LeBron homers owned

Talk about anything here.
Post Reply
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155082
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:If that's real clip, it's whatever.

No matter how you rank Jordan vs. Lebron, Jordan absolutely does not have a kill on par with the 2016 Warriors.

Not even close.
He has more.
Magic, Lakers, Pistons, Knicks, Sonics etc...would all be considered super teams in today's era...warriors would not be considered super teams...they had curry, Klay and green....hmmmm that's not much compared to Jordan's competition
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 14682
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

Deez wrote:
Stick to MMA talk
Do you actually have a substantive response?

We saw Pippen struggle to stop some noticeably worse offensive players in observable reality.

Durant is a top 5 scorer all-time.

It's not a sin to suggest Pippen would greatly struggle against him if they put him on an island with no help.
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 14682
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

elartman1973 wrote:
He has more.
Magic, Lakers, Pistons, Knicks, Sonics etc...would all be considered super teams in today's era...warriors would not be considered super teams...they had curry, Klay and green....hmmmm that's not much compared to Jordan's competition
Too obvious.

Be more subtle and less fat.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 43930
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
Bush4Ever. wrote:
Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.

He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
Lol, ok
You're making a fool of yourself Deez. Pippen was a great wing defender. No one disputes that. But he wasn't some God. And he never faced someone with the skill set Durant possesses. The Warriors just had too many weapons at their peak.

The bigger problem for the Bulls is just having to defend 30 feet in, instead of 15-18. The Warriors can spread you out and then put it on the floor and finish when you try to defend them out. The Bulls couldn't do that. Their 3 point shooting was generally poor and definitely poor off the dribble. It relied on spot up and was still not remotely close to what the Warriors can do to you.
Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
User avatar
Havlicekstealsit
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 46814
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Havlicekstealsit »

elartman1973 wrote:
CleveTown™ wrote:Jordan reminds me of Sportswise. So easily triggered and trollable.

And what did he raise his eyebrows up for when GOAT mentioned he beat the greatest team of all time?

He did.

And had the Warriors played in MJ's era they would have run the season. 82-0.
1995 magic had the best offense of all time at a 115.5 rating
Warriors have passed that mark twice the last 4 years.
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155082
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
Deez wrote:
Pippen defends as good as anyone ever and he would slow down Durant.
Pippen would get molested by Durant in single-coverage situations.

He has zero chance at meaningfully stopping Durant 1v1.
Delusional as.fuck.
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Lol, ok
You're making a fool of yourself Deez. Pippen was a great wing defender. No one disputes that. But he wasn't some God. And he never faced someone with the skill set Durant possesses. The Warriors just had too many weapons at their peak.

The bigger problem for the Bulls is just having to defend 30 feet in, instead of 15-18. The Warriors can spread you out and then put it on the floor and finish when you try to defend them out. The Bulls couldn't do that. Their 3 point shooting was generally poor and definitely poor off the dribble. It relied on spot up and was still not remotely close to what the Warriors can do to you.
Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 14682
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

Deez wrote:
Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
So why didn't he "slow down" Penny?

Or young Kobe?

Again, this isn't hypothetical. This is something we observed directly.

Saying Pippen could meaningful disrupt Durant 1v1 while getting handled by Penny is like saying a dude can get 9s and 10s when you observe them struggling to get 6s....it just doesn't make any type of logical sense.
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 14682
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

elartman1973 wrote:
Delusional as.fuck.
Still fat.
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155082
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:
He has more.
Magic, Lakers, Pistons, Knicks, Sonics etc...would all be considered super teams in today's era...warriors would not be considered super teams...they had curry, Klay and green....hmmmm that's not much compared to Jordan's competition
Too obvious.

Be more subtle and less fat.
Grow up and admit you are wrong...those warriors teams would get trampled by the bulls
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155082
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:
Delusional as.fuck.
Still fat.
Your deflections only prove me right
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

elartman1973 wrote:
Bush4Ever. wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:
He has more.
Magic, Lakers, Pistons, Knicks, Sonics etc...would all be considered super teams in today's era...warriors would not be considered super teams...they had curry, Klay and green....hmmmm that's not much compared to Jordan's competition
Too obvious.

Be more subtle and less fat.
Grow up and admit you are wrong...those warriors teams would get trampled by the bulls

The adults are talking in this thread Artie. Find a different thread to make an ass of yourself in.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 43930
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
You're making a fool of yourself Deez. Pippen was a great wing defender. No one disputes that. But he wasn't some God. And he never faced someone with the skill set Durant possesses. The Warriors just had too many weapons at their peak.

The bigger problem for the Bulls is just having to defend 30 feet in, instead of 15-18. The Warriors can spread you out and then put it on the floor and finish when you try to defend them out. The Bulls couldn't do that. Their 3 point shooting was generally poor and definitely poor off the dribble. It relied on spot up and was still not remotely close to what the Warriors can do to you.
Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 43930
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
Deez wrote:
Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
So why didn't he "slow down" Penny?

Or young Kobe?

Again, this isn't hypothetical. This is something we observed directly.

Saying Pippen could meaningful disrupt Durant 1v1 while getting handled by Penny is like saying a dude can get 9s and 10s when you observe them struggling to get 6s....it just doesn't make any type of logical sense.
Durant would get his but he would get slowed down more than he has.
User avatar
gaskill15
You go, we go... forever
Posts: 30713
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:58 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by gaskill15 »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Shit just got real!

:mikebrown:
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Empirical evidence says otherwise. I'll go with that. I know you'd love to suck MJ's cock Deez, and have Pippen give you a facial, but that doesn't change the fact those teams were built to succeed in the 90s against the likes of the slothful Knicks and would get their shit pushed in by the Warriors. Cheers.
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Empirical evidence says otherwise. I'll go with that. I know you'd love to suck MJ's cock Deez, and have Pippen give you a facial, but that doesn't change the fact those teams were built to succeed in the 90s against the likes of the slothful Knicks and would get their shit pushed in by the Warriors. Cheers.
Is this one real enough for you gaskill? :suds: :D
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 14682
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

elartman1973 wrote:
Grow up and admit you are wrong...those warriors teams would get trampled by the bulls
Repeating your thesis isn't an argument.
User avatar
lettherebehouse
Clean-Up Crew
Posts: 58368
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:06 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by lettherebehouse »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Sorry but you guys are morons if you don’t think Pippen would slow Durant down. That’s flat out a laughing joke. Troll along
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them


zOWNED!


:slapping:
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 43930
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
No Deez. You're the moron. Again. Nobody said he wouldn't "slow" him down, however you define that. But Durant is getting his. Period. And the Warriors are making almost as many field goals as the Bulls, but half of them are 3s. Not a good recipe for the Bulls.
No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Empirical evidence says otherwise. I'll go with that. I know you'd love to suck MJ's cock Deez, and have Pippen give you a facial, but that doesn't change the fact those teams were built to succeed in the 90s against the likes of the slothful Knicks and would get their shit pushed in by the Warriors. Cheers.
blah blah blah, all depends once again which era. Golden state is playing in a chuck era, it would be different if they played back then but we won’t ever know. Leave it at that
Post Reply