Apples to oranges. The subprime mortgage crisis leading to economic recession is a vastly different situation than Obama saying “I can’t do anything about bringing jobs back”, him leaving office, being replaced by a guy who says “I CAN do something about bringing jobs back”, and jobs coming back because said replacement is doing something about it. Keep reaching. Keep losing.Shill Jackson wrote:So......seven years after Clinton was out of office it was still Clinton's doing?Kobeunderbite wrote:Shill Jackson wrote: Wasn't the GOP in control when the economy had the worst downturn since the Great Depression?
Wasn't it the GOP who repeatedly blocked any attempt to take action after they authored that massive economic fuck up?
It was actually Bill "Pervert" Clinton who orchestrated the subprime crisis. But I'm no GWBush fan either, that guy is an idiot as well. The reason we're seeing real recovery now is because there is neither a PERVERT demopedo in the White House nor a puppet Republicuck. There's Trump.
But less than a year out of office and still his budget, it's not Obama's doing?
and there's not a pervert in the White House?
Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
- paskeezy3000
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:31 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
#1 Kareem
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
- manchild98
- Hidden Member
- Posts: 14222
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:05 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
If you were out of work for any length of time over the past 5 years you just don't have skills anyone wants...or you're just a terrible interview.
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
Am I looking at this wrong? Cause it has been trending down ward since 2010.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
- paskeezy3000
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:31 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
That’s just not true.manchild98 wrote:If you were out of work for any length of time over the past 5 years you just don't have skills anyone wants...or you're just a terrible interview.
#1 Kareem
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
- paskeezy3000
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:31 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
This was already discussed ITT. Bullshit numbers pushed by Obama where losing a career and picking up two part time jobs is considered a net gain.Macrotus wrote:Am I looking at this wrong? Cause it has been trending down ward since 2010.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
#1 Kareem
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
so the chart is bullshiting 2017 unemployment rate also?paskeezy3000 wrote:This was already discussed ITT. Bullshit numbers pushed by Obama where losing a career and picking up two part time jobs is considered a net gain.Macrotus wrote:Am I looking at this wrong? Cause it has been trending down ward since 2010.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
- paskeezy3000
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:31 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
Sure. Obama was a great job creator. His philosophy of “tax them till they die” will be taught in the most prestigious business schools for the next 100 years.Macrotus wrote:so the chart is bullshiting 2017 unemployment rate also?paskeezy3000 wrote:This was already discussed ITT. Bullshit numbers pushed by Obama where losing a career and picking up two part time jobs is considered a net gain.Macrotus wrote:Am I looking at this wrong? Cause it has been trending down ward since 2010.
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
#1 Kareem
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
manchild98 wrote:If you were out of work for any length of time over the past 5 years you just don't have skills anyone wants...or you're just a terrible interview.
Basically
So arty...
These users thanked the author Chooch for the post:
Da Stars.
Rating: 3.85%
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
so this thread is pointless...all bullshitting.paskeezy3000 wrote:Sure. Obama was a great job creator. His philosophy of “tax them till they die” will be taught in the most prestigious business schools for the next 100 years.Macrotus wrote:so the chart is bullshiting 2017 unemployment rate also?paskeezy3000 wrote: This was already discussed ITT. Bullshit numbers pushed by Obama where losing a career and picking up two part time jobs is considered a net gain.
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
Sad to see so many people upset about their fellow Americans doing well. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a terrible sickness.
- kobeunderbite
- Proud supporter of President Trump.
- Posts: 56666
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:03 pm
- Location: http://oi58.tinypic.com/1zx7f55.jpg
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
ripper76 wrote:Sad to see so many people upset about their fellow Americans doing well. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a terrible sickness.
It really is sad. They want America to burn.
- AbeVigodaLive
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55963
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:21 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
paskeezy3000 wrote:I usually agree but as far as unemployment and job growth there is no question that President Trump is having a positive impact. He’s creating an environment here in the United States that’s giving businesses a chance to not only survive but flourish. Companies that were fleeing the country for their lives by the thousands are now coming back. They’re able to come back because they’re not being taxed into oblivion. They’re not being taxed into oblivion because the man in charge is for America first and not a globalists scumbag like everyone else for the last 30+ years has been.AbeVigodaLive wrote:Good things happening?
- It's only because of the new guy if he's your guy.
- It's only because of the old guy if he was your guy.
Bad things happening?
- It's only because of the old guy if he wasn't your guy.
- It's only because of the new guy if he isn't your guy.
This is true for every issue. Ever. Always. Without fail.
My commentary isn't about whether or not signs actually point to an actual correct answer or not.
It's about how "we" respond to this development regardless of how obvious/obtuse the answer is...
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
I have duds on here shook. I rarely talk politics but I am always tagged or talked about in these political threads or posts.
this coming from a man that said basically very little about these affairs even the election.
this shows I have wrecked many posters on here.
Once more, politics is all trivial but go ahead and "fight over longshanks scraps"
You guys are a sad comedy show.
this coming from a man that said basically very little about these affairs even the election.
this shows I have wrecked many posters on here.
Once more, politics is all trivial but go ahead and "fight over longshanks scraps"
You guys are a sad comedy show.
- paskeezy3000
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9124
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:31 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
I understand your commentary. You only post stuff like this when someone says something positive about Mr Trump though. This fact is telling.AbeVigodaLive wrote:paskeezy3000 wrote:I usually agree but as far as unemployment and job growth there is no question that President Trump is having a positive impact. He’s creating an environment here in the United States that’s giving businesses a chance to not only survive but flourish. Companies that were fleeing the country for their lives by the thousands are now coming back. They’re able to come back because they’re not being taxed into oblivion. They’re not being taxed into oblivion because the man in charge is for America first and not a globalists scumbag like everyone else for the last 30+ years has been.AbeVigodaLive wrote:Good things happening?
- It's only because of the new guy if he's your guy.
- It's only because of the old guy if he was your guy.
Bad things happening?
- It's only because of the old guy if he wasn't your guy.
- It's only because of the new guy if he isn't your guy.
This is true for every issue. Ever. Always. Without fail.
My commentary isn't about whether or not signs actually point to an actual correct answer or not.
It's about how "we" respond to this development regardless of how obvious/obtuse the answer is...
#1 Kareem
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
#2 Karl
#3 Kobe
- lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 58347
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
paskeezy3000 wrote:I understand your commentary. You only post stuff like this when someone says something positive about Mr Trump though. This fact is telling.AbeVigodaLive wrote:paskeezy3000 wrote: I usually agree but as far as unemployment and job growth there is no question that President Trump is having a positive impact. He’s creating an environment here in the United States that’s giving businesses a chance to not only survive but flourish. Companies that were fleeing the country for their lives by the thousands are now coming back. They’re able to come back because they’re not being taxed into oblivion. They’re not being taxed into oblivion because the man in charge is for America first and not a globalists scumbag like everyone else for the last 30+ years has been.
My commentary isn't about whether or not signs actually point to an actual correct answer or not.
It's about how "we" respond to this development regardless of how obvious/obtuse the answer is...
So basically what you're saying is, Trump's triumphs trigger him?
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
who in here is disappointed in the low unemployment rate?
- lettherebehouse
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 58347
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
Macrotus wrote:who in here is disappointed in the low unemployment rate?
Saboteur
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
I don't see him in this thread.lettherebehouse wrote:Macrotus wrote:who in here is disappointed in the low unemployment rate?
Saboteur
- AbeVigodaLive
- Clean-Up Crew
- Posts: 55963
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:21 pm
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
paskeezy3000 wrote:I understand your commentary. You only post stuff like this when someone says something positive about Mr Trump though. This fact is telling.AbeVigodaLive wrote:paskeezy3000 wrote: I usually agree but as far as unemployment and job growth there is no question that President Trump is having a positive impact. He’s creating an environment here in the United States that’s giving businesses a chance to not only survive but flourish. Companies that were fleeing the country for their lives by the thousands are now coming back. They’re able to come back because they’re not being taxed into oblivion. They’re not being taxed into oblivion because the man in charge is for America first and not a globalists scumbag like everyone else for the last 30+ years has been.
My commentary isn't about whether or not signs actually point to an actual correct answer or not.
It's about how "we" respond to this development regardless of how obvious/obtuse the answer is...
That's categorically false.
- kobeunderbite
- Proud supporter of President Trump.
- Posts: 56666
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:03 pm
- Location: http://oi58.tinypic.com/1zx7f55.jpg
Re: Lowest unemployment rate since 2000
paskeezy3000 wrote:I understand your commentary. You only post stuff like this when someone says something positive about Mr Trump though. This fact is telling.AbeVigodaLive wrote:paskeezy3000 wrote: I usually agree but as far as unemployment and job growth there is no question that President Trump is having a positive impact. He’s creating an environment here in the United States that’s giving businesses a chance to not only survive but flourish. Companies that were fleeing the country for their lives by the thousands are now coming back. They’re able to come back because they’re not being taxed into oblivion. They’re not being taxed into oblivion because the man in charge is for America first and not a globalists scumbag like everyone else for the last 30+ years has been.
My commentary isn't about whether or not signs actually point to an actual correct answer or not.
It's about how "we" respond to this development regardless of how obvious/obtuse the answer is...