What's the point of playing, fool. Exactly: To Win.Bush4Ever. wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:35 pmYes, and "impact on winning" need not correlate to winning a title/game, depending on a million different factors.thedangerouskitchen wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:32 pm
Those are your words fool, not mine.
You said "impact on winning" is the criteria used to determine the GOAT... and again, with just 4 rings in 21 years (including one *asterisk* Championship) LeBron simply has not "won" enough to be considered the GOAT.
That's the bottom line. Deal with it.
A player who adds +5 to his team in a 108-100 (i.e.--would have been a 13 point loss without him) loss is impacting winning more than a player who adds + 2 to his team in a 105-100 win (it would have been a 3 point instead of 5 point win without him).
Dummy.
lol!
Thus, first and foremost the criteria MUST look at the player's impact on Championship teams... and thus, by default the "number" of Championship must be factore in, otherwise Dream would be in the GOAT discussion.
And again... LeBron does not own enough Championships to even qualify for GOAT discussion when you have other all-time greats like Russell, MJ, Jabbar, Kobe, Magic, Duncan, Hondo, etc. all with more Rings, and guys like Shaq and Steph with just as many.
Further... that drivel you spewed about adding this or that many points to a team is based on what, exactly? Plus/Minus???
...and you expect to be taken seriously?
Keep trying, little buckaroo.