LeBron homers owned

Talk about anything here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

bulls419 wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Empirical evidence says otherwise. I'll go with that. I know you'd love to suck MJ's cock Deez, and have Pippen give you a facial, but that doesn't change the fact those teams were built to succeed in the 90s against the likes of the slothful Knicks and would get their shit pushed in by the Warriors. Cheers.
Grizz, please list "empirical evidence" that says otherwise. Before listing, google the definition of empirical evidence.
Id you haven’t learned yet, Grizz can say anything and it trumps anything anybody else says.
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155458
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
Deez wrote:Bush, if you are gonna troll don’t make it so damn obvious, Jordan is still top 5? Lmao. Yeah as in #1 but I’m sure you know that
If you think he's the GOAT, he's obviously Top 5. I'm simply taking a conservative approach, and including the opinions of more intelligent and reasonable analysts when I say "top 5".
elartman1973 wrote:
Every team.back then had to pay thier dues..in this era they just collude and that part of the process is.eliminated and the winning is so less worthy or impressive
Jordan landed zero punches on the uber teams of his era. Nothing but failure after failure.

Lebron landed one big haymaker KO on his.

That's the difference. And it's objectively correct and beyond debate.
LeBron barely beat an injured warriors team without KD...that team would get owned in the 90s...and.jordan had to overcome the Celtics and Lakers and Pistons...and those suns and magic and Sonics..all.would be considered super teams in Lebrons era
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 15089
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

Deez wrote:
It’s far from irrelevant. If he’s not favored against those celtics than why even act like it matters?
Okay.

So Lebron receives no discredit for any Finals except the 2011 Finals, correct?

That was the only Finals he lost where he was favored.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
Deez wrote:
It’s far from irrelevant. If he’s not favored against those celtics than why even act like it matters?
Okay.

So Lebron receives no discredit for any Finals except the 2011 Finals, correct?

That was the only Finals he lost where he was favored.
Heat weren’t favored any other time but that one finals? Surprising. How many favored playoff series did Lebron lose and Jordan lose?
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 15089
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

elartman1973 wrote:
jordan had to overcome the Celtics and Lakers and Pistons...and those suns and magic and Sonics..all.would be considered super teams in Lebrons era
Jordan got emasculated against the Celtics. Six straight losses.
Jordan never faced the Showtime Lakers.
Jordan ended his career 1-3 against the Bad Boy Pistons in the playoffs (series).

1-5 in playoff series against the Celtics and Pistons, and a NA against the Showtime Lakers.

Wow...what a giant-slayer.

Wait until the giants get crippled and die of old age, and then sneak into the castle.

:lol:
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

bulls419 wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: No you definitely are being a moron, I literally just text some guys about the responses I’ve read in here and 2 of them were coached and they even laughed and said you guys obviously don’t know shit. I agree with them
Empirical evidence says otherwise. I'll go with that. I know you'd love to suck MJ's cock Deez, and have Pippen give you a facial, but that doesn't change the fact those teams were built to succeed in the 90s against the likes of the slothful Knicks and would get their shit pushed in by the Warriors. Cheers.
Grizz, please list "empirical evidence" that says otherwise. Before listing, google the definition of empirical evidence.
Are you being obtuse on purpose? The 3 was barely part of the game, mostly on spot ups and the vast majority of the game was played within 18 feet of the basket. Shot tracking data is available. Look it up.
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155458
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:
jordan had to overcome the Celtics and Lakers and Pistons...and those suns and magic and Sonics..all.would be considered super teams in Lebrons era
Jordan got emasculated against the Celtics. Six straight losses.
Jordan never faced the Showtime Lakers.
Jordan ended his career 1-3 against the Bad Boy Pistons in the playoffs (series).

1-5 in playoff series against the Celtics and Pistons, and a NA against the Showtime Lakers.

Wow...what a giant-slayer.

Wait until the giants get crippled and die of old age, and then sneak into the castle.

:lol:
Jordan overcame all those teams..that's what the real NBA is about..not about colluding and not having any obstacles...overcoming obstacle makes.Jordan ten times the player lebron is....and don't even bring up fluke 2016...
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 15089
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

Deez wrote:
Heat weren’t favored any other time but that one finals? Surprising. How many favored playoff series did Lebron lose and Jordan lose?
2011 is the only Finals Lebron lost while favored.

The Heat were actually underdogs in 2012 against the Thunder (barely), and favorites in 2013, and then very slight underdogs against the Spurs in 2014 (although the Spurs won in a way that the odds would not have suggested).

Obviously, the Cavs were underdogs each time out against the Warriors.
User avatar
Bush4Ever.
All-Time Great
Posts: 15089
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:37 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bush4Ever. »

elartman1973 wrote:
Jordan overcame all those teams.
No, he literally didn't.

He didn't beat the Celtics at all. He didn't even face the "real" Showtime Lakers in the first place.

He beat the Pistons one time out of four, when Detroit had meaningfully declined (going from a title to 50 wins and the 9th best SRS in the league).

To his credit, he ruled the dead and giantless NBA with a strong hand. But you don't need to rewrite history.

When the giants roamed the NBA, Jordan didn't do shit. Again, that's a factual matter. Not an opinion.
User avatar
elartman1973
El Padrino
Posts: 155458
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:25 pm
Location: O 'Town, Floradizzle

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by elartman1973 »

Bush4Ever. wrote:
elartman1973 wrote:
Jordan overcame all those teams.
No, he literally didn't.

He didn't beat the Celtics at all. He didn't even face the "real" Showtime Lakers in the first place.

He beat the Pistons one time out of four, when Detroit had meaningfully declined (going from a title to 50 wins and the 9th best SRS in the league).

To his credit, he ruled the dead and giantless NBA with a strong hand. But you don't need to rewrite history.

When the giants roamed the NBA, Jordan didn't do shit. Again, that's a factual matter. Not an opinion.
Lebrons beaten nobody valid and had his ass kicked for a looking time before having to collude and then still got his ass kicked by a mediocre team


Real spit
"I'm drivin Caddy, you fixin a FORD"

Image
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

LeBron shit the bed in 2011. No one can deny that with a straight face.

Jordan has no title wins against a team close to what LeBron won against in 2016. No one can deny that with a straight face.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:LeBron shit the bed in 2011. No one can deny that with a straight face.

Jordan has no title wins against a team close to what LeBron won against in 2016. No one can deny that with a straight face.
Cool but Jordan’s bulls would shit all over that cavs team.
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:LeBron shit the bed in 2011. No one can deny that with a straight face.

Jordan has no title wins against a team close to what LeBron won against in 2016. No one can deny that with a straight face.
Cool but Jordan’s bulls would shit all over that cavs team.
An assertion does not a fact make. Sorry bud. Jordan barely squeaked by some really mediocre Knick teams. You only want to remember what you want to remember wearing your rose colored glasses.

The league has changed and while the 1996 Bulls were built to succeed in 1996, they aren't built to succeed in today's NBA.

It's not a complex argument to follow.
User avatar
Bartman
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7942
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:22 pm

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Bartman »

Deez needs give up, he's getting killed ITT.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:LeBron shit the bed in 2011. No one can deny that with a straight face.

Jordan has no title wins against a team close to what LeBron won against in 2016. No one can deny that with a straight face.
Cool but Jordan’s bulls would shit all over that cavs team.
An assertion does not a fact make. Sorry bud. Jordan barely squeaked by some really mediocre Knick teams. You only want to remember what you want to remember wearing your rose colored glasses.

The league has changed and while the 1996 Bulls were built to succeed in 1996, they aren't built to succeed in today's NBA.

It's not a complex argument to follow.
Say what you want, you would be a huge idiot if you think those bulls don’t beat the Cavs. You aren’t that stupid, are you Grizz? You’d be laughing joke if you said otherwise to anyone who has watched or played the sport.
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Cool but Jordan’s bulls would shit all over that cavs team.
An assertion does not a fact make. Sorry bud. Jordan barely squeaked by some really mediocre Knick teams. You only want to remember what you want to remember wearing your rose colored glasses.

The league has changed and while the 1996 Bulls were built to succeed in 1996, they aren't built to succeed in today's NBA.

It's not a complex argument to follow.
Say what you want, you would be a huge idiot if you think those bulls don’t beat the Cavs. You aren’t that stupid, are you Grizz? You’d be laughing joke if you said otherwise to anyone who has watched or played the sport.
Shut up Deez. I just don't have the patience to deal with your low IQ tonight. Thanks.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
An assertion does not a fact make. Sorry bud. Jordan barely squeaked by some really mediocre Knick teams. You only want to remember what you want to remember wearing your rose colored glasses.

The league has changed and while the 1996 Bulls were built to succeed in 1996, they aren't built to succeed in today's NBA.

It's not a complex argument to follow.
Say what you want, you would be a huge idiot if you think those bulls don’t beat the Cavs. You aren’t that stupid, are you Grizz? You’d be laughing joke if you said otherwise to anyone who has watched or played the sport.
Shut up Deez. I just don't have the patience to deal with your low IQ tonight. Thanks.
You’re the idiot talking like a low IQ individual. Don’t be mad cause you’re too stupid to see something so obvious.
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Clinging to heroes is a strange human trait. Games evolve. Sports evolve. Why is admitting that so difficult?

Twenty years from now, the game and skills will have evolved in a direction we don't see yet. We didn't see the game as it is now 15 years ago AT ALL.

It is a natural process that shouldn't be hard to accept.
User avatar
vcsgrizzfan
Mount Rushmore
Posts: 38747
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:43 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by vcsgrizzfan »

Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote: Say what you want, you would be a huge idiot if you think those bulls don’t beat the Cavs. You aren’t that stupid, are you Grizz? You’d be laughing joke if you said otherwise to anyone who has watched or played the sport.
Shut up Deez. I just don't have the patience to deal with your low IQ tonight. Thanks.
You’re the idiot talking like a low IQ individual. Don’t be mad cause you’re too stupid to see something so obvious.
Sleep tight Deez.
User avatar
Deez
G.O.A.T.
Posts: 44077
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:32 am

Re: LeBron homers owned

Post by Deez »

vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Deez wrote:
vcsgrizzfan wrote:
Shut up Deez. I just don't have the patience to deal with your low IQ tonight. Thanks.
You’re the idiot talking like a low IQ individual. Don’t be mad cause you’re too stupid to see something so obvious.
Sleep tight Deez.
You too, try get your head out of the gutter before posting tomorrow.
Post Reply