AngerGeneral

Who said I was ripping on anyone? You call yourself boring, do you not? Bush is an admitted egghead. So I simply put the two of you in the same category since you're virtually joined at the hip anyways. Don't get so mad. Eggheads are usually wrapped up in intellectual pursuits to the exclusion of a...

General Custard made sounder strategic moves than Rob has in this thread.

Just terrible Rob. Not good.

[Edit: LOLspelling]

Rob, you might not even be in the second-tier of posters.

Know your place and shut the fuck up.

I'm really serious about this.

The original post might honestly be the worst post I've seen this month, all things considered.

AbeVigodaLive wrote:

"Well, that lame attempt was shot down quickly. Damn. Let me try this one."

- Bush4ever

[Note: I apologize for this post if it's too acerbic for you. I'm very upset right now.]

You are taking this entirely too seriously and need to relax a bit.

It's ok. I understand. I think the same flukes happened, making it a series of unique Derrick Rose situations when I came in 2nd, 1st, 1st, 2nd, et al in virtually every other MVP vote we've had. You run almost completely on inertia. That's why you could never go to InsideHoops or RealGM or Sherdog...

Deez Na wrote:
Nice try, Bush.

Since you've gone down the Dumb as Deez, Cucked as Deez, and watered down Artie route, your production has been pretty lacking.

That's my honest evaluation and I hope it doesn't upset you too much.

Someday, I hope to make it into the top 10 for relevant AG message board posters. Someday... Your messageboard MVP this year was basically like Derrick Rose or Wes Unseld's MVP. We all know who the heavy hitters are, but the situation formed itself perfectly for a merely semi-elite poster to get MV...

Deez Na wrote:
You definitely weren't on top back on the espn boards.

You've basically ranged from about a B-level poster to a D+/C- level poster, and you are definitely in a slump.

I hope that evaluation doesn't upset you too much.

Nothing that I read breaks the Hippocratic Oath. It's absolutely not playing God to maximize the amount of good a limited resource can provide. That's why (all else equal), you'd give a transplant to a 30 year old versus a 80 year old or a non-drug user versus a drug-user and so on. Doctors don't pl...

My status on this board means a lot to me, and I'll do whatever it takes to protect it.

I loved being proven conclusively correct about the Harden vs. Westbrook issue.

[Edit: I do basically agree with the foul/officiating beefs. It's hard to blame the players though. That type of correction needs to come from the top-down for sure.]

Kobeunderbite wrote:
No you haven't. You weren't even around from about 2009-2013.

10 years =/= 10 consecutive years.

I started this handle in 2004. You were 4/5 years old when I entered the game.

Think about it.

I've been a consistent top-tier guy for at least 10 years.

Which is probably not a good thing, but whatever.

Too bad the series turned out to be rather underwhelming.

I think most of us were hoping for something a bit more.

That's okay though. It's been an unusually interesting first round this year.

Butler is a superstar by any reasonable definition of the word. 24/6/6, "good" efficiency, with strong defense. Strong analytics as well. For sure he's not in the uppermost tier, but he's in the next tier beneath that one. What's the fg%? Also someone has to score on the bulls...If he was...

CleveTown™ wrote:

Rambling post.

I don't live in Minnesota anymore.

The rest of your rambling is basically repeating the same mistake I mentioned over and over again.

Like I said, read the link. Learn basic economics.

Feet-stamping and crying doesn't make 2 + 2 = 5.

Protectionism means you will be eating dinner at your beautiful oak dining table that will last one hundred years. "Free trade" means you will be eating dinner at your particle board table that may last ten years. What in the fuck are you babbling about? Free trade is simply voluntary exc...

You back NAFTA then. what a cuck. Canada was double dipping on subsidized lumber and selling it cheaper than Amerikan lumber. F that. Maybe you like the Amerikan lumber workers getting screwed I don't. Tariffs don't protect "the workers". They artificially help some workers (in lumber) an...

Look at your argument. The tariff is bad for the poor because the poor (who on average make stupid purchases, I've seen them at Walmart) won't be able to afford milk. And I say that argument is BS because these same poor that you are virtue signaling were putting around just fine in their beaters w...