I was told Curry > Durant

Ali Natural · Post by **Ali Natural** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:29 pm

I wonder if this series has brought those people to their senses?

FPL · Post by **FPL** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:35 pm

Steph is averaging 33 points in the Finals. I think you can argue KD is better, but let's give Toronto some credit here.

Bartman · Post by **Bartman** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:37 pm

Durant isn't even playing, how good can he be right now?

Playing >>> Not playing

FPL · Post by **FPL** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:41 pm

I do think it sucks we were robbed of a prime KD vs Kawhi series. What a shame.

Robceltsfan · Post by **Robceltsfan** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 4:58 pm

KD hasn’t missed a shot yet in the Finals.

GOAT!!!

Bartman · Post by **Bartman** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:00 pm

Robceltsfan wrote:KD hasn’t missed a shot yet in the Finals.

GOAT!!!

That's how dumb these Durant fans are especially that doofus, LNS.

LNS · Post by **LNS** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:10 pm

Curry can beat the shit out of Lebron with or without KD, but apparently it’s a different story when it’s against Kawhi.

Bartman · Post by **Bartman** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:33 pm

LNS wrote:Curry can beat the shit out of Lebron with or without KD, but apparently it’s a different story when it’s against Kawhi.

Without Durant, Curry beat a depleted Cavs team you idiot.

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:15 pm

Nobody ever said curry was better than Durant...where does the.Op get this from?

LNS · Post by **LNS** » Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:05 pm

elartman1973 wrote:Nobody ever said curry was better than Durant...where does the.Op get this from?

Ali Natural · Post by **Ali Natural** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:37 am

elartman1973 wrote:Nobody ever said curry was better than Durant...where does the.Op get this from?

There are multiple people on this board that believe it. It’s retarded yes but they believe it nonetheless

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:48 am

Ali Natural wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:Nobody ever said curry was better than Durant...where does the.Op get this from?

There are multiple people on this board that believe it. It’s retarded yes but they believe it nonetheless

There's a lot of retarded people on this board

Dagger · Post by **Dagger** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:57 am

What does this series prove to the contrary? Do you think the Warriors would be in a better position right now with KD and no Curry over the last month?

rtiff68 · Post by **rtiff68** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 12:41 pm

-Since 2015, the Warriors are 23-22 when Curry doesn't play (Durant joined the team in 2017).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, they are 24-1 in regular season games where Durant sits and Curry plays.
-In playoff games, they are 6-3 (7-3 if you count the game against Houston where Durant got injured and Curry took over in the 4th quarter).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, Curry, Thompson, Durant, and Green have played 1,921 minutes together. During that span they are...

+16.9 per 100 possessions with all 4 on the floor (which is insane)
+14.8 with Curry, Thompson, and Green (sans Durant: 672 minutes)
+13.9 with Curry and Green (sans Durant and Thompson: 526 minutes)
+14.3 with Curry (sans Durant, Green, and Thompson: 216 minutes)
+4.9 with Durant, Green, and Thompson (sans Curry: 591 minutes)
-.5 with Durant (sans Curry, Green, and Thompson: 417 minutes)
-4.3 with Thompson (sans Curry, Durant, and Green: 402 minutes)
-2.0 with Green (sans Durant, Curry, and Thompson: 209 minutes)

Draw your own conclusions.

LNS · Post by **LNS** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:05 pm

rtiff68 wrote:-Since 2015, the Warriors are 23-22 when Curry doesn't play (Durant joined the team in 2017).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, they are 24-1 in regular season games where Durant sits and Curry plays.
-In playoff games, they are 6-3 (7-3 if you count the game against Houston where Durant got injured and Curry took over in the 4th quarter).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, Curry, Thompson, Durant, and Green have played 1,921 minutes together. During that span they are...

+16.9 per 100 possessions with all 4 on the floor (which is insane)
+14.8 with Curry, Thompson, and Green (sans Durant: 672 minutes)
+13.9 with Curry and Green (sans Durant and Thompson: 526 minutes)
+14.3 with Curry (sans Durant, Green, and Thompson: 216 minutes)
+4.9 with Durant, Green, and Thompson (sans Curry: 591 minutes)
-.5 with Durant (sans Curry, Green, and Thompson: 417 minutes)
-4.3 with Thompson (sans Curry, Durant, and Green: 402 minutes)
-2.0 with Green (sans Durant, Curry, and Thompson: 209 minutes)

Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusion is that they’re currently losing 3-1 without him in the Finals.

:ohshitgif:

rtiff68 · Post by **rtiff68** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:13 pm

LNS wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:-Since 2015, the Warriors are 23-22 when Curry doesn't play (Durant joined the team in 2017).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, they are 24-1 in regular season games where Durant sits and Curry plays.
-In playoff games, they are 6-3 (7-3 if you count the game against Houston where Durant got injured and Curry took over in the 4th quarter).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, Curry, Thompson, Durant, and Green have played 1,921 minutes together. During that span they are...

+16.9 per 100 possessions with all 4 on the floor (which is insane)
+14.8 with Curry, Thompson, and Green (sans Durant: 672 minutes)
+13.9 with Curry and Green (sans Durant and Thompson: 526 minutes)
+14.3 with Curry (sans Durant, Green, and Thompson: 216 minutes)
+4.9 with Durant, Green, and Thompson (sans Curry: 591 minutes)
-.5 with Durant (sans Curry, Green, and Thompson: 417 minutes)
-4.3 with Thompson (sans Curry, Durant, and Green: 402 minutes)
-2.0 with Green (sans Durant, Curry, and Thompson: 209 minutes)

Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusion is that they’re currently losing 3-1 without him in the Finals.

That's about the level of sophistication that I expected-- my response punched the OP square in the nuts.

They had a great run. I only remember the '88 and '89 Super Bowls for the 49ers, and even though the Giants won 3 titles in 5 years, they were never a juggernaut and/or dynasty (they didn't even make the playoffs in '11 and '13, and were the wildcard in '10 and '14), so this was the most dynastic/dominant run I've witnessed by one of my favorite teams.

It would have been nice to get one more, but It was still pretty awesome...

LNS · Post by **LNS** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:15 pm

rtiff68 wrote:
LNS wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:-Since 2015, the Warriors are 23-22 when Curry doesn't play (Durant joined the team in 2017).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, they are 24-1 in regular season games where Durant sits and Curry plays.
-In playoff games, they are 6-3 (7-3 if you count the game against Houston where Durant got injured and Curry took over in the 4th quarter).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, Curry, Thompson, Durant, and Green have played 1,921 minutes together. During that span they are...

+16.9 per 100 possessions with all 4 on the floor (which is insane)
+14.8 with Curry, Thompson, and Green (sans Durant: 672 minutes)
+13.9 with Curry and Green (sans Durant and Thompson: 526 minutes)
+14.3 with Curry (sans Durant, Green, and Thompson: 216 minutes)
+4.9 with Durant, Green, and Thompson (sans Curry: 591 minutes)
-.5 with Durant (sans Curry, Green, and Thompson: 417 minutes)
-4.3 with Thompson (sans Curry, Durant, and Green: 402 minutes)
-2.0 with Green (sans Durant, Curry, and Thompson: 209 minutes)

Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusion is that they’re currently losing 3-1 without him in the Finals.

That's about the level of sophistication that I expected-- my response punched the OP square in the nuts.

They had a great run. I only remember the '88 and '89 Super Bowls for the 49ers, and even though the Giants won 3 titles in 5 years, they were never a juggernaut and/or dynasty (they didn't even make the playoffs in '11 and '13, and were the wildcard in '10 and '14), so this was the most dynastic/dominant run I've witnessed by one of my favorite teams.

It would have been nice to get one more, but It was still pretty awesome...

Drown those sorrows, pal.

:haha2:

Bartman · Post by **Bartman** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:28 pm

Rtiff showed his face with GS in dire straits, that takes major balls.

I like that he kicked LNS in the nuts in the process...LOL

GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Warriors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hope they can extend the series and pull out the miracle.

Welcome back Rtiff.

PhutureDynasty · Post by **PhutureDynasty** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:53 pm

rtiff68 wrote:-Since 2015, the Warriors are 23-22 when Curry doesn't play (Durant joined the team in 2017).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, they are 24-1 in regular season games where Durant sits and Curry plays.
-In playoff games, they are 6-3 (7-3 if you count the game against Houston where Durant got injured and Curry took over in the 4th quarter).

-Since Durant joined the Warriors, Curry, Thompson, Durant, and Green have played 1,921 minutes together. During that span they are...

+16.9 per 100 possessions with all 4 on the floor (which is insane)
+14.8 with Curry, Thompson, and Green (sans Durant: 672 minutes)
+13.9 with Curry and Green (sans Durant and Thompson: 526 minutes)
+14.3 with Curry (sans Durant, Green, and Thompson: 216 minutes)
+4.9 with Durant, Green, and Thompson (sans Curry: 591 minutes)
-.5 with Durant (sans Curry, Green, and Thompson: 417 minutes)
-4.3 with Thompson (sans Curry, Durant, and Green: 402 minutes)
-2.0 with Green (sans Durant, Curry, and Thompson: 209 minutes)

Draw your own conclusions.

You can say what you want about advanced analytics or "Blog Boys" as KD calls them, but in this situation that does say something.

I believe KD is the superior basketball player for the record, but for the Warriors Curry is more valuable in their schematic style.

Yes, KD got the 2 FMVPs when they beat the Cavs but that doesn't tell the entire story.

elmerjfudd · Post by **elmerjfudd** » Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:45 pm

My only argument is when both are on the floor who's the better player.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

AngerGeneral

I was told Curry > Durant

I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant

Re: I was told Curry > Durant