...and you're an idiot, so there's that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:That makes it considerably less risky, but its still at best a marginal signing. He's not that good and he doesn't fit.gaskill15 wrote:The 2nd year is a team option.vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Apparently the Sacramento Kings. Dumb and Dumber outbidding themselves for Lavine and Parker. So much for having tons of cap space next summer.
Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
-
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 44485
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Well congratulations on the brilliant retort! I wonder why the completely inept Kings were the only team showing interest? Even Milwaukee had little interest, choosing Ilyasova over him.thedangerouskitchen wrote:...and you're an idiot, so there's that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:That makes it considerably less risky, but its still at best a marginal signing. He's not that good and he doesn't fit.gaskill15 wrote:
The 2nd year is a team option.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
The drunk thinks overpaying for an injured player was a smart move?
-
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 44485
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
It's an accurate retort, idiot... you claiming he's "not that good and doesn't fit" proves it.vcsgrizzfan wrote:Well congratulations on the brilliant retort! I wonder why the completely inept Kings were the only team showing interest? Even Milwaukee had little interest, choosing Ilyasova over him.thedangerouskitchen wrote:...and you're an idiot, so there's that.vcsgrizzfan wrote:
That makes it considerably less risky, but its still at best a marginal signing. He's not that good and he doesn't fit.
Last edited by thedangerouskitchen on Sat Jul 14, 2018 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
-
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 44485
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
$20 mil in today's market for a 23-year old with Parker's talent is most certainly worth rolling the dice for 1-year, mama's boy.LNS wrote:The drunk thinks overpaying for an injured player was a smart move?
If he doesn't work out he's gone, and the Bulls will STILL have $45+ mil in cap space for next season's FA crop... your Lakers, on the other hand, are trapped in no-mans-land after paying $153 mil to a middle-aged man who is going to stunt the development of the youngsters AND leave your Lakers back in the cellar when he retires.
Enjoy..!!
Last edited by thedangerouskitchen on Sat Jul 14, 2018 6:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's an accurate retort, idiot... you claiming he's "not that good and doesn't fit" proves it.vcsgrizzfan wrote:Well congratulations on the brilliant retort! I wonder why the completely inept Kings were the only team showing interest? Even Milwaukee had little interest, choosing Ilyasova over him.thedangerouskitchen wrote:
...and you're an idiot, so there's that.
- vcsgrizzfan
- Mount Rushmore
- Posts: 38747
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Another brilliant retort! Go for the trifecta!thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's an accurate retort, idiot... you claiming he's "not that good and doesn't fit" proves it.vcsgrizzfan wrote:Well congratulations on the brilliant retort! I wonder why the completely inept Kings were the only team showing interest? Even Milwaukee had little interest, choosing Ilyasova over him.thedangerouskitchen wrote:
...and you're an idiot, so there's that.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Not gonna lie, I like the Bulls young core.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
[quote="elmerjfudd"]Who were they bidding against, where they thought they had to pay him that much?
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk[/quote
Second year is a team option. The deal is fine.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk[/quote
Second year is a team option. The deal is fine.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
thedangerouskitchen wrote: at TDK's bitches acting like this was a bad signing YET thinking it was "smart" to give Mike Conley $153 mil to "lead" the Grizzlies to the second WORST record in the league (ROFL), and a "no-brainer" for the Lakers to throw 5-years of rebuilding down the toilet to sign a 34-year old to $153 mil so he can lead his team into no-mans-land for the next 4 years.
...and you idiots wonder why TDK enjoys slapping you around so often.
Anyway, back to Parker... it's a signing that is absolutely worth the risk because if he's fully recovered Parker has elite Scoring ability (and still only 23 years old), and if he doesn't work out the Bulls simply don't pick up the second-year option... unlike the Grizz and Lakers, who will be stuck-in-mud with Conley and LeChump for yearS!
Conley played like 7 games last year
-
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 44485
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Again, it's the only retort I need.vcsgrizzfan wrote:Another brilliant retort! Go for the trifecta!thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's an accurate retort, idiot... you claiming he's "not that good and doesn't fit" proves it.vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Well congratulations on the brilliant retort! I wonder why the completely inept Kings were the only team showing interest? Even Milwaukee had little interest, choosing Ilyasova over him.
Get mad.
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
-
- G.O.A.T.
- Posts: 44485
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Precisely why idiots like grizz have no business ripping on the Bulls for signing Parker.3effs wrote:thedangerouskitchen wrote: at TDK's bitches acting like this was a bad signing YET thinking it was "smart" to give Mike Conley $153 mil to "lead" the Grizzlies to the second WORST record in the league (ROFL), and a "no-brainer" for the Lakers to throw 5-years of rebuilding down the toilet to sign a 34-year old to $153 mil so he can lead his team into no-mans-land for the next 4 years.
...and you idiots wonder why TDK enjoys slapping you around so often.
Anyway, back to Parker... it's a signing that is absolutely worth the risk because if he's fully recovered Parker has elite Scoring ability (and still only 23 years old), and if he doesn't work out the Bulls simply don't pick up the second-year option... unlike the Grizz and Lakers, who will be stuck-in-mud with Conley and LeChump for yearS!
Conley played like 7 games last year
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
thedangerouskitchen wrote:$20 mil in today's market for a 23-year old with Parker's talent is most certainly worth rolling the dice for 1-year, mama's boy.LNS wrote:The drunk thinks overpaying for an injured player was a smart move?
If he doesn't work out he's gone, and the Bulls will STILL have $45+ mil in cap space for next season's FA crop... your Lakers, on the other hand, are trapped in no-mans-land after paying $153 mil to a middle-aged man who is going to stunt the development of the youngsters AND leave your Lakers back in the cellar when he retires.
Enjoy..!!
You’re so fucking triggered lol
It’s a shit signing and your drunk ass knows it.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
I don't see how you can criticize this move given year 2 is an option which preserves our $40 million in cap space for 2019. Either that $20 million was going to be paid to Melo as a buyout, distributed amongst the roster if no one was signed, or pay Jabari for 1 year.
Jabari was the best option easily.
Jabari was the best option easily.
- Bush4Ever35
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:37 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
To me it's a more of a "it doesn't really matter" move than an outright blunder.
I think most people in this thread know how this one is likely to play out.
I think most people in this thread know how this one is likely to play out.
- LeBronMonsterDunk
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 54925
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:19 am
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
You're right.Bush4Ever35 wrote:To me it's a more of a "it doesn't really matter" move than an outright blunder.
I think most people in this thread know how this one is likely to play out.
This is a "We will put trash on the floor because the dummies in Chicago will continue to buy tickets" move.
You never liked me, probably don't like me still, but a ***** liking me aint never paid my bills
- Bush4Ever35
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:37 pm
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
The future is certain bleak in Chicago.LeBronMonsterDunk wrote:
You're right.
This is a "We will put trash on the floor because the dummies in Chicago will continue to buy tickets" move.
- kobeunderbite
- Proud supporter of President Trump.
- Posts: 56656
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:03 pm
- Location: http://oi58.tinypic.com/1zx7f55.jpg
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
This is one of the worst deals I've seen the Bulls make in years.
Re: Jabari Parker to Bulls 2 yr/$40 million
Very promising3effs wrote:Not gonna lie, I like the Bulls young core.