Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 152383
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/07/espn-al ... n=facebook" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
- elartman1973
- El Padrino
- Posts: 152383
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
- Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Read the article...breaks it down between all the sportsKing Deez wrote:fuck no
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Too much to read. I'm not paying 36 a month for espnelartman1973 wrote:Read the article...breaks it down between all the sportsKing Deez wrote:fuck no
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
"Durrrrrr!! Reading too hard."King Deez wrote:Too much to read. I'm not paying 36 a month for espnelartman1973 wrote:Read the article...breaks it down between all the sportsKing Deez wrote:fuck no
- PhutureDynasty
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 31706
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:14 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Not a chance.
#NeverForgetTheClosingOfTheForum
#NeverForgetTheClosingOfTheForum
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
I'm boycotting everything ESPN.
- denali4eva
- Queen Bee
- Posts: 28696
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:41 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
You have your picket signs and pitchfork all ready to go?Incognito wrote:I'm boycotting everything ESPN.
- Havlicekstealsit
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 46616
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Considering every pro sport league has their own television network, really the only sports that would be affected are college level hoops & football, as ESPN has a stranglehold on them and their spinoffs (SEC Network, Longhorn, etc).
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Durrrr, dont' have time to sit and read 50 paragraphs, durrrr. Are you always so stupid?ripper76 wrote:"Durrrrrr!! Reading too hard."King Deez wrote:Too much to read. I'm not paying 36 a month for espnelartman1973 wrote: Read the article...breaks it down between all the sports
- manchild98
- Hidden Member
- Posts: 13933
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:05 pm
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
I don't care about the nba so I wouldn't pay it. I'd be missing some college football and college basketball but there is still a shit ton of those games on other networks.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Yet you have time to make 18,000 posts here, each more useless than the last.King Deez wrote:Durrrr, dont' have time to sit and read 50 paragraphs, durrrr. Are you always so stupid?ripper76 wrote:"Durrrrrr!! Reading too hard."King Deez wrote: Too much to read. I'm not paying 36 a month for espn
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Artman. Would you pay 36 a month for ESPN?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
Yes because 18,000 posts throughout a year and a half is the same as sitting and reading a book all at one time. Seriously, were you born in a dumpster?ripper76 wrote:Yet you have time to make 18,000 posts here, each more useless than the last.King Deez wrote:Durrrr, dont' have time to sit and read 50 paragraphs, durrrr. Are you always so stupid?ripper76 wrote:
"Durrrrrr!! Reading too hard."
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
nah...I got my news here.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
The article is 1400 words. Hardly a book.King Deez wrote:Yes because 18,000 posts throughout a year and a half is the same as sitting and reading a book all at one time. Seriously, were you born in a dumpster?ripper76 wrote:Yet you have time to make 18,000 posts here, each more useless than the last.King Deez wrote: Durrrr, dont' have time to sit and read 50 paragraphs, durrrr. Are you always so stupid?
Unless you're retarded, it shouldn't take more that 10 minutes to read that much. Most functionally literate adults could read it in 5.
Are you retarded?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
lol, how dumb are you rip? Once again I'm not reading some stupid 10 minute article all at once that I don't care about. I seriously think you needed to be added to a stupid list.ripper76 wrote:The article is 1400 words. Hardly a book.King Deez wrote:Yes because 18,000 posts throughout a year and a half is the same as sitting and reading a book all at one time. Seriously, were you born in a dumpster?ripper76 wrote:
Yet you have time to make 18,000 posts here, each more useless than the last.
Unless you're retarded, it shouldn't take more that 10 minutes to read that much. Most functionally literate adults could read it in 5.
Are you retarded?
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
How much time have you spent in this thread?King Deez wrote:lol, how dumb are you rip? Once again I'm not reading some stupid 10 minute article all at once that I don't care about. I seriously think you needed to be added to a stupid list.ripper76 wrote:The article is 1400 words. Hardly a book.King Deez wrote: Yes because 18,000 posts throughout a year and a half is the same as sitting and reading a book all at one time. Seriously, were you born in a dumpster?
Unless you're retarded, it shouldn't take more that 10 minutes to read that much. Most functionally literate adults could read it in 5.
Are you retarded?
You seem to be getting upset.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
I'm more entertained at the fact that you are quite stupid. It's pretty funny actually.ripper76 wrote:How much time have you spent in this thread?King Deez wrote:lol, how dumb are you rip? Once again I'm not reading some stupid 10 minute article all at once that I don't care about. I seriously think you needed to be added to a stupid list.ripper76 wrote:
The article is 1400 words. Hardly a book.
Unless you're retarded, it shouldn't take more that 10 minutes to read that much. Most functionally literate adults could read it in 5.
Are you retarded?
You seem to be getting upset.
Re: Would you pay $36 a month for ESPN?
I believe you are the one who was recently voted as one of the dumbest posters on the board.King Deez wrote:I'm more entertained at the fact that you are quite stupid. It's pretty funny actually.ripper76 wrote:How much time have you spent in this thread?King Deez wrote: lol, how dumb are you rip? Once again I'm not reading some stupid 10 minute article all at once that I don't care about. I seriously think you needed to be added to a stupid list.
You seem to be getting upset.