A lot of people dislike Ripper. That's obvious. But I don't think anyone thinks he's stupid. I don't dislike you. But I know you're stupid. As do many others here. You weren't voted up there with aspy as the dumbest on the board because you are disliked. If that were the case, guys like TDK, dwcmwa, riley and others would be cleaning up in that poll. You're voted that way because, well, you're stupid.King Deez wrote:Right because Ripper has shown his stupidity enough times already. He has followed me around for quite some time now, it's nothing new but maybe you are slow?vcsgrizzfan wrote:Right. Ripper is universally loved and everyone here would pick you as the Bulls fan to chime in against. Or maybe not.King Deez wrote: No wait, this message board is 100% truth to it, forget my recent post. Everybody on here is honest and doesn't troll or lie in anyway, you are right. I wish had the "message board" life of some of the rich folks on here making hundreds of thousands at ease and banging hot chicks daily, living in the best city in the world. What was I thinking?
Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
-
vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
-
lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 56952
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Exactly...I don't understand why Deez is upset over this. I'd rather be dumb and liked, than not dumb while being an asshole.vcsgrizzfan wrote:A lot of people dislike Ripper. That's obvious. But I don't think anyone thinks he's stupid. I don't dislike you. But I know you're stupid. As do many others here. You weren't voted up there with aspy as the dumbest on the board because you are disliked. If that were the case, guys like TDK, dwcmwa, riley and others would be cleaning up in that poll. You're voted that way because, well, you're stupid.King Deez wrote:Right because Ripper has shown his stupidity enough times already. He has followed me around for quite some time now, it's nothing new but maybe you are slow?vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Right. Ripper is universally loved and everyone here would pick you as the Bulls fan to chime in against. Or maybe not.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
If you think he's not stupid then I have to question your intelligence also. You "think" i'm stupid cause you got trolled, i understand that. I guess i'll just accept the stupid opinions you guys decide on. It's coolvcsgrizzfan wrote:A lot of people dislike Ripper. That's obvious. But I don't think anyone thinks he's stupid. I don't dislike you. But I know you're stupid. As do many others here. You weren't voted up there with aspy as the dumbest on the board because you are disliked. If that were the case, guys like TDK, dwcmwa, riley and others would be cleaning up in that poll. You're voted that way because, well, you're stupid.King Deez wrote:Right because Ripper has shown his stupidity enough times already. He has followed me around for quite some time now, it's nothing new but maybe you are slow?vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Right. Ripper is universally loved and everyone here would pick you as the Bulls fan to chime in against. Or maybe not.
-
elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 152347
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Deez getting clobbered here
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
deezna trolling all us stupid people this whole time.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
See this is how stupid you are. You don't know when I'm trolling, i guess i win then. I am not trolling in this thread by any means, other threads I have and most of the time i was but you guys are so smart that you got me and told me what I was really doing. That's cool, I wish i knew if i was trolling or not.ripper76 wrote:deezna trolling all us stupid people this whole time.
-
elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 152347
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Fascinating.King Deez wrote:See this is how stupid you are. You don't know when I'm trolling, i guess i win then. I am not trolling in this thread by any means, other threads I have and most of the time i was but you guys are so smart that you got me and told me what I was really doing. That's cool, I wish i knew if i was trolling or not.ripper76 wrote:deezna trolling all us stupid people this whole time.
-
lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 56952
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
LOL
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Oh my bad, once again I should have just not said I wasn't trolling. Uff how dare I let you know i'm being serious, that's just a dumb move.lettherebehouse wrote:LOL
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
-
denali4eva
- Queen Bee
- Posts: 28696
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:41 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Wait, ripper is universally loved here? I must have missed that memo...
-
lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 56952
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
King Deez wrote:Uff how dare I let you know i'm being serious, that's just a dumb move.lettherebehouse wrote:LOL
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
Finally, we see eye to eye on something. You quick SOB you.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
lettherebehouse wrote:King Deez wrote:Uff how dare I let you know i'm being serious, that's just a dumb move.lettherebehouse wrote:LOL
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
Finally, we see eye to eye on something. You quick SOB you.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
denali4eva wrote:Wait, ripper is universally loved here? I must have missed that memo...
-
denali4eva
- Queen Bee
- Posts: 28696
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:41 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
ripper76 wrote:denali4eva wrote:Wait, ripper is universally loved here? I must have missed that memo...
You are loved by me (even though you ain't down with the brown)...
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
All women love me. Some of them just don't know it yet.denali4eva wrote:ripper76 wrote:denali4eva wrote:Wait, ripper is universally loved here? I must have missed that memo...
You are loved by me (even though you ain't down with the brown)...
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
That was at least two today, maybe three.lettherebehouse wrote:LOL
Another classic meltdown by Deez. What kind of newb admits to when they're trolling or not trolling?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
So ripper are you a NBA junkie?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Really just the Heat. I'll watch all of their games if I can, but if they're not playing I don't have a whole lot of interest.elmouse03 wrote:So ripper are you a NBA junkie?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
That's pretty much how I am with the Bulls. Pretty excited about this year and am interested in Winslow.ripper76 wrote:Really just the Heat. I'll watch all of their games if I can, but if they're not playing I don't have a whole lot of interest.elmouse03 wrote:So ripper are you a NBA junkie?