DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

CleveTown™ · Post by **CleveTown™** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:09 pm

The margin between him and 2nd place just screams hack. Did DWC hack this number?

Post by **wailuaFC** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:10 pm

There have been some posters who have been thanking and I thanking then thanking again to boost their "stats"

AbeVigodaLive · Post by **AbeVigodaLive** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:13 pm

He's thanked more than 2,200 posts than I have.

Rigged. Obviously.

CleveTown™ · Post by **CleveTown™** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:15 pm

wailuaFC wrote:There have been some posters who have been thanking and I thanking then thanking again to boost their "stats"

ROFL, how pathetic!

CleveTown™ · Post by **CleveTown™** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:16 pm

AbeVigodaLive wrote:He's thanked more than 2,200 posts than I have.

Rigged. Obviously.

Come on Abe, get the monkey off your back. LIKE my post. Let me be your first.

Robceltsfan · Post by **Robceltsfan** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:16 pm

Why do you think the Bulls trolls have so many thanks? They thank almost every single post of TDKs.

gaskill15 · Post by **gaskill15** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:20 pm

Doesn't surprise me at all.

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:33 pm

2,185 of his thanks are all bulls fans posts

Post by **Kingcarl24** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:36 pm

Does TDK even have that many posts?

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:44 pm

Kingcarl24 wrote:Does TDK even have that many posts?

I will soon...today or tomorrow for sure

AlaskaHawks · Post by **AlaskaHawks** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:17 pm

Yeah, I have had one instance where DWCWMA "Thanked" and "unthanked" a single post of mine 7 times. I am not sure if it keeps the "thank" count for that or not, but he does that to almost every post he thanks.

AbeVigodaLive · Post by **AbeVigodaLive** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:29 pm

AlaskaHawks wrote:Yeah, I have had one instance where DWCWMA "Thanked" and "unthanked" a single post of mine 7 times. I am not sure if it keeps the "thank" count for that or not, but he does that to almost every post he thanks.

That seems to be a misguided use of time.

But we all have different priorities, I guess.

kobeunderbite · Post by **kobeunderbite** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:31 pm

is dwcmwa one of those secret geniuses ?

jordanzone · Post by **jordanzone** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:09 pm

DWC...owning as usual...

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:09 pm

AlaskaHawks wrote:Yeah, I have had one instance where DWCWMA "Thanked" and "unthanked" a single post of mine 7 times. I am not sure if it keeps the "thank" count for that or not, but he does that to almost every post he thanks.

Offensive · Post by **Offensive** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:15 pm

Hes a good lil lapdog

FPL · Post by **FPL** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:38 pm

dw is a legend.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

elartman1973 · Post by **elartman1973** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:50 pm

fpliii wrote:dw is a legend.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Legendary pathetic poster

elmouse03 · Post by **elmouse03** » Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:07 pm

fpliii wrote:dw is a legend.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A legend at what we don't know.

Sent from my computer using the keyboard.

AngerGeneral

DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really "thanked" over 2,200 posts?

Re: DWC really

Re: DWC really