What "logic"? Clevey claimed LeChump played with bums, I posted their 2009 and 2010 ranks to show they were far from bums.Max. wrote:Based on TDK's logic, LeBron overachieved this year by beating the higher seeded Celtics.
All Hail King James!
Let's compare those Cavs to Jordan's 89 and 90 Bulls, just for shits and giggles:
2009 Cavs vs. 1989 Bulls
#1 Seed / 66 wins vs. #6 seed / 47-wins
Best record in NBA vs. 9th best record in NBA
#4 in Offense vs. #12 in Offense
#3 in Defense vs. #11 in Defense
#2 in 3-PTFG% vs. #4 in FG%
Lost in the ECF to a LOWER seed vs. lost in ECF to the #1 seed / eventual NBA Champions
2010 Cavs vs. 1990 Bulls
#1 seed / 61 wins vs. #3 seed / 55 wins
Best record in NBA (tie) vs. 5th best record in NBA
#6 in Offense vs. 5th in Offense
#7 in Defense vs. 19th in Defense
#2 in 3PTFG% vs. #3 in FG%
Lost in the Semi's to a LOWER seed vs. lost in ECF to the #1 seed / eventual NBA Champions
Conclusion:
1) LeChump had the same OR better level of talent around him, relative to the respective league competition at the time
2) LeChump failed to make that talent better because (by his own admission) he wasn't good enough to be "the man" every night
3) Jordan embraced the challenge of competition, and through hard-work, dedication and effort he led his Bulls to the Championship the next season (91) while LeBron ran like a bitch to AVOID competition, and collude with other superstars to form a Super Team
Discuss why these facts will undoubtedly upset many AG posters.