AngerGeneral

Tatum for Edwards, straight up?

I probably would. If for no other reasons, getting three extra years of someone high-level in that slot.

I don't think the current advantage for Tatum overrides that factor combined with Edwards' ceiling and playoff eye to date.

elartman1973 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 8:25 pm

I'm sure I dont care one iota what they think as I basically completely detailed in a previous post


Your autism and Inability to ever make a valid point or stay on topic is truly getting out of hand
You best Check yourself

lol @ ur tiny brain and big fat ass titties

elartman1973 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 7:33 pm One of the main reasons I have no respect for them in any way at all

I'm sure they are crushed.

lmao

The 1987 Lakers faced 37, 42, and 39 win teams to get to the Finals. By net rating: 14, 16, 10th of 23 teams The 2024 Celtics have faced 46, 48, and 47 win teams to get to the Finals. By net rating: 10, 13, 16th of 30 teams I bet the first two rounds weren't that atypical historically (at least out ...

PhutureDynasty wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 6:53 pm
I think I'd rather have faced Indy in your shoes.

Yes, same.

Knicks in 7 wasn't a bad pick, IMO (just one game off). That's where I was with NY having HCA. I think people forgot how compact the East was this year. Three games difference between the Knicks and Pacers, but four slots in the seeding (1.8 points of net rating). Last year 2nd vs. 6th seed was 12 g...

Did anyone have Dallas and Indy in the CFs?

Didn't see either of those coming at all.

The Knicks got their anuses stretched by multiple cocks.

Sad and slightly surprising scene.

Should be an easy series for the Celtics at least (for an ECF).

My life is pretty great no matter how many lies you fabricate trying desperately to discredit it. You clearly know nothing on the topic Again, you resort to personal attacks when your side of an argument gets ripped to shreds by me. The sad part is you posting "lmao" as if you actually ma...

How many Christians on this board would swap lives with Artman?

lmao

I had it 115-112 Usyk.

Both guys represented, but it's hard to find a way into a winning Fury scorecard, IMO.

I can swim very well, but I actually did learn to swim later than most kids.

Just a resource and opportunity/relevance thing.

It's Friday TDK.

Don't worry about this stuff. Just enjoy the evening/night with your gal pal.

Honestly, my resume until age 21 or so would have probably looked worse than that. Farm Hand, 1998-2003 -Milked cows while being responsive to their needs. -Received hands on experience in shoveling shit. -Bailed hay using ergonomically correct methods. Bagger/Stocker, 2001-2004 -Exposed to modern b...

At least he didn't say "Assistant Senior Sales Broker"

"Assistant to the Senior Sales Broker"
"That's what I said...Assistant Sales Broker"
"No...Assistant to the Senior Sales Broker is....lower"

Not quite: Wilt vs. Russ (94 games): 29.9-PPG / 28.1-REB / 3.8-AST on .49% (vs. 30.1/22.9/4.4 on 54% for his career) You wouldn't use Wilt's career totals, since his post 1969 (post-Russell) years dropped his total career averages significantly. He averaged 34.4 ppg on 53 percent shooting from 1960...

So much fluff.

He's never going to make it.

"Peak Joker would be a slightly better scorer and the same rebounder as the Orlando Magic version of Rony Seikaly (17 and 10 output/game)"

-TDK

There's been a downward trend in minutes played per game for a number of years now, especially amongst star players. It's not an opinion. It's an objective fact. Joker has played 34-35 minutes a game since 2021. Shaq played 36-40 minutes a game during the threepeat D-Rob played 36-41 minutes a game ...

I was assuming we drop 1963(ish) Russell into the modern game, but with an understanding of the modern game advancements. The only reason he wouldn't be my top pick is because of the weight/size issue. He'd be a 6'11" guy today with how guys are measured today, and he played his career from 215...