Kobeunderbite wrote:
Can you believe how gay he is?
I'd fuck Erin right in the pussy!
I'm not gay. I'm a heterosexual male and I proved in on page 3 of this thread when I told everyone I would fuck Erin Andrews with my cock and cum on her face. Do your research.
I've also had a tweet of mine retweet by a famous pornstar, and it gave me an erection for like 15 minutes or so. Which proves that I'm not gay as well. So basically, you're full of shit.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Kobeunderbite wrote:Bush is so gay that he wouldn't even bang a smoking hot broad like Erin Andrews LOL
I might have to rethink my participation in Bush4Ever threads. He probably thinks I'm being flirtatious.
Yikes. I don't want that homo-rubbing faggot near me.
Can you believe how gay he is?
I'd fuck Erin right in the pussy!
He's really gay.
Even though I think she's overrated, I would also have intercourse with Erin Andrews. But I would prefer it to not occur immediately after you did that to her nether-regions. In any case, I'd bang her good because I'm a guy who digs chicks. Unlike Bush who digs girly gay things.
Robceltsfan wrote:
I can't give people general specifics, but when you have people saying they wouldn't fuck Star-X that someone posts, or belittle them by saying Random-Girl-Y in Cubicle-Z is hotter than Star-X.......it's not hard to make the connection.
So basically, you are full of shit? Thanks.
Protip: Saying random cubicle girl is more attractive than Erin Andrews says virtually nothing about the absolute level of attractiveness of either one, neverminding the fact that attractiveness is subjective anyway.
And again...you are seeing the stars at their best COMBINED with a ridiculous amount of built-in advantages, and probably are seeing cubicle girl in a mostly-natural environment.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Kobeunderbite wrote:
Can you believe how gay he is?
I'd fuck Erin right in the pussy!
I'm not gay. I'm a heterosexual male and I proved in on page 3 of this thread when I told everyone I would fuck Erin Andrews with my cock and cum on her face. Do your research.
I've also had a tweet of mine retweet by a famous pornstar, and it gave me an erection for like 15 minutes or so. Which proves that I'm not gay as well. So basically, you're full of shit.
How red-faced are you right now, gay boy? Didn't want to be outed today?
Enjoy sucking your boyfriends dick while I have my penis inside Erin freaking Andrews
Sort of off-topic, but my wife and I had a competition on Hot or Not two years ago, betting on who would have the higher average score after two weeks. She beat me by 0.3 a point, which pissed me off royally, but was probably deserved.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Kobeunderbite wrote:
Can you believe how gay he is?
I'd fuck Erin right in the pussy!
I'm not gay. I'm a heterosexual male and I proved in on page 3 of this thread when I told everyone I would fuck Erin Andrews with my cock and cum on her face. Do your research.
I've also had a tweet of mine retweet by a famous pornstar, and it gave me an erection for like 15 minutes or so. Which proves that I'm not gay as well. So basically, you're full of shit.
How red-faced are you right now, gay boy? Didn't want to be outed today?
Enjoy sucking your boyfriends dick while I have my penis inside Erin freaking Andrews
I feel bad for Mrs. Bush4Ever. She deserves better. Bush should let her leave so she can find a heterosexual male to have sex with.
Robceltsfan wrote:
I can't give people general specifics, but when you have people saying they wouldn't fuck Star-X that someone posts, or belittle them by saying Random-Girl-Y in Cubicle-Z is hotter than Star-X.......it's not hard to make the connection.
So basically, you are full of shit? Thanks.
Protip: Saying random cubicle girl is more attractive than Erin Andrews says virtually nothing about the absolute level of attractiveness of either one, neverminding the fact that attractiveness is subjective anyway.
And again...you are seeing the stars at their best COMBINED with a ridiculous amount of built-in advantages, and probably are seeing cubicle girl in a mostly-natural environment.
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
Robceltsfan wrote:
I can't give people general specifics, but when you have people saying they wouldn't fuck Star-X that someone posts, or belittle them by saying Random-Girl-Y in Cubicle-Z is hotter than Star-X.......it's not hard to make the connection.
So basically, you are full of shit? Thanks.
Protip: Saying random cubicle girl is more attractive than Erin Andrews says virtually nothing about the absolute level of attractiveness of either one, neverminding the fact that attractiveness is subjective anyway.
And again...you are seeing the stars at their best COMBINED with a ridiculous amount of built-in advantages, and probably are seeing cubicle girl in a mostly-natural environment.
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
ATTRACTIVENESS IS SUBJECTIVE (and largely subconscious).
There you go. If your real beef is that people inflate themselves over the internet, just say that outright. No serious person would disagree with that, or even contest that it happens on the internet all the time.
By the way, you aren't seriously comparing everyday makeup to the makeup work and lighting done on female TV reporters are you? They are vastly, vastly different. It's not an "anecdote". It's as close to empirical as you can get.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Bush4Ever wrote:
I'm not gay. I'm a heterosexual male and I proved in on page 3 of this thread when I told everyone I would fuck Erin Andrews with my cock and cum on her face. Do your research.
I've also had a tweet of mine retweet by a famous pornstar, and it gave me an erection for like 15 minutes or so. Which proves that I'm not gay as well. So basically, you're full of shit.
How red-faced are you right now, gay boy? Didn't want to be outed today?
Enjoy sucking your boyfriends dick while I have my penis inside Erin freaking Andrews
I feel bad for Mrs. Bush4Ever. She deserves better. Bush should let her leave so she can find a heterosexual male to have sex with.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
ATTRACTIVENESS IS SUBJECTIVE (and largely subconscious).
There you go. If your real beef is that people inflate themselves over the internet, just say that outright. No serious person would disagree with that, or even contest that it happens on the internet all the time.
By the way, you aren't seriously comparing everyday makeup to the makeup work and lighting done on female TV reporters are you? They are vastly, vastly different. It's not an "anecdote". It's as close to empirical as you can get.
No woman is a 10 without makeup based on the way we objectify women today. If a woman is a 7 waking up in the a.m., she'd possibly get elevated to an 8 with her makeup and a 9 with a TV stylist. It's not like these TV women are 3's and 4's getting transformed into 9's.
I don't see what point you're trying to make.
The OP was about Erin Andrews. Unless you have really weird taste in women, she's attractive. She may not be tops in your book. She may not be a "10" to anyone, but by God......she's fuckable. Seriously. Men are animals when it comes to sex. Unless some type of personal bias is in their way, every man should carry a position of "I'd fuck Erin Andrews given the opportunity".
MEH...........I'm done..........agree to disagree
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
ATTRACTIVENESS IS SUBJECTIVE (and largely subconscious).
There you go. If your real beef is that people inflate themselves over the internet, just say that outright. No serious person would disagree with that, or even contest that it happens on the internet all the time.
By the way, you aren't seriously comparing everyday makeup to the makeup work and lighting done on female TV reporters are you? They are vastly, vastly different. It's not an "anecdote". It's as close to empirical as you can get.
No woman is a 10 without makeup based on the way we objectify women today. If a woman is a 7 waking up in the a.m., she'd possibly get elevated to an 8 with her makeup and a 9 with a TV stylist. It's not like these TV women are 3's and 4's getting transformed into 9's.
I don't see what point you're trying to make.
The OP was about Erin Andrews. Unless you have really weird taste in women, she's attractive. She may not be tops in your book. She may not be a "10" to anyone, but by God......she's fuckable. Seriously. Men are animals when it comes to sex. Unless some type of personal bias is in their way, every man should carry a position of "I'd fuck Erin Andrews given the opportunity".
MEH...........I'm done..........agree to disagree
If you agree that attractiveness is subjective, the statement "weird taste in women" makes absolutely no sense.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Bush4Ever wrote:
ATTRACTIVENESS IS SUBJECTIVE (and largely subconscious).
There you go. If your real beef is that people inflate themselves over the internet, just say that outright. No serious person would disagree with that, or even contest that it happens on the internet all the time.
By the way, you aren't seriously comparing everyday makeup to the makeup work and lighting done on female TV reporters are you? They are vastly, vastly different. It's not an "anecdote". It's as close to empirical as you can get.
No woman is a 10 without makeup based on the way we objectify women today. If a woman is a 7 waking up in the a.m., she'd possibly get elevated to an 8 with her makeup and a 9 with a TV stylist. It's not like these TV women are 3's and 4's getting transformed into 9's.
I don't see what point you're trying to make.
The OP was about Erin Andrews. Unless you have really weird taste in women, she's attractive. She may not be tops in your book. She may not be a "10" to anyone, but by God......she's fuckable. Seriously. Men are animals when it comes to sex. Unless some type of personal bias is in their way, every man should carry a position of "I'd fuck Erin Andrews given the opportunity".
MEH...........I'm done..........agree to disagree
If you agree that attractiveness is subjective, the statement "weird taste in women" makes absolutely no sense.
Attractiveness on some levels is subjective. But it's also like saying liking a blow job is subjective.
If I told you that you were about to get a blowjob that rates a 2, would you say no?
Same thing for this. Unless you tell me that Erin Andrews rates below a 7 on your scale, you'd fuck her.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Doesn't matter. If the star is a 9 "all done up" she's at least a fucking 7 when done up on her own.
Keep in mind, almost any well-kept hottie roaming the streets does her hair/makeup/clothing to make herself look good almost every time she leaves the house. You're anecdote about built-in advantage is next to meaningless to me in this instance.
Erin Andrews is a good looking woman with a fucking sensational body. Any man on this board saying he wouldn't fuck her is flat out lying.
ATTRACTIVENESS IS SUBJECTIVE (and largely subconscious).
There you go. If your real beef is that people inflate themselves over the internet, just say that outright. No serious person would disagree with that, or even contest that it happens on the internet all the time.
By the way, you aren't seriously comparing everyday makeup to the makeup work and lighting done on female TV reporters are you? They are vastly, vastly different. It's not an "anecdote". It's as close to empirical as you can get.
No woman is a 10 without makeup based on the way we objectify women today. If a woman is a 7 waking up in the a.m., she'd possibly get elevated to an 8 with her makeup and a 9 with a TV stylist. It's not like these TV women are 3's and 4's getting transformed into 9's.
I don't see what point you're trying to make.
The OP was about Erin Andrews. Unless you have really weird taste in women, she's attractive. She may not be tops in your book. She may not be a "10" to anyone, but by God......she's fuckable. Seriously. Men are animals when it comes to sex. Unless some type of personal bias is in their way, every man should carry a position of "I'd fuck Erin Andrews given the opportunity".
MEH...........I'm done..........agree to disagree
A personal bias is in my way.... the fact that personality is important to me. A personality that turns me on brings out the attraction of a woman, which would make me want to hook up with the woman without a doubt.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Attractiveness on some levels is subjective. But it's also like saying liking a blow job is subjective.
If I told you that you were about to get a blowjob that rates a 2, would you say no?
Same thing for this. Unless you tell me that Erin Andrews rates below a 7 on your scale, you'd fuck her.
It's weird this bothers you so much. Let people like who they like. Because attractiveness is subjective, you are always going to find people within someone's taste that are outliers when compared to the general population.
Ultimately, you can't draw a perfect line between some of these ideas you are throwing around.
If you don't like people inflating themselves online (I don't either), just say that.
Taking a break from the board. Please reference my last post for more details if you are interested.
Robceltsfan wrote:
Attractiveness on some levels is subjective. But it's also like saying liking a blow job is subjective.
If I told you that you were about to get a blowjob that rates a 2, would you say no?
Same thing for this. Unless you tell me that Erin Andrews rates below a 7 on your scale, you'd fuck her.
It's weird this bothers you so much. Let people like who they like. Because attractiveness is subjective, you are always going to find people within someone's taste that are outliers when compared to the general population.
Ultimately, you can't draw a perfect line between some of these ideas you are throwing around.
If you don't like people inflating themselves online (I don't either), just say that.
I don't have to say that. It's obvious.
Why are we arguing again?
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are dumber than that.
