Worst 3pt shooters in NBA history: Michael Jordan

[kobeunderbite]

[Bush4Ever.]

Guys like "Jacob Bolcer" are just straight NPCs.

Perfectly programmable non-men who don't think for themselves and thus lack moral character.

It's really kind of gross, to be honest.

[CleveTown™]

[zombiesonics]

Have we ever seen a bigger fall from grace than MJ?

[Havlicekstealsit]

The league moved the 3pt line in so the "I'm back" 2nd threepeat Mike could enjoy personal bests behind the arc.

[Deez]

lol, any season he shit atleast 2 threes a game he shot 35% or better. This is a clown stat

[kobeunderbite]

lol, any season he shit atleast 2 threes a game he shot 35% or better. This is a clown stat

Clown stat because it hurt your feefees lol

[elartman1973]

Nothing more embarrassing and desperate than these dumb gen z faggots trying to discredit Jordan when none of them even saw him play live. Just so they can pretend to have a weak argument that lebron is the goat.
Give it a rest. It's NEVER EVER been about stats or numbers.

If you know then you know...lebron slurpers clearly don't know jack shit.
Lol at thinking it's about statistics...jfc...you lose the argument by starting it with that every single time...it's very telling of how wrong you are if you even bring up stats....

Sad and embarrassing and lol at you stupid fucks trying to act lebron is the greates...gtfoh with that gibberish. He has no argument for him

[Deez]

lol, any season he shit atleast 2 threes a game he shot 35% or better. This is a clown stat

Clown stat because it hurt your feefees lol

No cause shooting 0.7 attempts a game isn’t gonna give you a high percentage lol. When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher. Pretty common sense

[kobeunderbite]

lol, any season he shit atleast 2 threes a game he shot 35% or better. This is a clown stat

Clown stat because it hurt your feefees lol

No cause shooting 0.7 attempts a game isn’t gonna give you a high percentage lol. When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher. Pretty common sense

Why would attempts per game correlate with a low shooting percentage? Do you think that if Steph Curry attempted 0.7 threes per game, his percentage would drop?

"When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher" - do you mean when the three-point line was moved in?

Not convinced you understand what "common sense" is, deez.

[Deez]

Clown stat because it hurt your feefees lol

No cause shooting 0.7 attempts a game isn’t gonna give you a high percentage lol. When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher. Pretty common sense

Why would attempts per game correlate with a low shooting percentage? Do you think that if Steph Curry attempted 0.7 threes per game, his percentage would drop?

"When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher" - do you mean when the three-point line was moved in?

Not convinced you understand what "common sense" is, deez.

Are you serious right now? lol. We have another Artie on the board?

[ElJorge]

No cause shooting 0.7 attempts a game isn’t gonna give you a high percentage lol. When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher. Pretty common sense

Why would attempts per game correlate with a low shooting percentage? Do you think that if Steph Curry attempted 0.7 threes per game, his percentage would drop?

"When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher" - do you mean when the three-point line was moved in?

Not convinced you understand what "common sense" is, deez.

Are you serious right now? lol. We have another Artie on the board?

Percentages don’t increase the more you shoot. That’s not how it works.

[_Vcsgrizzfan_]

Deez questioning other peoples' intelligence always makes me cringe a little. A little self awareness dude...

[Bush4Ever.]

All else equal, the more events are in play, the more and more your percentage trends towards a true score because the low and high tides of variance cancel each other out in larger sample sizes.

Jordan was simply a high variance three-point shooter relative to his baseline (which was slightly below average), which basically set his range from "terrible" to "above-average", instead of being consistently average or even consistently below-average, etc...

Lebron isn't terribly different from three in that regard. Kobe was roughly the same baseline, but less variant.

None of them are shooter-shooters, however great they were at being scorers.

[Deez]

Deez questioning other peoples' intelligence always makes me cringe a little. A little self awareness dude...

Comments like this make me laugh after people like you defend some of these moronic posts. You dumb enough to think shooting 2-3 threes a game compared to 0.7 doesn’t make a difference on one shooting percentage?

[elmerjfudd]

I think it hilarious when Jordan’s fanbase says he has no weakness yet Jordan himself realized his weakness by not exposing it.

[Robceltsfan]

Deez questioning other peoples' intelligence always makes me cringe a little. A little self awareness dude...

Comments like this make me laugh after people like you defend some of these moronic posts. You dumb enough to think shooting 2-3 threes a game compared to 0.7 doesn’t make a difference on one shooting percentage?

Number of attempts doesn't change percentage. 3 for 10 and 9 for 30 are still both 30%.

What are you talking about?

[Deez]

Why would attempts per game correlate with a low shooting percentage? Do you think that if Steph Curry attempted 0.7 threes per game, his percentage would drop?

"When he shot and averaged more his percentage was higher" - do you mean when the three-point line was moved in?

Not convinced you understand what "common sense" is, deez.

Are you serious right now? lol. We have another Artie on the board?

Percentages don’t increase the more you shoot. That’s not how it works.

You should maybe stop posting. Take a look at Jordan’s percentages shooting the three. Facts are right there.

[_Vcsgrizzfan_]

Deez questioning other peoples' intelligence always makes me cringe a little. A little self awareness dude...

Comments like this make me laugh after people like you defend some of these moronic posts. You dumb enough to think shooting 2-3 threes a game compared to 0.7 doesn’t make a difference on one shooting percentage?

Do you understand the difference between correlation and causation Deez? No, you don't. The large sample size of 3s outside of when the line was brought in trumps the sample sizes you want to talk about.

[ElJorge]

Are you serious right now? lol. We have another Artie on the board?

Percentages don’t increase the more you shoot. That’s not how it works.

You should maybe stop posting. Take a look at Jordan’s percentages shooting the three. Facts are right there.