some players quit when they are pressured to take their teams to 4 straight finals appearances, some players play through it because they know others rely on them. LeBron decides to play through it.
Now that the Heat have adjusted to his absence, expect them to win .800 of there games without him as they did in 2010-011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013:
lol at barely squeaking by the god-awful Celtics and Lakers equaling the "Heat adjusting to Wade's absence".
The Heat were 11-2 last season and 14-3 in 2011-12 without Wade. You are correct They are 7-6 this year without him...That's 32-11 if my math is correct...Do we look at the larger sample or the smaller sample and if we are manipulating samples they are .1000 without him in their last three games. I was taught in statistics that the larger your sample the more robust or accurate the inferences you make from that sample are.
I will be the bigger man and let you have the last word.
Now that the Heat have adjusted to his absence, expect them to win .800 of there games without him as they did in 2010-011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013:
lol at barely squeaking by the god-awful Celtics and Lakers equaling the "Heat adjusting to Wade's absence".
The Heat were 11-2 last season and 14-3 in 2011-12 without Wade. You are correct They are 7-6 this year without him...That's 32-11 if my math is correct...Do we look at the larger sample or the smaller sample and if we are manipulating samples they are .1000 without him in their last three games. I was taught in statistics that the larger your sample the more robust or accurate the inferences you make from that sample are.
I will be the bigger man and let you have the last word.
I'm guessing your teacher forget to mention that that logic only works when all things are equal... and the 2012 and 2013 Heat do not equal the 2014 Heat; therefore your point is moot and my point stands: The 2014 Heat are mediocre without Wade.
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
Now that the Heat have adjusted to his absence, expect them to win .800 of there games without him as they did in 2010-011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013:
lol at barely squeaking by the god-awful Celtics and Lakers equaling the "Heat adjusting to Wade's absence".
The Heat were 11-2 last season and 14-3 in 2011-12 without Wade. You are correct They are 7-6 this year without him...That's 32-11 if my math is correct...Do we look at the larger sample or the smaller sample and if we are manipulating samples they are .1000 without him in their last three games. I was taught in statistics that the larger your sample the more robust or accurate the inferences you make from that sample are.
I will be the bigger man and let you have the last word.
thedangerouskitchen wrote:
lol at barely squeaking by the god-awful Celtics and Lakers equaling the "Heat adjusting to Wade's absence".
The Heat were 11-2 last season and 14-3 in 2011-12 without Wade. You are correct They are 7-6 this year without him...That's 32-11 if my math is correct...Do we look at the larger sample or the smaller sample and if we are manipulating samples they are .1000 without him in their last three games. I was taught in statistics that the larger your sample the more robust or accurate the inferences you make from that sample are.
I will be the bigger man and let you have the last word.
I'm guessing your teacher forget to mention that that logic only works when all things are equal... and the 2012 and 2013 Heat do not equal the 2014 Heat; therefore your point is moot and my point stands: The 2014 Heat are mediocre without Wade.
thedangerouskitchen wrote:
lol at barely squeaking by the god-awful Celtics and Lakers equaling the "Heat adjusting to Wade's absence".
The Heat were 11-2 last season and 14-3 in 2011-12 without Wade. You are correct They are 7-6 this year without him...That's 32-11 if my math is correct...Do we look at the larger sample or the smaller sample and if we are manipulating samples they are .1000 without him in their last three games. I was taught in statistics that the larger your sample the more robust or accurate the inferences you make from that sample are.
I will be the bigger man and let you have the last word.
lol......Yea, IF all variables remained equal.
How would you make all the variables equal? The only constant is the absence or presence of one particular player. And I didn't know you were The Dangerous Kitchen as my post was directed toward him. That can not be rationally disputed, can it?
ROFL at the insecure LeTots bumping a thread 2 months old and bragging about the Heat barely squeaking by a bottom-feeder Cavs team playing withOut their -2- best players (Irving and Deng).
"Today's NBA is soft, the Defense is weak, and the rules 'really' favor the Offense."
"Lebron doesn’t guard for a full game and our game plan was to get him to play defense and he left me open all game."
thedangerouskitchen wrote:ROFL at the insecure LeTots bumping a thread 2 months old and bragging about the Heat barely squeaking by a bottom-feeder Cavs team playing withOut their -2- best players (Irving and Deng).
Look you septuagenarian dipsomaniac, all your obscurantism isn't going to change the fact that the Heat are 11-6 without Wade, 6-0 in their last six games without Wade and 4-0 when Tony "Champagne" Douglas starts in lieu of Dwyane Wade.
We all know LeChoke needs all the help he can get.
