Hey queer boy Hawks, I got a great idea for you kiddo...

[rileymartin]

Why don't you bump a bunch of my old threads and really teach me a lesson lol!!!!!!!

[kobeunderbite]

Why do you love cock?

[rtiff68]

Is this the part where you start the same thread 15 times in a row and then claim that you're "not emotional?"

Definitely seen this movie before...

[rileymartin]

Is this the part where you start the same thread 15 times in a row and then claim that you're "not emotional?"

Definitely seen this movie before...

I took you on a 25 page ride of your life kiddo.

you are easy pickins for me lol...

[rtiff68]

Is this the part where you start the same thread 15 times in a row and then claim that you're "not emotional?"

Definitely seen this movie before...

I took you on a 25 page ride of your life kiddo.

you are easy pickins for me lol...

I'll take that as a "yes."

[rileymartin]

Is this the part where you start the same thread 15 times in a row and then claim that you're "not emotional?"

Definitely seen this movie before...

I took you on a 25 page ride of your life kiddo.

you are easy pickins for me lol...

I'll take that as a "yes."

You can take it however you want to kiddo. I owned your drunken soul for 25 very emotional pages lol.

[rileymartin]

Is this the part where you start the same thread 15 times in a row and then claim that you're "not emotional?"

Definitely seen this movie before...

I took you on a 25 page ride of your life kiddo.

you are easy pickins for me lol...

I'll take that as a "yes."

No, but, seriously, do you think that Curry simply had a better statistical season than LeBron, or do you think he has actually surpassed him?

[wailuaFC]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

[rileymartin]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

LOL.

[rtiff68]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

I also love the irony: in a thread where Riley is accusing other people of being emotional and "easy pickins," he replied twice to a single post that simply said "I'll take that as a 'yes'"...

...right after he was called out for editing multiple posts after the fact. You have to be pretty emotional and embarrassed to go back and edit multiple posts just to "save face" on an anonymous message board where you're already universally thought of as a whiner with little credibility.

Why spend the time, Riley? What reputation did you think you were salvaging/protecting?

[rileymartin]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

I also love the irony: in a thread where Riley is accusing other people of being emotional and "easy pickins," he replied twice to a single post that simply said "I'll take that as a 'yes'"...

...right after he was called out for editing multiple posts after the fact. You have to be pretty emotional and embarrassed to go back and edit multiple posts just to "save face" on an anonymous message board where you're already universally thought of as a whiner with little credibility.

Why spend the time, Riley? What reputation did you think you were salvaging/protecting?

LOL, easy pickins'.

[rileymartin]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

I also love the irony: in a thread where Riley is accusing other people of being emotional and "easy pickins," he replied twice to a single post that simply said "I'll take that as a 'yes'"...

...right after he was called out for editing multiple posts after the fact. You have to be pretty emotional and embarrassed to go back and edit multiple posts just to "save face" on an anonymous message board where you're already universally thought of as a whiner with little credibility.

Why spend the time, Riley? What reputation did you think you were salvaging/protecting?

But, lets get serious here for a second. What do you think is more embarrassing. Me editing threads, or these kids continuing to bump them even though I am editing them?
and, if i have no credibility, why would you spend 25 pages trying to convince me of something even you didn't believe?

[rtiff68]

It's a really bad look when all you can do as a retort is call someone a gay kiddo or the super inventive queer kiddo.

I also love the irony: in a thread where Riley is accusing other people of being emotional and "easy pickins," he replied twice to a single post that simply said "I'll take that as a 'yes'"...

...right after he was called out for editing multiple posts after the fact. You have to be pretty emotional and embarrassed to go back and edit multiple posts just to "save face" on an anonymous message board where you're already universally thought of as a whiner with little credibility.

Why spend the time, Riley? What reputation did you think you were salvaging/protecting?

LOL, easy pickins'.

There's nothing easy about it: as many others have told you, you put in a LOT of work.

[rileymartin]

I also love the irony: in a thread where Riley is accusing other people of being emotional and "easy pickins," he replied twice to a single post that simply said "I'll take that as a 'yes'"...

...right after he was called out for editing multiple posts after the fact. You have to be pretty emotional and embarrassed to go back and edit multiple posts just to "save face" on an anonymous message board where you're already universally thought of as a whiner with little credibility.

Why spend the time, Riley? What reputation did you think you were salvaging/protecting?

LOL, easy pickins'.

There's nothing easy about it: as many others have told you, you put in a LOT of work.

What takes more work in your opinion...some butthurt kids searching through my posting history, or me editing some threads that are all on the first page?
Lets be real here.

[rileymartin]

Hmmmm...when faced with reality, it looks athough you have gone into your shell. No apology necessarry.

[kobeunderbite]

Why don't you answer my question, Riley?

Why do you love cock?

[rileymartin]

Why don't you answer my question, Riley?

Why do you love cock?

fthkhndoucheghbohkfhnbagfpsgtesaylwuifhgntwhatwcvalokhj

[Repeat3peat]

Riled up Martin feverishly trying to pickens up and alter the easily broken pieces of his posting rep. Poor cock thirsty kiddo.

[rtiff68]

LOL, easy pickins'.

There's nothing easy about it: as many others have told you, you put in a LOT of work.

What takes more work in your opinion...some butthurt kids searching through my posting history, or me editing some threads that are all on the first page?
Lets be real here.

To answer your question (I had to pick my wife up from the airport), you editing threads.

Using the search function takes less than a minute; taking the time to alter multiple posts after the fact to avoid exposure? Well, that pretty much crushes your whole "I was just trolling" angle. Do you ever see Artman, Clevetown, or Madnessss editing their troll posts after the fact?

Of course they don't, because their original intent was to get attention, and bumping those old threads with those opinions accomplishes that. The fact that you felt compelled to change what you said previously proves that you weren't trolling, you were serious, and you attempted to cover your tracks to avoid embarrassment.

Pretty epically pathetic, my friend.

[elmouse03]

Why is riley hitting on hawks?