![Rose :rosenew:](./images/smilies/ZiTMIEu.png)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sfchro ... 591347.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Kingcarl24 wrote:I don't understand why moving to cleaner energy sources could possibly be seen as a bad thing.
I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.Kingcarl24 wrote:I don't understand why moving to cleaner energy sources could possibly be seen as a bad thing.
Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.LNS wrote:I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.Kingcarl24 wrote:I don't understand why moving to cleaner energy sources could possibly be seen as a bad thing.
Would taxes skyrocket like the drunkard tdk suggested?
Would a lot of jobs be lost?
Not suggesting you have the answers, by the way.
I think the market should dictate what is used, not be forced into it. That is the point of a free market economy.Kingcarl24 wrote:Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.LNS wrote:I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.Kingcarl24 wrote:I don't understand why moving to cleaner energy sources could possibly be seen as a bad thing.
Would taxes skyrocket like the drunkard tdk suggested?
Would a lot of jobs be lost?
Not suggesting you have the answers, by the way.
I guess I just don't see why anyone would be against us as a nation finding a way to be cleaner with our energy. If California thinks they've found a path to move away from fossil fuels and help clean up the air, why would anyone fight that?
Kingcarl24 wrote:Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.LNS wrote:I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.Kingcarl24 wrote:I don't understand why moving to cleaner energy sources could possibly be seen as a bad thing.
Would taxes skyrocket like the drunkard tdk suggested?
Would a lot of jobs be lost?
Not suggesting you have the answers, by the way.
I guess I just don't see why anyone would be against us as a nation finding a way to be cleaner with our energy. If California thinks they've found a path to move away from fossil fuels and help clean up the air, why would anyone fight that?
What do U think happens to the batteries of an electric car when it needs to be scrapped? Do U have any idea what is needed to dig up the resources to get the batteries? Where do U think the electricity comes from to charge the car? (Hint Coal and Gas).... Is it really less pollution? U may want to look into it!Bartman wrote:Kingcarl24 wrote:Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.LNS wrote:
I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.
Would taxes skyrocket like the drunkard tdk suggested?
Would a lot of jobs be lost?
Not suggesting you have the answers, by the way.
I guess I just don't see why anyone would be against us as a nation finding a way to be cleaner with our energy. If California thinks they've found a path to move away from fossil fuels and help clean up the air, why would anyone fight that?
The government is taking away the God given right to pollute the hell of the planet. This a free country, it should be your own choice if you want to pollute the planet.../S
Thedictator wrote:What do U think happens to the batteries of an electric car when it needs to be scrapped? Do U have any idea what is needed to dig up the resources to get the batteries? Where do U think the electricity comes from to charge the car? (Hint Coal and Gas).... Is it really less pollution? U may want to look into it!Bartman wrote:Kingcarl24 wrote:
Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.
I guess I just don't see why anyone would be against us as a nation finding a way to be cleaner with our energy. If California thinks they've found a path to move away from fossil fuels and help clean up the air, why would anyone fight that?
The government is taking away the God given right to pollute the hell of the planet. This a free country, it should be your own choice if you want to pollute the planet.../S
In other words...you're a complete moron afraid of progress and all for use of toxic materials..thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's not just California... the Biden/Kamala/AOC/Sanders radical Left's "Green New Deal" calls for the complete elimination of all gas/coal/oil throughout the entire country by 2035... and in its place, millions of miles of turbines/solar panels throughout America.
In other words say hello to skyrocketing taxes (to finance this nonsense plan) and say goodbye to all the forests and wildlife the Liberals claim to care so much about, not to mention massive power outages in the middle of summers (like California experienced a month or so ago).
I really can't stand to see the sight of you on this board anymore after what you did.elartman1973 wrote:In other words...you're a complete moron afraid of progress and all for use of toxic materials..thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's not just California... the Biden/Kamala/AOC/Sanders radical Left's "Green New Deal" calls for the complete elimination of all gas/coal/oil throughout the entire country by 2035... and in its place, millions of miles of turbines/solar panels throughout America.
In other words say hello to skyrocketing taxes (to finance this nonsense plan) and say goodbye to all the forests and wildlife the Liberals claim to care so much about, not to mention massive power outages in the middle of summers (like California experienced a month or so ago).
If it was up to republicans we would still be riding horses
And ignoring environmental issues makes you a fucking moron
Tell me.what you think I didUNC MJ FAN. wrote:I really can't stand to see the sight of you on this board anymore after what you did.elartman1973 wrote:In other words...you're a complete moron afraid of progress and all for use of toxic materials..thedangerouskitchen wrote:It's not just California... the Biden/Kamala/AOC/Sanders radical Left's "Green New Deal" calls for the complete elimination of all gas/coal/oil throughout the entire country by 2035... and in its place, millions of miles of turbines/solar panels throughout America.
In other words say hello to skyrocketing taxes (to finance this nonsense plan) and say goodbye to all the forests and wildlife the Liberals claim to care so much about, not to mention massive power outages in the middle of summers (like California experienced a month or so ago).
If it was up to republicans we would still be riding horses
And ignoring environmental issues makes you a fucking moron
You're really pathetic. You were banned for it. You know what you did little bitch.elartman1973 wrote:Tell me.what you think I didUNC MJ FAN. wrote:I really can't stand to see the sight of you on this board anymore after what you did.elartman1973 wrote: In other words...you're a complete moron afraid of progress and all for use of toxic materials..
If it was up to republicans we would still be riding horses
And ignoring environmental issues makes you a fucking moron
So should pure heroin be legal and sold at your local Walgreens?Thedictator wrote:I think the market should dictate what is used, not be forced into it. That is the point of a free market economy.Kingcarl24 wrote:Me too. I have no idea how it would work either. Unless they find a way to dramatically reduce the price of electric cars, it's not going to happen.LNS wrote:
I don’t think it’s necessarily bad, but I’d like to see a thorough breakdown on how it would work.
Would taxes skyrocket like the drunkard tdk suggested?
Would a lot of jobs be lost?
Not suggesting you have the answers, by the way.
I guess I just don't see why anyone would be against us as a nation finding a way to be cleaner with our energy. If California thinks they've found a path to move away from fossil fuels and help clean up the air, why would anyone fight that?