AngerGeneral

Career QB Rating:

Daniel Jones: 109.7
Tom Brady: 97.8
Drew Brees: 97.7
Aaron Rodgers: 103.0
Peyton Manning: 96.5

Bartman wrote:
Acting like Ripper is never a good look and incidentally Ripper doesn't follow the rules.

Ripper is my closest political homie on the board and a rules expert.

CleveTown™ wrote:
I will Thursday when i go up after class on opening day

Thanks.

Make sure you take it in a part that isn't accessible to the general public to avoid having trolls call the picture fake/not valid proof, etc...

Bartman wrote:

ROFL...You've got nothing.

No, I'm just not willing to break the rules or be baited into breaking the rules.

Cleve said he would take a time-dated picture and settle the doubt.

That's good enough for me as one of his biggest and most vocal supporters.

Follow the rules.

Bartman wrote:
PM and let me decide. Don't worry I'm the most trustworthy guy on this site despite my trollish posting style.

Sharing PMs without permission of all parties involved is against the rules.

You need to follow the rules.

@ripper

What does that have to do with the simple difference in population sizes and average baseline performance? Moreover, on a team front he ain't winning 11/13 or 8/8 in the modern era with free agency, runaway trades, quasi-collusion, etc... Guys 6'10" barefoot and taller are and will always be o...

Bartman wrote:
The evidence Titan provided must not be too strong if that would quell your doubts.

Titan's evidence is intriguing and suggestive, but technically not *automatically* at odds with Cleve's claims.

Cleve, can you just take a time-dated picture of you in the middle of the store/construction (holding a paper that says Clevetown, 9/23/19) or something similar?

That would settle doubts for the most part, and overturn some of Titan's very real PM evidence.

I don't think anyone believes he would put up the same numbers/level of dominance if he were transported to the modern game. But if you use the "against peers" standard like most people do when evaluating historical greatness, Russell ranks very highly, with the understanding there was a ...

Bartman wrote:
Come on, Bush, you're a better troll than that, aren't you?

I'm just disappointed in him, honestly.

Titan just shared the evidence with me via PM.

Very disappointing Cleve. How do you even square that with your faith?

The whole problem I have with Russell being considered the GOAT is you have to ignore that he was vastly superior athletically to other players at the time. Of course, his numbers and impact are going to be inflated. Honestly, it's sad he couldn't dominate offensively with such physical superiority...

How can he beat GOAT with passable offense? Should we bump Rodman up the all time list for having an offense game that wasn't complete crap. I use to believe that at the individual-level, offense and defense should given seriously different weighting (towards offense obviously), since players can m...

It’s ol’ Bush and his Backpicks ... Sorry, I know numbers are scary Barbie. Don't worry, there are tons of scouting reports and videos/qualitative descriptions as well (which is actually what I was referencing). https://di2ponv0v5otw.cloudfront.net/posts/2018/07/28/5b5cf8213e0caa494c6e5fd3/m_5b5cf8...

I think Russell was approximately Hakeem 1.0 in terms of the interplay between interior and perimeter defense (probably not quite as quick as Hakeem outright, but probably more impactful relative to era). I don't think he would be close to being the most impactful strictly on the perimeter, however....

elartman1973 wrote:
Fail. I'm fat better traveled than you are

You sure are.

I would much rather the average woman go topless than Artie going topless, even if Artie has bigger boobies.

I'm royally fucked.

Ouchie

If men can get breast cancer, women can get testicular cancer.

It's literally 2019. Like hello!!!

I thought you had children Artie?

Actually interacting with your children seems like a good use of weekend time, don't you think?