taken a back seat in San Antonio. Or maybe a testament to his desire to win.
As a rangy, snake-like combo-guard capable of explosive scoring outbursts (and with a knack for drawing fouls and/or flopping), I see the similarities to Dwyane Wade and James Harden. Here's the thing, though: Harden's last year in OKC-- the year he broke out, and was the 3rd best player on his team-- his efficiency was the best of his career (before and after). He shot .491 from the field and .390 from beyond the arc-- both career highs to-date. When LeBron showed up in Miami and Wade's role diminished, his overall numbers dropped but his efficiency sky-rocketed-- he shot over 50% from the field every year LeBron was there save one-- where he shot .497-- and he's never done that any other year in his career before or after.
When Harden and Wade were not the top option, their efficiency went through the roof. Manu has spent his entire NBA career as a 2nd or 3rd option, and he's never been a tremendously efficient player-- .450 / .368 for his career.
Looking at this objectively, it's hard for me to believe that his efficiency would have improved had he been forced to take more shots as a "#1 option." More likely than not, I think he probably would have been a 21-23ppg scorer shooting in the 40-43% range. If that's what a guy is giving you on offense-- and it's not like he's ever been anything more than a marginal defender-- it's hard to for me to say that he's been a self-sacrificing star.
For the record, I'm taking TMac here. For a short stretch, he was pretty much universally considered one of the best players in the game. You can't say that about any of the other guys who are left.
What he did bring to the table, skills wise, is more than what Parker brings. He just played his role and had a very nice career.
Manu is a good, versatile player who has never been afraid of the big moment. That said, is he even a part of this conversation right now if he hadn't played his entire career with Tim Duncan? He's being mentioned right now in the same breath as guys like TMac, Allen, and Mullin, and I feel pretty comfortable saying that those guys would have likely had similar careers regardless of who drafted them.