You are reading too much into it.americaninfidel wrote:Agreed. My response, though technically to your post, was really to Shill's insinuation that menstruation could be considered "killing" (i.e. murdering) a baby.King Deez wrote:Did you originally say natural causes or something? If a person if pregnant and ends that babies life then yeah i'd consider that killing the baby, if they die cause of some other problem with the baby or whatever then no.americaninfidel wrote:
I was expanding on your comment that "killing" babies is wrong to equate to murder (i.e. intentional killing.) The cause of death--abortion or miscarriage--doesn't make the baby more or less dead, but the intent (or lack thereof) to end the pregnancy matters when it comes to defining it as murder.
tl;dr - Shill's full of it.
I typed its flat out wrong.